- Feb 14, 2004
- 48,880
- 5,535
- 136
The eyes and perspective on her face are off but still very good. He is missing toes on each foot, otherwise good.Freepik Mystic
The next step in realism:
View attachment 106361
View attachment 106356
View attachment 106357
View attachment 106359
Two great ones and two crap ones.
Gotta be more specific, you said 'a big bird' according to AI, so it gave you one. Try 'the sesame Street character 'Big Bird''Seems it was only a few years ago that AI was generating stuff that looked like some weird dream world abstract art and now it's photo real. Pretty freaky.
These are just some randoms I made in Grok. It's not quite right at following the descriptions and yielded some funny results, but the graphic quality is good. Considering how new that one is that's not bad. Although I wonder if it's just hooking into an existing AI like Stable Diffusion or something.
View attachment 106365
View attachment 106366
View attachment 106367
View attachment 106368
I feel like that last one would get me to commit suicide to 7 shots in the back of the head if I was in Russia.
Sneezy's under the dress.Have to admit the regular bird was funny too. It's fun to be vague just to see what it comes up with.
A couple more with more details.
View attachment 106373
While we're adding children's TV characters in weird situations...
View attachment 106375
View attachment 106376
One of the dwarves didn't make it.
How about AI being used to write books on foraging wild plants and mushrooms. Do you trust them?
We need a John Oliver report on this lol
Seriously tho, what kind of person sits there at a computer, takes the time to make a fake AI book, then markets it via a print-on-demand service? Is it mental illness? Being evil? Trolling with malicious intent? Greed? I'm just trying to imagine someone going through the whole process to create something like this...
View attachment 106797
The amount of detail in this image is incredible. Which AI was used to create it?
I know someone that tried. Dunno if it ever made it to "market". Lazy and stupid is the cause. They think there's a shortcut to life, where you can just clever yourself into ease. They see podcast "influencers", and think they just sit on their asses while money rolls in. They don't understand that for every hour of airtime, there's probably 10 hours of prep and editing, not to mention the technicals of getting a decent setup that doesn't sound like you're recording in the bathroom.Seriously tho, what kind of person sits there at a computer, takes the time to make a fake AI book, then markets it via a print-on-demand service? Is it mental illness? Being evil? Trolling with malicious intent? Greed? I'm just trying to imagine someone going through the whole process to create something like this...
They don't understand that for every hour of airtime, there's probably 10 hours of prep and editing, not to mention the technicals of getting a decent setup that doesn't sound like you're recording in the bathroom.
I have some friends who make pretty good full-time livings on social media & sites like Youtube. It's MORE than a full-time job, even with paid assistants! They feel pressure to put out content non-stop or risk falling off the map, which means income reduction. It tends to saturate your whole life...