Originally posted by: munky
Well, either XGI or S3, or maybe even Intel, but I'd like to see more competition. Although I'd also be interested in seeing just what AMD/Ati comes up with in the next few years.
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: sisq0kidd
***This thread is now about XGI***
You think they'll take another stab at the enthusiast market?
Bah! Fear the S3 Chrome!
http://www.s3graphics.com/en/products/chrome_s27/
Originally posted by: josh6079
Here you're playing a semantic game with the technicalities of your words. You clutch to the fact that you stated "it wasn't smart" when Wreckage paraphrased your words to mean fanboy. I did the same thing asking you who told you that you "sucked" cock. He never said you "sucked" it, you added that verb on your own. IIRC, he said you "liked" the cock. Just a taste of your own tatic. The point is, your words can literally say one thing and metaphorically imply another.Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: Wreckage
The crowning point is where Ackmed warned someone about calling him a fanboy, even though he has used that term among others many times.
I said it wasnt smart, and that we all should not have to resort to it. Feel free to find one time when I called someone a fanboy. Dont put words in my mouth, back up your claims. You and gstanfor have a bad habit of doing this.
You didn't cry to the mods, but now you're saying you did?I didnt cry to the mods, and Im not upset...Do you think having an adult conversation is telling someone they "suck cock", and name calling? Perhaps in grade school.
The true adult would know how to ignore immaturity--that or have fun insulting that immaturity. I have to say that I tend to agree with Wreckage's reasoning in not needing the interference of a Mod unless there are technical problems with software and such. If someone is out of hand, I believe I'm adult enough to deal with it and don't need the aid of another adult with a ban button. To each their own I guess.[/quote]The guy who I "cried to the mods" did. I reported it, because there is zero reason to say such a thing to anyone.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
No, Im not saying I cried to them. I reported someone being childish
Call it what you want, your definition of "reporting" and Wreckage's definition of "crying" are in the same context here.No, Im not saying I cried to them. I reported someone being childish...
Perhaps you haven't literally used the word "fanboy" but you've substituted it with "pals"--Linkwreckage claimed I have called others fanboys. When I have not.
Asking you to clarify what you meant and pointing out your hypocrocies is trolling now?Sorry, you're not doing well again this time. You just cant win, might as well give up. Trolling after me time and time again, isnt very productive for you. Even wreckage dropped it, because he knew he didnt have a leg to stand on. "fading to black" again, so to speak.
Originally posted by: sisq0kidd
***This thread is now about XGI***
You think they'll take another stab at the enthusiast market?
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Ackmed
No, Im not saying I cried to them. I reported someone being childish
Sounds a lot like crying to me. I would bet redbox is not the only one you cried about either.
This is how I see you posting on this forum among others.......
http://www.break.com/top_rated/patiencechild.html
Originally posted by: josh6079
Call it what you want, your definition of "reporting" and Wreckage's definition of "crying" are in the same context here.No, Im not saying I cried to them. I reported someone being childish...
Perhaps you haven't literally used the word "fanboy" but you've substituted it with "pals"--Linkwreckage claimed I have called others fanboys. When I have not.
Do you have any proof to back up the claim that they are pals? Do you have "a leg to stand on" with that claim?
Asking you to clarify what you meant and pointing out your hypocrocies is trolling now?Sorry, you're not doing well again this time. You just cant win, might as well give up. Trolling after me time and time again, isnt very productive for you. Even wreckage dropped it, because he knew he didnt have a leg to stand on. "fading to black" again, so to speak.
Where did I say they were the same thing? I said that both you and Wreckage used different terms to imply the same thing.Crying, and reporting are not the same thing. Reporting someone for breaking the rules, is done every single day, in virtually every single thing that rules are in place. As the mod said, he got himself banned.
So posting in the same thread in a similar manner or asking similar questions means that two people are pals? I guess that means you and Wreckage are pals since you post in the same place and do it with a similar "manner"...:roll:I said pals, because they stick together. You and wreckage post in the same manner. Same for gastanfor, and shineider. Its pretty obvious in this topic alone.
...the fact that you lied about redbox PMing you insults. That is hypocrisy:There wasnt any hypocrisy. If you want to find some, you could point out...
Care to prove this tangent? I'd like to see evidence that suggest he has insulted you through PM's directed towards your inbox. To my knowledge, his last PM he sent to you was concerning networking, Windows 64, and a motherboard, not insults. That tid-bit above was misinformative BS in every way.redbox also PM'd me with more insults, and one of which, was what I quoted him saying. You dont know all you think you do.
Right, that's where HQ textures and AF should help (though I guess not cure, either b/c both companies have hardwired their texture filtering shortcuts into their chips or b/c the game devs aren't trying hard enough). Stairways are an edge-aliasing issue (well, unless they're rain-slicked and reflective, in which case we're back at shaders). FYI, edge aliasing's reduced by "regular" AA, not adaptive/transparency AA.Originally posted by: Nova6
It reduces it on large repetitively-textured areas, but not entirely. On areas like stairways and the others I've mentioned, it doesn't do a thing.
I'm trying to remember if I had that same line problem at some point with a 9100 or 9800, but I haven't seen it for a while. Again, adaptive AA (AAA) isn't the solution to sparkly stair edges, regular AA is. (I said I was sorry about being pedantic, right? ) And 12x10 is a decent res, so I don't think that's a huge issue (though obviously you could go a lot higher with a X1900XT in those games if you weren't limited by your LCD).You're probably right about this, but as I said in my first post, turning on adaptive AA has the very annoying side effect of an ugly colored line showing up at the top and left of the screen in some games, and those happen to be the ones I play the most at the moment. I hope ATI will fix that someday. As for the resolution, I usually play at 1280x1024, so that could also be it.
Weird. I can't tell if that's texture or shader shimmer. I mean, moire is almost certainly texture, but I thought that was visible on large, flat, repetitively textured sections, not on fairly angly ppl and swords. But I wouldn't know unless I saw at least a screenshot, and even then we probably won't be able to do anything about it, so let's move on.For character and weapon models, I'm not referring to their outlines. I see slight shimmering moiré patterns on them (exactly like the ground texture shimmering) when the image is in motion. Nothing reduces that though.
Heh, that's the worst.Hell, I didn't think there was anything wrong with my X1900 XTX until I read about shimmering on a hardware site about a month after I got the card.
OK, so that narrows it down to the card or the games. Crap, it's square one! Where did he come from?!Also, I'm certain it's not a monitor issue. I tested this on a DVI LCD and a run of the mill cheap CRT. There was no IQ difference except for the usual CRT vs. LCD stuff, such as black level and the like.
NP, and I don't think you're being too picky with a high-end video card that basically becomes outdated in a few years. I guess your case (limited to 12x10) is one where SLIing two mid-range cards might be preferable to a single high-end one just b/c of the higher IQ options in XFire/SLI AA--assuming that XF/SLI works well in the games you play.I'm probably just being way too picky. I'm still looking forward to seeing how G80/R600 will do in terms of IQ, though. Thanks again for the help.
You might not be able to through filtering alone as it could be a problem with the game, not with the card's filtering.So how do you elimiante shimmering w/WoW on a x1800?
Originally posted by: josh6079
blah blah blah
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: josh6079
blah blah blah
Ignoring you, and your useless trolling from now on. When you can discuss things in an positive manner, let me know. You've proven to be hypocritical, and add nothing to the discussion. Im just sorry I went along for so long, not again.
To the subject at hand, NV and ATi both shimmer. NV shimmers wose. Much worse if HQ is not selected. Thats the bottom line. Ive read that turnng off Anisotropic opts (texture stage opts) off helps too. (HQ doesnt change these)
Originally posted by: wizboy11
Just to clear something up.
Shimmering is those lines you see on the ground when you move right? (the crawling thing?)
Originally posted by: Wreckage
It's funny that this thread started out as an ATI user noticing that he has shimmering and how "certain" people immediately had to bring NVIDIA into it. NVIDIA has nothing to do with this.
Originally posted by: BenSkywalker
BTW, some of you might remember a thread of mine 1 year ago, discussion exactly shimmering on WoW and GW. At that time, I decided for the Nvidia card because shimmering was really worse on the ATI version (I used the X1800XL on the comparison).
That was not changed until CAT 6.6 - you cannot control LOD Bias Clamp but ATI has turned off its optimization on HQ settings. Ony after this ATI turned to be better on this area.
So how do you elimiante shimmering w/WoW on a x1800? I'm running the latest drivers, "disabled" Catalyst AI, "forced" HQ AF and still can't get rid of the shimmering. It's an awful lot better then it is by default- but it is certainly not gone. All the way up to 2048x1536 w/16x HQ AF- it's still there. Particularly annoying on road textures out a middling to far amount depending on the camera angle.
Originally posted by: Nova6
It reduces it on large repetitively-textured areas, but not entirely. On areas like stairways and the others I've mentioned, it doesn't do a thing.
You're probably right about this, but as I said in my first post, turning on adaptive AA has the very annoying side effect of an ugly colored line showing up at the top and left of the screen in some games, and those happen to be the ones I play the most at the moment. I hope ATI will fix that someday. As for the resolution, I usually play at 1280x1024, so that could also be it.
You're also probably right about this too. For character and weapon models, I'm not referring to their outlines. I see slight shimmering moiré patterns on them (exactly like the ground texture shimmering) when the image is in motion. Nothing reduces that though.
Well, it's actually quite possible my 6600GT had IQ problems too and that I just didn't notice them. Hell, I didn't think there was anything wrong with my X1900 XTX until I read about shimmering on a hardware site about a month after I got the card.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Ive read that turnng off Anisotropic opts (texture stage opts) off helps too. (HQ doesnt change these)
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: josh6079
blah blah blah
Ignoring you, and your useless trolling from now on. When you can discuss things in an positive manner, let me know. You've proven to be hypocritical...
You're right. You certainly do "add" things whether they are true or not....and add nothing to the discussion.