[TFTCentral] Acer announces two F/G-Sync 34" ultra-wide 1440p monitors(75 Hz)

[Mondozei]

This isn't the first time that we've heard about this, but it is the first time that we've gotten this much detail.

TFTCentral has the story

Oh, and of course there's a G-sync tax in there.

 

[Subyman]

Glad to see a free sync version. Price isn't too bad.

 

[therealnickdanger]

The XR341CK (FreeSync version) will offer HDMI 2.0 (MHL), DisplayPort, Mini DP and DP out connections, along with a 4 port USB 3.0 hub. It will support daisy chaining via the DP out port and also PiP and PbP functions.

The XR341CKA (G-sync model) will apparently offer DisplayPort, but also an additional HDMI 1.4 video connection. That would mark the first G-sync screen we've seen with more than one connection, so we will be interested to see how this works. Acer mentioned the screen was G-sync v2, so perhaps they have made adjustments to allow more than one video input. With the G-sync module being used, the XR341CKA will also support ULMB (Ultra Low Motion Blur). The XR341CKA also has a 4 port USB 3.0 hub as with the other model.

I'm guessing that VRR modes will continue to operate only over the DP connection, but it's nice to see a bunch of additional ports and features. I'm a bit confused as to why there can't be two DP ports - one with the G-Sync module and one for FSync. Either way, you're making two different models, so why not combine them into one SKU? Unless there's a specific clause from AMD/NVIDIA that prevents using both techs in the same unit.

 

[3DVagabond]

I'm guessing that VRR modes will continue to operate only over the DP connection, but it's nice to see a bunch of additional ports and features. I'm a bit confused as to why there can't be two DP ports - one with the G-Sync module and one for FSync. Either way, you're making two different models, so why not combine them into one SKU? Unless there's a specific clause from AMD/NVIDIA that prevents using both techs in the same unit.

Not a guess. Since VRR requires DP1.2a. The reason for DP and miniDP instead of full size DP x2, I'm now guessing, is Thunderbolt compatibility.

 

[96Firebird]

This isn't the first G-sync screen with more than just DP input. The BenQ XL2420G has DVI-DL and 2xHDMI alongside the DP input.

 

[Shehriazad]

Holy crap I've been waiting for a proper above 60 hz Ultrawide for so long.


I'll get one for sure once I either get my hands on a decent/cheap itx 970 or once AMD releases something decent in their 300 series.


Thanks for that post...Proper ultrawide IPS panels are SO FRIKKIN HARD TO FIND.


Since the Monitor is apparently not coming before July...there is no rush for me to already switch out my GPU again...and since Free and Gsync are both on board...I'm not even pressured by either camp...which is great.(That's just the best possible outcome)

 

[Subyman]

I'm guessing that VRR modes will continue to operate only over the DP connection, but it's nice to see a bunch of additional ports and features. I'm a bit confused as to why there can't be two DP ports - one with the G-Sync module and one for FSync. Either way, you're making two different models, so why not combine them into one SKU? Unless there's a specific clause from AMD/NVIDIA that prevents using both techs in the same unit.

Because AMD users would have to pay the nvidia tax for no reason.

 

[snorge]

What is with the stupid Gsync tax comments. It doesn't make any sense.

 

[biostud]

Unfortunately it will probably the 48-75Hz panel that the LG monitor uses. It would be nice if the minimum refresh will be around 30-35Hz.

 

[96Firebird]

Because AMD users would have to pay the nvidia tax for no reason.

I'm sure some would gladly pay the extra $100-$200 "Nvidia tax" for a VRR-capable monitor that doesn't lock them into one vendor.

 

[Subyman]

I'm sure some would gladly pay the extra $100-$200 "Nvidia tax" for a VRR-capable monitor that doesn't lock them into one vendor.

Perhaps, but I guess their market research has shown its not worth doing right now.

What is with the stupid Gsync tax comments. It doesn't make any sense.

It is my understanding that the g-sync module comes at a higher cost than integrating free sync. As is evident by the g-sync version of this monitor costing 100 more.

 

[bystander36]

At least the difference is only $100 this time around.

 

[Meekers]

At least the difference is only $100 this time around.

It is £100, or $150.

 

[bystander36]

It is £100, or $150.

Typically, the euro cost is the same as the dollar cost. They tend to just have to pay higher prices. I fully expect that same price in dollars when it is released.

 

[Subyman]

Typically, the euro cost is the same as the dollar cost. They tend to just have to pay higher prices. I fully expect that same price in dollars when it is released.

That is a British pound, not euro. So, its about $1.50 = £1.00. I'm with you though, I don't think it will translate like that to the US market. I think it will be $100 more here as well. $1500 for the monitor won't push many units in the US.

 

[Elfear]

I'm a little disappointed that the max refresh rate is only 75hz. I was hoping for closer to 120hz. Still looking forward to seeing the reviews though. Ultra-wide is just so sexy.

 

[Soccerman06]

So LG panel then?

 

[Insomniator]

Is 75hz a noticable jump over 60? I have no idea, I've never see anything above my own 60hz screen in action.

 

[digitaldurandal]

Unfortunately it will probably the 48-75Hz panel that the LG monitor uses. It would be nice if the minimum refresh will be around 30-35Hz.

While I am interested in this model, I would definitely prefer a 120hz TN panel with 8 bit color. Would likely be a little cheaper too.

I want an ultrawide but I have a 3 monitor setup currently that I am not unhappy with so I don't have to dive in on the first model. I was disappointed with the 2560x1080 34in (actually 32.7) If it had been 1440p ultrawide I may have bought it.

Will have to see how the model reviews.

 

[digitaldurandal]

Is 75hz a noticable jump over 60? I have no idea, I've never see anything above my own 60hz screen in action.

Mouse is more responsive feeling visually you would have to compare side by side to notice probably. However with this model since it has freesync it will probably feel much better while gaming as long as you dont drop under the minimum framerate.

 

[omeds]

Is 75hz a noticable jump over 60? I have no idea, I've never see anything above my own 60hz screen in action.

It is imo. One of my displays is a Dell U2913WM and I run it oc'd to 75hz. It feels more responsive and motion is noticeably smoother. Not a major difference, but about what you would expect from a 25% increase in refresh rate.

 

[xthetenth]

Is 75hz a noticable jump over 60? I have no idea, I've never see anything above my own 60hz screen in action.

Not sure, but with the potential for badness when dropping below the minimum framerate of the screen, a higher maximum gives more range, which is very good to have.

 

[Lonyo]

That is a British pound, not euro. So, its about $1.50 = £1.00. I'm with you though, I don't think it will translate like that to the US market. I think it will be $100 more here as well. $1500 for the monitor won't push many units in the US.

It's more like £1 = $1.20 in terms of price shown to consumers, but that's UK with tax price vs US without tax price, which is the way prices are always shown in each country.

 

[snorge]

It is my understanding that the g-sync module comes at a higher cost than integrating free sync. As is evident by the g-sync version of this monitor costing 100 more.

That doesn't mean it is anything like a tax though. You are paying extra for a hardware feature of the display.

 

[badb0y]

That doesn't mean it is anything like a tax though. You are paying extra for a hardware feature of the display.

It is a tax if you are not going to be using nVidia cards. I have nVidia cards and I feel like it's a tax especially when I am looking FreeSync which is performs similarly but the monitors cost less.