Thank you PartyPoker for the generous donation

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
OK, so let me preface this by saying that this is kind of a bragging thread so if that bothers you, you should probably not bother reading on.

So I got an email from PartyPoker the other day (I'm not in the States, so I can still play there) offering me $50 to play with no deposit required. Now I hadn't touched my account there in months, probably not for at least 6 months.

Total: Non-cashable $50

I've always enjoyed some small stakes limit poker, I play mostly for fun but I'm good enough to win fairly consistently at the small stakes. So I figure I'd play a bit with my $50 at the .50/1 tables. With a bit of luck and a bit of good play, I built up to about $100...

Total: +$50

Then I got busy and the bonus was about to expire so I wagered the $50 freebie dollars on one hand of blackjack (as it would be lost anyway). I got lucky again and doubled up to $100. Took the $50 win and bet the freebie $50 again but lost it (the bonus system is a bit weird if you play around the bonus deadline).

Total: +$100

I kind of just left that as is for a while with a few small bets here and there that didn't really pay off, I was really just screwing around with the money since PartyPoker requires a minimum $500 cashout to send you a cheque.

Total: ~+$75

Then it occurred to me to use the Martingale betting strategy in Blackjack. For those of you who aren't aware, it's the strategy where you double your bet after every loss. Now, as we all know Blackjack is a -EV game where the house has an advantage (though a very small edge with perfect strategy). The fact that with perfect strategy you're only a very marginal dog is quite important when using the Martingale because it means the odds of you busting out are relatively low. Specifically, if we're about a 0.5% dog, that means that the odds of an n hand losing streak are (0.5025)^n. As you can see, that becomes pretty low, pretty quick.

If you were to play indefinitely, you would eventually lose because you would bump either into the upper limit for the table (in this case $500/bet) or you would lose your entire bankroll. In my case, however, it doesn't really matter because I didn't invest anything to begin with. If I lose it all, so be it.

So yesterday, I start playing this strategy. I got lucky and didn't hit any excessively long streaks too soon and started building up the bankroll... $75 became $150... $150 became $250... Eventually, I made it up to $500. I was about to cash out here, but decided to get a little greedy and played on, eventually making it up to about $650.

At this point I was getting bored (and tired, this took maybe 3-4 hours). So I cashed out CAD $500 and left the rest in my account. With the cash out fee and exchange rate, I actually cashed out about $520 to get my CAD $500.

Total: +$500

Today I decided to play a little more with it to see if I could push it further. Long story short, I used the same strategy and cashed out another $520. This time I didn't leave any money in the account since eventually the strategy is going to lose so I may as well quit while I'm ahead.

Total: +$1k

I'm thinking of writing a program to run some simulations to see what the statistics are for playing a Martingale with bonus money! I think it would be quite interesting.

Now, I just have to figure out what new toy(s) I want to spend this money on!

I haven't really read anything about people using this technique with bonus cash, is it a common strategy? It would seem to me that it could be quite successful given a reasonable size bonus; while the expectation value is negative, the probability distribution is split into 2 very distinct groups (bust out and very rich)
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Nice hehe, free money is always good.

What are the table limits for the BJ that you played? $1-$500?

Yes, that's right. if you have enough of a bankroll you basically need to avoid a 9 hand losing streak. Although the most I ever got to was 7 consecutive losses which is good because my bankroll couldn't have taken any more than that.

Of course, a little bit of luck here and there never hurts
 

ric1287

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,845
0
0
so if you are doubling you bet after every loss, what if you lose like the first 10 hands? Just screwed?
 

echow87

Senior member
Nov 16, 2003
720
0
0
very good, the martingale strategy is one of the best, simple yet effective, good job!
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: ric1287
so if you are doubling you bet after every loss, what if you lose like the first 10 hands? Just screwed?

Pretty much, yes.

But to give you an idea of the odds of an n hand losing streak:

1: 0.5025
2: 0.2525
3: 0.1269
4: 0.0638
5: 0.0320
6: 0.0161
7: 0.0081
8: 0.0041
9: 0.0020
10: 0.0010

So the odds of a 10 hand losing streak are roughly 1/1000; that is, not very likely.


 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,335
1
81
Ever entertain the idea of doing this with other people's money for a cut?
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: joshsquall
I wish I had the balls to do this with any sizable amount of money.

Truthfully, I wouldn't have done it if I had to invest any of my money either. I could very well have busted out very quickly and gotten nothing out of it. Basically I was just hoping variance would turn things my way; and lucky for me it worked out.
 

ric1287

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,845
0
0
so wait, how does the probability of losing decrease each time? Isn't it a "new" deck each hand?
 

Lorax

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2000
1,658
0
0
Originally posted by: ric1287
so wait, how does the probability of losing decrease each time? Isn't it a "new" deck each hand?

it's the chance of never winning. decreases as number of trials increases.
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: ric1287
so wait, how does the probability of losing decrease each time? Isn't it a "new" deck each hand?

The probability of losing each individual hand is always the same. There is no correlation across the hands; as you say, the deck is shuffled every time.

The probability of an n hand streak is what I was expressing here. If you've lost 6 hands in a row, you've got a roughly 50% chance of losing the 7th.
 

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,107
4
81
That's awesome - I've been playing at pokerstars and reading some poker books as well. Do you recommend any books or just practice?
 

Chronoshock

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
4,860
1
81
Your gains are linear and your losses are exponential. Sure your odds of losing enough to hit table limits are low, but your estimated value is still in the negative. Martingale is one of the oldest and most obvious betting strategies, and people don't use it for a reason.
 

flxnimprtmscl

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2003
7,962
2
0
Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
That's awesome - I've been playing at pokerstars and reading some poker books as well. Do you recommend any books or just practice?

You realize he won this money playing blackjack right?
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: Chronoshock
Your gains are linear and your losses are exponential. Sure your odds of losing enough to hit table limits are low, but your estimated value is still in the negative. Martingale is one of the oldest and most obvious betting strategies, and people don't use it for a reason.

You clearly didn't read the OP, please do before stating something that's been said several times already.

AgaBoogaBoo, I've read Sklansky's the Theory of Poker and Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players but the truth is that at such low limits play is straight-forward and players generally aren't great at changing up their playing style.
 

Epic Fail

Diamond Member
May 10, 2005
6,252
2
0
You can only pull this off on partypoker, you will run into the table limit in 5 hands in most casinos.
 

Firebot

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2005
1,476
2
0
Originally posted by: intogamer
Don't forget tax thats $700 for ya

He's in Canada Winnings are not taxable.

OP of course you realize that it won't always work the way it did for you. Then again, it's playing with free money so the risks and flaws of Martingale don't really hit you hard. Just don't use that type of betting strategy with 'real money'.

I used the Party Poker money I got and played a tournament with it, but lost unfortunately.
 

HammerCurl

Senior member
Apr 3, 2007
651
0
0
I did this with Blackjack on party poker and lost $200. Probably made like $30 before the bankroll died
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: HammerCurl
I did this with Blackjack on party poker and lost $200. Probably made like $30 before the bankroll died

Exactly. The point isn't that you can potentially make money short-run, it's that your expected value is negative. At some point you're going to run out of money, and then you're screwed.
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: HammerCurl
I did this with Blackjack on party poker and lost $200. Probably made like $30 before the bankroll died

Exactly. The point isn't that you can potentially make money short-run, it's that your expected value is negative. At some point you're going to run out of money, and then you're screwed.

Well when you're talking about bonus money, the point actually IS that you can potentially make money in the short run.

I wasn't interested in grinding out 5000 hands of poker to make it to $500 and was quite willing to accept the fact that I might lose it all. Hence, the Martingale was a good strategy for me in this situation despite the negative expectation value.

As Firebot said, I wouldn't try it with with "real money" so to speak but with freebie cash, I didn't really have much to lose
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |