- Jun 8, 2003
- 14,387
- 480
- 126
Happy, I think your title is a bit overboard.
Ok i agree ,opologize to the members and changed it.
thanks for your input.
Happy, I think your title is a bit overboard.
Rebadges are most of the time customer rip-off's. Someone will have a 5750/70 and see 6750/70 and auto think a better video card.. HDMI 1.3 to 1.4 is not a compelling enough upgrade to warrant a relabeling.
This is true, believe it or not there are plenty of people out there without our knowledge of video cards, that are being ripped off by this 6770/5770 fiasco.
And what evidence have you used to come to this conclusion?
What constitutes being "ripped off" in this context?
Come on tincart, give it a rest. Customers are being decieved/ripped off and its not right.
Come on tincart, give it a rest. Customers are being decieved/ripped off and its not right.
Proof? Link?
Were customers being ripped off when they bought a 9800GT?
Proof? Link?
Post #1 for starters.
It shows that the Anandtech staff also thinks this is wrong and wants video card customers and there readers to know.:thumbsup:
Their biggest concern is pricing and that particular issue has yet to be settled.
Well a quick check on newegg or my first post seems to differ.
I said this earlier in this thread, if the price was 100 bucks or so ,I would not have a problem with this card but to charge 20$, 30$ or in some cases 40$AR is not right.
I have allready owned a 5750 overclocked to 5700 speeds why would I side grade to a 6770? I have a much faster card now anyway.
edit: Say I still had a 5750 and was not knowledgable about video cards, the suppossed upgrade from a 5750 to a 6770 sounds great but WE all know its not.
I don't understand the motivation for this. As CU has stated above, "protesting" is different from arguing with reasons, which is what he is doing. Not all protests are arguments, and not all arguments are protests.
Further, why do you consistently come to the defense of the OP? It would make sense to me if you were offering rebuttals to the arguments against the OP, but you are not. You are the one protesting the fact that consistent arguments are being made against the OP.
Finally, why should CU having problems with the thread result in him reporting it? If he thinks there are factual errors or mistaken claims being made, isn't the appropriate action to present reasonable counter-arguments? This is, after all, a forum on the internet. Are you suggesting that when we disagree with the claims being made in a post, we should just report it instead of posting?
Wow, this is pretty bad. Are people finally going to be convinced that AMD is not some charity company that cares about customers more than shareholders?
People are showing their true colors by not condemning this in the same fashion they did the G92 rebadges.
perhaps you want some of the 6 series features added to the 5 series card 'rebadge', like steroscopic 3d, hdmi 1.4, drive 5 monitors
Ah, I'm just having trouble distinguishing whether CUlincoln is having a problem with the data, or the way it's being presented? Or is one bleeding over into the other. Because frankly, if the data is accurate, then CUlincoln should not care less about how "sensationalistic" the data is presented. Do you agree or not?
Well a quick check on newegg or my first post seems to differ.
I said this earlier in this thread, if the price was 100 bucks or so ,I would not have a problem with this card but to charge 20$, 30$ or in some cases 40$AR is not right
I have allready owned a 5750 overclocked to 5700 speeds why would I side grade to a 6770? I have a much faster card now anyway.
edit: Say I still had a 5750 and was not knowledgable about video cards, the suppossed upgrade from a 5750 to a 6770 sounds great but WE all know its not.
Well a quick check on newegg or my first post seems to differ.
I said this earlier in this thread, if the price was 100 bucks or so ,I would not have a problem with this card but to charge 20$, 30$ or in some cases 40$AR is not right.
I have allready owned a 5750 overclocked to 5700 speeds why would I side grade to a 6770? I have a much faster card now anyway.
edit: Say I still had a 5750 and was not knowledgable about video cards, the suppossed upgrade from a 5750 to a 6770 sounds great but WE all know its not.
As has already been pointed out, the two new 6770's stand in the middle of the overall field of 5770 prices. What will determine whether or not vendors are trying to mislead consumers is when a full range of 6770's is out and the average price is higher than the field of 5770's.
Sometimes I think you are being dense on purpose. I'll operate on the principle of charity and try to make myself more clear:
1. You claimed that people have been harmed by the re-badge
2. When asked who was harmed, you mentioned post #1 - your post.
3. This suggests that you are the one who has been harmed by the re-badge
4. I am asking: what, short of you having bought a 6770, would lead you to think that you have been personally harmed.
I have already dealt with this. You would be a non-prudential consumer who didn't do any research before making your purchase and I wouldn't care less about what you got. If you are suggesting that you would go out and buy a video card based entirely on its model number, then I've got a bridge to sell you.
Do you think this is a hardware upgrade? The 5 series can do the same thing and has 5 outputs to use. The Sapphire 6770 card has 3.
5770 with 5 outputs or use with 5 minitors and does 3d..........
Excluding the one model that is capable of Eyefinity 5 monitors on Newegg, the prices range from $109.99 - $159.99 for the 5770, and they're is only 2 6770's on there, and they sit right in the middle $119.99 - $124.99.
How are they "expensive" as you put? How do you know that it's not Newegg setting the price a little higher?
Who, what, how, derail, bait, spin, up, down, left, right, no matter how you see it, the fact is this rebage from a 5770 to a more expensive 6770 is FAIL.
Why defend it?