ASM-coder
Member
- Jan 12, 2014
- 193
- 0
- 0
Interesting, and welcome!
Congrats on the release and I think a lot of us are looking forward to the future possibilities.
IMO the reviews did not tell that Severs was empty or full .Where do you get the idea that the server is empty? Pure speculation on your part? The wording of the page roughly translated seems to indicate that there were in fact 64 players on the server. Nowhere was it stated that it was an empty server.
Where do you get the idea that the server is empty? Pure speculation on your part?
Though I'm not here for PR, just noticed that this was the most active forum discussing Mantle and a lot of good posts here, though also some with some misconceptions or errors on them as well that I can try and help correct.
Sir it will be really kind of u answer that why there so much difference in ur CF result where DICE claim 58% of improvement but here it is a different story.Though I'm not here for PR, just noticed that this was the most active forum discussing Mantle and a lot of good posts here, though also some with some misconceptions or errors on them as well that I can try and help correct.
I was thinking CF or nothing. Wrong thinking. I edited my post.Dumb question perhaps, but why not?
BTW: Pclab.pl wrote that they used a 64-man server.
Google-translation:
Where do you get the idea that the server is empty? Pure speculation on your part? The wording of the page roughly translated seems to indicate that there were in fact 64 players on the server. Nowhere was it stated that it was an empty server.
yes.................but it is advantage to Nvidia.
BTW:
nVidia cards are much faster in the MP pf BF4:
http://pclab.pl/art55953.html
A GTX780TI should be 50% faster than a 290X. I said it in the Star Swarm thread:
Mantle is more a fix for AMD's poor DX driver quality than a fix to DX at all.
Lol?
That site shows numbers from the SP and MP. And in the SP the 290X is faster than the GTX780GHz edition.
So, your problem is that the numbers from the MP part is not in favour for AMD?
Though I'm not here for PR, just noticed that this was the most active forum discussing Mantle and a lot of good posts here, though also some with some misconceptions or errors on them as well that I can try and help correct.
There are none or rare people that pair i3 with GTX 780 or R9 290X.Their performance numbers respect to Nvidia have ZERO credibility. In fact, they bias is so clear that I don't doubt they made up that charts for their "NV drivers are better campaign".
Explain this:
An i3 is having the same performance as the i7 @ MP with MANTLE. Despite that bm being a highly threaded one, and the i3 does not even have turbo.
And the funniest part: they show the 780 being faster over a dual-core G3220 when they pointed in a previous review that NV cards didnt do well on dual cores ROFL. Link
Though I'm not here for PR, just noticed that this was the most active forum discussing Mantle and a lot of good posts here, though also some with some misconceptions or errors on them as well that I can try and help correct.
Lol?
That site shows numbers from the SP and MP. And in the SP the 290X is faster than the GTX780GHz edition.
So, your problem is that the numbers from the MP part is not in favour for AMD?
There non or rare people that pair i3 with GTX 780 or R9 290X.
Yeah, I was also about to point that out. The 290X was faster in SP while the GTX 780 was quite a bit faster in MP. I'd attribute that to the heavily multi threaded DX11 drivers that NV has, and AMD doesn't.
So far there is only 1 review that has compared R9 290X using Mantle vs GTX 780 .So answer is yes for now.Right...so DX11's multi-threading is supposed to be better than Mantle's now?