The AMD Mantle Thread

Page 244 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0




3770K + 290X, 64 players
Better Reviews are from Guru3d and Anandtech i dont believe foreign benchmark

As far i understand is that Mantle performance get much more down in higher Res.

So far at 1080p there is around 1o to 15% improvement which was at least to expect but at 1440p or 1600p 8 to 8% and 4k it is useless.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,532
13,104
136
To be fair, Mantle doesn't really change much for high end, unless you're bottlenecked CPU wise. This will however massively help out buyers who will buy cheap CPUs instead and spend more money on video cards.

Right, how is that not high end? You get to take your high end CPU and add GPU compute power to it until you ARE CPU limited. Crossfire? Trifire? Quadfire? .. You will have to explain highend for me then?
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
Gloomy u have to know that games like BF4 there no difference in 3960x and 3770k.

As what guru3d says
The gains might now be massive, but at enthusiast level these remain to be significant and intersting gains alright. Above is the final example of how I think you guys play the game right now, at this very moment. Obviously 1440P is 2560x1440 WQHD btw and even there you'll see a 10% performance increase.

But 10% free performance is also considered as a massive achievement.

3970X is about 40-50% faster than a 4670K in Battlefield 4.




As far as 10% on top end equipment. That is decent enough.

Anyone see results using a 4670K or 8350 ?
 

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
Only in BF4. In AC4 a GTX780TI is 30% faster.



On AMD hardware. I wait for tests with an nVidia card.
Bro i tried with single GTX 780 in that campaign where dice claim 58% with CF guess what there was barely 10fps difference with settings ultra,2 Msaa @ 1080p
 

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
3970X is about 40-50% faster than a 4670K in Battlefield 4.




As far as 10% on top end equipment. That is decent enough.

Anyone see results using a 4670K or 8350 ?
Difference can be done by a bit of overclocking.Still there is no difference.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,172
2,210
136
Better Reviews are from Guru3d and Anandtech i dont believe foreign benchmark


These tests are far worse since nobody tested fully CPU bound and GPU bound in full player MP so far. Marc Sauter is one of the few who knows how to test CPUs/GPUs properly (former PCGH tester). Not to mention some noobs tested against Windows 7.
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
Difference can be done by a bit of overclocking.Still there is no difference.

A bit of overclocking on a 4670K will make up the 40-50% difference ? Of course we can't overclock the 3970X I guess

Mantle could make a huge difference in Battlefield 4 multiplayer for anyone running a 2500K, 3570K or 4670K, which is quite a few people. I'd wait to see more fully fleshed out benchmarks.

Even 10% with a 3970X & 290X is somewhat impressive, nothing amazing, but it's not negligible. That is the sort of performance difference you see posters on the forum refer to as 'crushed' when it's a lead for their favourite brand.
 
Last edited:

Gloomy

Golden Member
Oct 12, 2010
1,469
21
81
Either something is seriously wrong with AMD drivers or I've got a golden build of DX11.

Unless something has changed since [H] did their BF4 performance review (game was buggy back then so I wouldn't count it out) both AMD and Nvidia have similar enough performance.

They've revisited BF4 MP in several video card reviews since then and haven't reported anything out of the ordinary with AMD cards.

So if something seems out of line, then it's probably the review, not AMD drivers. But then again you never know. Maybe the processor is at stock.
 

DamnedLife

Member
Dec 26, 2013
101
0
0
Don't know German so can't say if that guy tested SP or MP. I'd like to see how that 3960X would compare if they had underclocked it and/or shut off some cores.
He says SP, since MP with full 64 players servers are not repeatbale... For me runinng once would be enough though, give numbers in a great match with lots of explosions in shangai and I'm content.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
A bit of overclocking on a 4670K will make up the 40-50% difference ? Of course we can't overclock the 3970X I guess

Mantle could make a huge difference in Battlefield 4 multiplayer for anyone running a 2500K, 3570K or 4670K, which is quite a few people. I'd wait to see more fully fleshed out benchmarks.

Even 10% with a 3970X & 290X is somewhat impressive, nothing amazing, but it's not negligible. That is the sort of performance difference you see posters on the forum refer to as crushed when it's a lead for their favourite brand.

Exactly.

I'm still waiting on the 290x crossfire results.

In the end it's interesting and I didn't buy my gpus for mantle, it's just a fringe "benefit" of a yet to be seen amount.

The amount of goal post shifting, while not surprising is sad.
 

Arkadrel

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2010
3,681
2
0




3770K + 290X, 64 players



1920x1080 and a ~75% increase in performance.

Lmao that seems like quite the jump there.

I guess mantle is okay for people with 3770k that dont overclock their CPUs.


So it only lost 4 fps by going from 720 to 1080P? (so cpu limited at 720P?) them it lost around 60% FPS by using 4xMSAA?!
Early beta mantle driver doesnt like MSAA, it looks like.
 
Last edited:

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,835
5,452
136
He says SP, since MP with full 64 players servers are not repeatbale... For me runinng once would be enough though, give numbers in a great match with lots of explosions in shangai and I'm content.

OK, that makes sense. Sounds like SP isn't demanding enough to make much of a difference.
 

Gloomy

Golden Member
Oct 12, 2010
1,469
21
81
1920x1080 and a ~75% increase in performance.

Lmao that seems like quite the jump there.

I guess mantle is okay for people with 3770k that dont overclock their CPUs.

Hit me up when you get a 75% overclock on a 3770K
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,172
2,210
136
I wonder how big the gain is on a 8 core CPU like FX-8350. Considering that Mantle should scale better with cores the gain should be bigger there compared to an Intel 4/8 Quadcore, maybe a doubling is theoretically possible, even though in practical game settings with MSAA the gains are much smaller.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,532
13,104
136
Right, how is that not high end? You get to take your high end CPU and add GPU compute power to it until you ARE CPU limited. Crossfire? Trifire? Quadfire? .. You will have to explain highend for me then?


- Aaaand:

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_mantle_preview,2.html

"On massively CPU limited situations like low/medium quality settings / low resolutions or even Multi-GPU setup, that's where the gain easily can get 30 even 40%. As such Mantle will benefit low-end and mainstream processor based PCs the most. But even at Enthusiast class, it will make a difference."

Lets dumb it down :

" low/medium quality settings / low resolutions or even Multi-GPU setup, that's where the gain easily can get 30 even 40%"

"easily can get 30 even 40%"

"easily"

"Multi-GPU setup"

"Enthusiast"

Ill be looking forward to reading the troll-spin that will turn that into a massive fail. Have a go at it guys.
 

sontin

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2011
3,273
149
106
As long as there is no comparision to nVidia it's so hilarious to read the hype material.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
BANG.
Slam dunk for bf4. That is damn great news. Everyone is happy ! Now give me my driver
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,532
13,104
136
1920x1080 and a ~75% increase in performance.

Lmao that seems like quite the jump there.

I guess mantle is okay for people with 3770k that dont overclock their CPUs.


Early beta mantle driver doesnt like MSAA, it looks like.

Strong first showing.. need to complete the picture though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |