No. Bitcoin's VALUE comes from the ability to revolutionise the economy.
You are not grasping the bigger picture. Bitcoin is just one part of the economical equation. Because BTC is deflationary in nature, and it will only go up in price(not in value, because it is not quantifiable) that very principle allows us to move away from: Using Natural resources as a means of profit, reducing the manufacturing to the absolute minimum required, and making everything possibly as SUSTAINABLE as possible. And most importantly.
I'm not sure how Bitcoin really changes anything by itself and you really do need to provide a good explanation of how exactly it's supposed to achieve any of what you claim is a natural result of wider adoption of Bitcoin. Further there's nothing that stops utilization of natural resources from being profitable. The mere fact that they can be extracted and transformed into something else that humans value more makes that endeavor more profitable.
I answer: because Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, are the FIRST socio-economic projects that are completely independent from any form of government, be it banks, financial institutions, or real Governments and nobody can affect its VALUE.
I'm not sure how you can claim that no one can affect its value when we see that happening all of the time. Governments allowing or banning it have caused huge fluctuations in its valuation. Anyone who could pull off a 51% attack can greatly affect the value of Bitcoin.
Previously, we built our Economy based on natural resources, and currency was just abstract layer, as a measure for wealth. Everything grew up from this principle - fight over natural resources.
Currency has no value without an underlying economy that accepts it as a means of exchange. If no stores take Bitcoin and you can't get anyone else to accept it, does it matter how much you have? Similarly if there were a global disaster that halved production of every good and service, the value of Bitcoin doesn't remain stable. There's less available for purchase and the same amount of Bitcoin. It's relative value decreases.
Now, thanks to the principle that Currency has two key things: its "nobody's", and its value is not quantifiable, we can rewrite the whole economy, and built it around ethical principles: We don't need to compete for natural resources, we don't need to use them for profit, we can switch from making "profit" to creating value on this planet, in order to increase the value of the currency that we use.
This reads like utter poppycock. What do you mean it's "nobody's" when each Bitcoin is owned by exactly one person. I suppose you could say that the system/network doesn't belong to any one person, but that's not really any different than a credit union which collectively belongs to its members.
Similarly the value is always quantifiable because any exchange of Bitcoin for any good or service is an exact measurement (quantification) of the value. The value of the system itself is more difficult to pin down with an exact number, but we can still value it based on how well it serves the purposes it exists for and if nothing else can be compared to historical measurements against other systems to provide a relative sense of value.
Regardless of what kind of currency is used, there's not going to be a fundamental shift in human behavior. Bitcoin does nothing to stop humans from competing over natural resources. Profit is merely a reward for creating value because it's a means of judging whether the supposed "value" you've created is actually worth anything to anyone else. It also ensures that resources aren't wasted because engaging in unprofitable activities naturally removes the ability to sustain that activity and continue doing it, at least until there's no more investment to feed it.
How do we make value? By creating stuff that is meaningful for our lives: making technology more sustainable, creating lower impact on the planet, making everything more efficient, feeding people, making them healthy, making food more healthier. Doing more with less. Earning more, with less.
THAT is the difference.
This discussion already is very radical. And yet, I even have not written the most radical economical principle that is required for making this type of economy work.
Somewhere you've conflated a notion that Bitcoin automatically promotes environmentalism, which I don't think is true at all. In fact, a lot of people argue that the environmental impact from it is horrible, but that's neither here nor there for this argument. I think you should realize that the argument falls flat on its face because we've had people interested in more sustainable technologies for decades now well before Bitcoin came into existence. Similarly there has always been a drive to increase efficiency and provide more food (or other goods to people) because doing so generates a larger profit. Profit is what ultimately drives all of this behavior as well as curtails unproductive behavior. Decrying it or thinking you can eliminate it is just foolish nonsense.
Really the only way to get more environmentalist behavior or thinking out of people is to make them value it more than the other things they value which have lead to economic activity that isn't as good for the environment. You can try all you want to make healthier food, or to try to convince people that they should eat it, but good luck getting around the dopamine response to potato chips and soda.
I'm not sure what other more radical economic principle is required, but I have a feeling it doesn't work any better than anything else you've proposed. Bitcoin or any cryptocurrency like it is merely a currency that can function without the need of a traditional banking system. Bitcoin also isn't subject to government control in the sense that more of it can't be created on demand as with fiat currencies, but there's absolutely no reason that a cryptocurrency couldn't be created to function in a manner similar to traditional fiat currencies in that regard.
This notion that it will revolutionize the economy or change human behavior is as ridiculous as the notion that Bitcoin is nothing but a worthless scam. It's just a different and rather novel solution to an age old problem that humanity has had and like all of our previous solutions comes with its own set of positives and negatives.