It's "I'll state it again in case you missed it" time? Oh, goody! I love this part of the discussion.
Remember when I said:
"Support for a position is often contingent upon the manner in which the main figure advocating that position behaves. I support the idea of "freedom for the oppressed" but I would not support someone who thought "let's get freedom for the oppressed by punching nuns in the face" (assuming for the moment that punching nuns in the face was even remotely effective at ending oppression).
To put that in the form of a weather-worn axiom: The end does not justify the means.
Everything that you are trying to "accomplish" has already been accomplished by the various mainline tech sites posting news stories about this on their front pages."
Yeah. That was great. I think I'm having a moment.
And let's not ignore:
Why is there like 10 or so guys in this thread who say "its wrong" BUT....this, that, and the other.....
Its plain wrong and deciets the customer.Period!
Look up the difference between "abstract thinking" and "concrete thinking" and you will understand why people are failing to understand and accept your "points".