Representative Gowdy may have a story to unravel that will be the biggest of my lifetime. This time, I'm paying attention.
Lol. biggest story of your lifetime?!. What are you..8 years old?
Representative Gowdy may have a story to unravel that will be the biggest of my lifetime. This time, I'm paying attention.
lolThey define intelligence as trust in Obama.
Yep. But I'd be a lot more pissed about Benghazi if the lies were to spread a false flag concept. This I consider politics, much as Bush when he told us that the British government has learned that Saddam tried to buy yellow cake uranium (of which he already had several hundred tons!) from Niger. While true on the face of it, we know (and Bush knew when he made that speech) that this story was in fact mostly an allegation based on forgeries by a French agent designed to ultimately discredit the proposed invasion.lol
"Nothing to see here,only an embassy destroyed and the Ambassador and staff killed,mutilated and tortured..eh..it's a nothingburger."
This is how they're trying to spin it.
Oh..and all the main news outlets were given propaganda to spread..outright lies.
but it's ok..
No. Put down the Foxpipe. There was no embassy in Benghazi, not was there mutilation or torture.lol
"Nothing to see here,only an embassy destroyed and the Ambassador and staff killed,mutilated and tortured..eh..it's a nothingburger."
This is how they're trying to spin it.
Oh..and all the main news outlets were given propaganda to spread..outright lies.
but it's ok..
Some major fuck-ups occurred in Benghazi, which resulted in an ambassador being murdered (first one since the Carter era) as well as three other brave Americans losing their lives. Heads should roll over that. But I see no reason to assume that it goes up to Obama or even to Hillary, and it MIGHT have seemed a legitimate risk at the time.
By that standard the Watergate break-in must have seemed reasonable, the Watergate cover-up must have seemed reasonable, Clinton's nailing an intern in the Oval Office must have seemed reasonable, etc.It obviously must have seemed reasonable at the time or it wouldn't have been done the way it was, rendering the rest of your post bullshit.
It's an imperfect world full of imperfect knowledge & forces beyond our control, like Islamist militias in Benghazi & all the other perps who've attacked the American diplomatic corps in the past.
It'll happen in the future, too, despite best efforts to avoid it.
Look! Moving goalposts! First you claimed that libs opposed supporting the mujahedin at at the time, now point to evaluations made after the whole thing was over to support the original assertion.
Desperately lame.
Beat me to it.
So no link, no acknowledgement of Iran and AQ being separate entities. Thanks for playing Fern, you may return to your tin foil now.
It obviously must have seemed reasonable at the time or it wouldn't have been done the way it was, rendering the rest of your post bullshit.
-snip-
Yours is another post I don't understand.
WTH does Iran have to do with anything?
Links are easy to find. Knock yourself out.
Fern
I think he told you to go fuck yourself. Just a guess because I wouldn't want to put words in his mouth.Yes, clearly you are not understanding so I'll give it another shot, going slow this time.
Unrelated, I now have an overwhelming desire to watch Charlie Wilson's War again.
Probably my favorite Philip Seymour Hoffman scene ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ_4m2ocxhI
I miss him.
No "goal posts" have been moved at all.
I don't understand why you even claim that?
Nor did I say anywhere that libs opposed supporting the mujahedin back when it was happening.
I think you should reread what I posted.
Fern
That's really an odd position. I can't count how many times I've heard liberals complain about our weapon shipments to Afghanistan when they were fighting off the Russians.
"Seemed reasonable"?
In the run up to the attack the embassy security staff was reduced in spite of requests to enhance it and contrary to growing security concerns prompting other nations/orgs to abandon the place.
"Reasonable' for proggies is something normal people can't understand.
Fern
I think he told you to go fuck yourself. Just a guess because I wouldn't want to put words in his mouth.
Great movie, great documentary, and great book. Clearly a story what one man (with help) can do.
My apologies. I thought your ignorance was willful. Instead, it appears your reading skills are as juvenile as your math. Hint: that one can train a parrot to repeat Republican talking points doesn't make the parrot Republican. It makes it a mindless tool for spreading propaganda.
And you still failed to address a single point I made. You are a joke.
Lol Benghazi!
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/07...-completely-baseless-benghazi-conspiracy.html
And so ends the Benghazi conspiracy!
Note the transcripts at the bottom as well as who released them.
Funny way to do it, counter productive even, but come now the facade is unnecessary. I think we both know you're no stranger to putting things in other guys mouths. Would it count as sucking diction? Debatable, but I will admit to being impressed with you even attempting to speak for others. With your cranium as firmly embedded as it is, it just sounds incredibly difficult, certainly uncomfortable.
Big difference is, at least on the forums, these "evil right wingers" you all constantly crow about are very accepting of the modern progressives and having open debate.
You mean who is responsible for not occupying Libya? You do realize it's a foreign country, and we don't just decide to have forces on the ground without their government's permission?