Originally posted by: Mem
I`m not clear on what point you`re trying to make since I never made any comments about the R300 ,I don`t know how the R300 came into the subject being this thread is about 43.45 drivers and not ATI ,anyway I don`t use FSAA or care about benchmarks,I only upgrade my drivers to official drivers on Nvidia`s website.
Main things I look for are stability and image quality (on my current card),as a gamer running games without problems is more important to me then 3dmark or few extra FPS here or there.
I guess you`ve never seen some crappy monitors and are trying to say all monitors are created equal .
Btw I for one cannot say anything bad or have said anything bad about the R300 image quality.
I`ve said all I`m going to say ,back to gaming online.
God. Comparison with R300 kicked in for the matter of DX9 support for we were talking about 43.45 and FP32 issue.
Now you claim you were talking about your own private vga and gaming. That's good.
However, why you commented about things like IQ in general concept or DX9 detonator getting whql if you were only talking about your gaming?
You are making the whole course of discussion pointless with a few words.
And about monitors, brands, and mobos.
Oh god. It's apparent you don't know what you're talking about or you are deliberately dodging the point.
They are to do with signal purity or noise or so on, so they can affect IQ(1) in that sense.
But they cannot affect the original 3D objects that vga create. Hence they cannot affect IQ(2) in that sense.
We were not talking about IQ(1), for it doesn't have anything to do with things like texture, shader, aa/af, and so on.
And as i said, in standardized situation, IQ(1) differences like blurriness, signal noise, compatibility issues and so on are negligeble.
Yet, you persist on IQ(1). Again you make the discussion even more pointless.