As the paperwork was being completed, Mr. Oberholtzer’s son started peeling off the decal on the truck that showed the phone number and name of the company, but the salesman told him to stop because it would harm the paint and said it would be removed later, the lawsuit said.
Mr. Oberholtzer said his business had suffered. Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents met with him and advised him to protect himself, the lawsuit said. He started carrying a handgun.
In September, after excerpts from the Colbert segment aired during an Emmy Awards ceremony, the calls to Mr. Oberholtzer flared up again, averaging 100 to 200 every day, the lawsuit said.
The thing that kills me about humanity is how fast people turn on each other. 100 threat calls a day? They should be embarrassed to call themselves Americans.
people think he donated the truck? is paying to display his stickers!?
I would just assume it's a stolen car or something.
Can you imagine what he must've thought the first time he saw his truck over there. Has there ever been a more deserving W----T----F.
It really is funny, but I do feel he deserves compensation. Average his income over the three years prior, multiply by ten, and cut a check.
I wonder if law enforcement investigated the trail the truck took to get over there. Maybe some good came out of all this and they nailed some of the ISIS back office people and learned about their network.
Mark-1 Plumbing
We Annihilate the Competition
Not just them. Could just as easily been Turkey or Iraq.How did the truck end up thousands of miles away, in the Middle East? The Saudis buy a lot of used SUVs and trucks from the U.S, then supply it to ISIS?
How did the truck end up thousands of miles away, in the Middle East? The Saudis buy a lot of used SUVs and trucks from the U.S, then supply it to ISIS?
This is old and fake.
We are very self predatory....
The thing that kills me about humanity is how fast people turn on each other. 100 threat calls a day? They should be embarrassed to call themselves Americans.
I'm curious what grounds he could be suing on. Even if you assume there was a verbal agreement concerning the removal of the logo, it's breach of contract. And sure, he has actual damages from that breach but if the damages weren't reasonably foreseeable, I don't know how he collects anything. It sounds like a nuisance suit that you file just to get the defendant to settle.This hit the news like 6 months ago. Must have taken him this long to find a lawyer to take the case.
I'm curious what grounds he could be suing on.