That is sufficient reason to act here, although if the President decides not severely limit his response it's not going to hurt my feelings.
Yeah, he is sad . . .
That is sufficient reason to act here, although if the President decides not severely limit his response it's not going to hurt my feelings.Because as Colin Powell said, "You break it, you own it".
Yeah, he is sad . . .My hats off to you sir.
That is sufficient reason to act here, although if the President decides not severely limit his response it's not going to hurt my feelings.
Yeah, he is sad . . .
"Everyone else" being a certain special someone currently incarcerated as aStill waiting on you to explain your what is worse about claiming Ollie told you about OBL. Was it deliberate trolling or incredible stupidity for believing a chain email? Either way, you look (as usual) like a stupid troll.
Is matt1970 an alt of yours? You two spend a lot of time defending each other...very odd. Especially since everyone else agrees that you are wrong.
"Everyone else" being a certain special someone currently incarcerated as a
political prisoner"?
Fantastic post. Fox can fool you all of the time. I wonder if you know where ISIL is and I wonder if you could find Benghazi on a map.Bump 9/11 is coming up.What happens this year?
PS: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...yed-response-to-terrorist-attack-us-security/
I'm not saying I like the way that news is presented.
but what's really happening?
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/09/0...ressure-me-over-fox-colleagues-benghazi-story
Censorship.
Ok..These people are violating Amendment 1 and 2..the very first ones! seriously.
My theory is that Obama was arming ISIS through Bhenghazi and the ambassador was going to blow the whistle.
Remember this: You can fool some of the people some of the time,and you can fool some of the people all the time;but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Bump 9/11 is coming up.What happens this year?
PS: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...yed-response-to-terrorist-attack-us-security/
I'm not saying I like the way that news is presented.
but what's really happening?
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/09/0...ressure-me-over-fox-colleagues-benghazi-story
Censorship.
Ok..These people are violating Amendment 1 and 2..the very first ones! seriously.
My theory is that Obama was arming ISIS through Bhenghazi and the ambassador was going to blow the whistle.
Remember this: You can fool some of the people some of the time,and you can fool some of the people all the time;but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Fantastic post. Fox can fool you all of the time. I wonder if you know where ISIL is and I wonder if you could find Benghazi on a map.
How debunked? The operators say they were told to stand down. Nobody denies they were told to stand down; the only denials are that this order originated from Obama or State (which isn't even in the CIA's chain of command.) The issue is who ultimately gave the order, and in that the guest is no doubt correct. Sending only three shooters can easily be counterproductive.Fox's Newest Benghazi Conspiracy Immediately Debunked By Fox Guest
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/04/foxs-newest-benghazi-conspiracy-immediately-deb/200654
The "stand down" is real for the 3 men. It just didn't originate from high in the chain of command. It's also a sound call to make when resources are so sparse and you don't know !@#$.
Bump 9/11 is coming up.What happens this year?
PS: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...yed-response-to-terrorist-attack-us-security/
I'm not saying I like the way that news is presented.
but what's really happening?
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/09/0...ressure-me-over-fox-colleagues-benghazi-story
Censorship.
Ok..These people are violating Amendment 1 and 2..the very first ones! seriously.
My theory is that Obama was arming ISIS through Bhenghazi and the ambassador was going to blow the whistle.
Remember this: You can fool some of the people some of the time,and you can fool some of the people all the time;but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
How lame. The order was to wait, not to stand down, as the Fox link clearly indicates.
proof?
Read the link.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/04/foxs-newest-benghazi-conspiracy-immediately-deb/200654
Like such trivia really matters, anyway. Benghazi! the scandal was a partisan hoax the moment it passed through Mitten's lips.
So what was the hoax? The facility was attacked. The CIA was using the complex to facilitate running weapons to Syrian rebels (who are believed now to have sold Steven Sotloff to ISIS groups) who now make up part of ISIS.
I haven't read much of this whole thread but my guess is it leftwing nuts whining about a republican conspiracy to make obama look bad.... but my God to deny that Benghazi was a significant incident in the continuing turmoil that is the middle east.... well it is just plain Liberal Brain Defectiveness.
So what was the hoax? The facility was attacked. The CIA was using the complex to facilitate running weapons to Syrian rebels (who are believed now to have sold Steven Sotloff to ISIS groups) who now make up part of ISIS.
I haven't read much of this whole thread but my guess is it leftwing nuts whining about a republican conspiracy to make obama look bad.... but my God to deny that Benghazi was a significant incident in the continuing turmoil that is the middle east.... well it is just plain Liberal Brain Defectiveness.
If you haven't read this whole thread then you haven't been following what's going on so unless you have something to add of value besides your own conspiracies and fact less opinions, how about just shutting the fuck up
What have I missed? You trying to squeeze your head farther up obamas ass? After 770+ posts in this thread I did not think it could go up any further... so I got one wrong.
Lol! Says the guy that admitted to not following said 770 posts!
Feel free to start here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2334413