- Mar 10, 2005
- 14,647
- 2
- 0
no, it's not too early! f1 teams are hard at work on the 2012 season, and so are the fans!
the first contender for must-have gadget of the year is already being copied:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96952
here's a piece on the evolution of the fire suit:
http://www.formula1.com/news/features/2012/1/12917.html
in the aftermath of political turmoil and human rights abuses, will the 2012 bahrain gp go ahead? most fans are against the idea for several reasons, but money talks:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/01/11/bahrain-circuit-reinstates-fired-employees/
robert kubica has fallen on some ice, re-breaking the leg injuries that took him out of 2011. good luck, robert
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/01/11/kubica-suffers-injury-setback-fall/
the first contender for must-have gadget of the year is already being copied:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96952
Lotus's rivals look set to be forced to copy its innovative reactive ride height system ahead of the 2012 season, with the FIA happy the concept is totally legal.
There has been much intrigue in recent days about the mechanism that Lotus was reported to have tried out at the Abu Dhabi young driver test last year.
The mechanical system helps maintain a standard ride height during braking - when often the front of the car would dip down.
Rivals teams are understood to have looked into the system and its legality over recent days - with a report in Gazzetta dello Sport this week suggesting it was driver adjusted by the use of a pedal in the cockpit.
However, if the drivers were changing the ride height of the cars under braking then that would be a breach of the rules.
Article 3.15 of the F1 Technical Regulations states: "With the exception of the parts necessary for the adjustment described in Article 3.18 [the DRS], any car system, device or procedure which uses driver movement as a means of altering the aerodynamic characteristics of the car is prohibited."
AUTOSPORT can reveal, however, that the adjustment to the ride height - which improves aerodynamic performance and stability on the Lotus under braking - does not come from the driver.
Instead it is reactive to brake torque and is linked directly to the suspension - so cannot be classified as a moveable aerodynamic device in the way that independent mass dampers were.
The fact that the driver is not involved, and that the system is a part of the suspension, means it complies fully with the F1 regulations.
here's a piece on the evolution of the fire suit:
http://www.formula1.com/news/features/2012/1/12917.html
A racing drivers work clothes of 60 years ago couldnt have been more basic. They usually consisted of: lightweight cotton trousers and a T-shirt, and thin skinned leather/suede shoes, often with rubber soles - an outfit topped off by a flimsy fabric skullcap. Compounding this ensembles flammable sins were combustible leather gloves, often with perforated or stringed backs, and goggles with aluminium frames that could become branding-iron hot in the blink of an eye. How very different from the clothing worn by todays so much better protected heroes.
in the aftermath of political turmoil and human rights abuses, will the 2012 bahrain gp go ahead? most fans are against the idea for several reasons, but money talks:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/01/11/bahrain-circuit-reinstates-fired-employees/
robert kubica has fallen on some ice, re-breaking the leg injuries that took him out of 2011. good luck, robert
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/01/11/kubica-suffers-injury-setback-fall/