- Jun 4, 2004
- 16,846
- 13,778
- 146
If you are a Texas parent with school age kids you have to read this.
Basically the Texas Education Agency in 2004 arbitrarily decided that to many students were receiving special education help. They set a statewide goal of no more than 8.5% of the student body would receive services down from the nationwide average of 13%. This is against federal law which states public schools must provide special education services to those who need it.
The Houston Chronicle has 7 part story on this.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/denied/?cmpid=hcael
I can confim this story from personal experience. The school fought us from day one on providing services to one of my kids. After originally identifying my child as possibly needing headstart (they didn't by a single point) around the time this edict was being passed down:
Since my wife and I were able to spend the time and money to help our child and force the school to help, they are getting decent grades in AP classes now. I'm sure other kids in similar situations without those resources, as per the article, have been screwed.
Some in the state legislature are currently trying to rectify this.
Basically the Texas Education Agency in 2004 arbitrarily decided that to many students were receiving special education help. They set a statewide goal of no more than 8.5% of the student body would receive services down from the nationwide average of 13%. This is against federal law which states public schools must provide special education services to those who need it.
The Houston Chronicle has 7 part story on this.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/denied/?cmpid=hcael
"We were basically told in a staff meeting that we needed to lower the number of kids in special ed at all costs," said Jamie Womack Williams, who taught in the Tyler Independent School District until 2010. "It was all a numbers game."
Texas is the only state that has ever set a target for special education enrollment, records show.
It has been remarkably effective.
In the years since its implementation, the rate of Texas kids receiving special education has plummeted from near the national average of 13 percent to the lowest in the country — by far.
In 2015, for the first time, it fell to exactly 8.5 percent.
If Texas provided services at the same rate as the rest of the U.S., 250,000 more kids would be getting critical services such as therapy, counseling and one-on-one tutoring.
"It's extremely disturbing," said longtime education advocate Jonathan Kozol, who described the policy as a cap on special education meant to save money.
"It's completely incompatible with federal law," Kozol said. "It looks as if they're actually punishing districts that meet the needs of kids."
I can confim this story from personal experience. The school fought us from day one on providing services to one of my kids. After originally identifying my child as possibly needing headstart (they didn't by a single point) around the time this edict was being passed down:
- They refused verbal requests to test for disabilities
- After paying $$$$ to confirm a disability ourselves they tried to refuse service because our child's grades were to good (this is against federal law)
- Relented enough to put our child on 504 (much cheaper than services)
- Refused to provide a laptop per the 504 agreement (we paid for one until 8th grade when they were provided to all students)
Since my wife and I were able to spend the time and money to help our child and force the school to help, they are getting decent grades in AP classes now. I'm sure other kids in similar situations without those resources, as per the article, have been screwed.
Some in the state legislature are currently trying to rectify this.