Bias and manipulation are the problem. If there's little to none of that, why would we have an issue? It's conservative dogma that needs to be shielded by lies. Liberalism doesn't have a problem with the universe whatever its shape happens to be.
Wait, did this thread go from insulting Gowdy's appearance to being totally OK with him?
Someone posts a bunch of bullshit about me like I get my info from Fox and Drudge, listen to Rush and am anxiously awaiting impeachment then decides to be forum police and if I don't answer his questions I am trolling? Fuck off.
Dodge #4!
You do know what this discussion is about right? Then either put up or shut up.
Drudge report probably, having seen your posts here. You continued lack of facts in almost all of your posts seems just like Drudge. Your anger issues also show a part of Rush too, do you listen to him as well?
So please explain what this new investigation will find?
Please explain what you find wrong about the three previous official investigations. Be specific with facts, not made-up lies.
It's really interesting that you and the others all keep posting about how important this is, and how bad it is, but never have anything valid to point out.
I will help you all. Here all three official government reports all saying no conspiracy. The last one was even lead by the GOP, and had a GOP majority, so you can't even claim the Democrats wrote it or covered anything up.
2012 State Dept report
2014 Senate intel Committee report
2014 House Intel committee report
To Fern, boomerang, Matt1970, and all the other trolls that are anxiously awaiting a magical impeachment from this, point out how all three of these reports did not cover everything that you claim happened.
Because once again (I know, you all do this all the time) you all are basically admitting you are lying and trolling, by refusing to post anything of substance.
The reports are released....due your homework and tell us where the reports are wrong, and document with evidence.
First you said I get my info from Fox news, then you said "Drudge report probably", now you have to backtrack and say my posts are like Drudge. Want to make any final adjustments?
No, once again you prove you can't read.
Since we all realize you are reading impaired, I will make it easy for you.
Get info from doesn't equal post links from.
I realize you have logic issues, but it really isn't that hard to figure out, is it?
I said you get info from fox...i didn't say post links from. Just like you probably read drudge and listen to rush.
Once again you fail at logic. Just like your fail troll attempt claim that I supported Obama since I didn't post in every thread that citizen him. You were wrong then, you are wrong now.
So what are you posting abut Benghazi? What in those three reports don't you believe? Facts please. Or are you admitting you are just trolling the thread?
I post links to support my claims, you claim I get my info from Drudge. Are those dots a little to far apart for you to connect? What other evidence would you have that I get my info from Drudge?
Someone posts a bunch of bullshit about me like I get my info from Fox and Drudge, listen to Rush and am anxiously awaiting impeachment then decides to be forum police and if I don't answer his questions I am trolling? Fuck off.
Garfield's specific allegation was that Matt got his information from Fox News. He then changed it to be the Drudge Report. Claiming that no one took Garfield's claim to be that Matt posts links to Drudge rather misses the point that Garfield is arguing - that only his news sources are acceptable.Yeah, have to agree. He can't read. No one in here took that as you post links to drudge, simply that your posts read like something ripped from Drudge.
Here is what Fern, Matt1970, and boomerang are getting their "info" (I use the term loosely, since they are more lies then information)
Link
Faux News and their "coverage"
So fair and balanced? LOL
Drudge report probably, having seen your posts here. You continued lack of facts in almost all of your posts seems just like Drudge. Your anger issues also show a part of Rush too, do you listen to him as well?
So please explain what this new investigation will find?
Please explain what you find wrong about the three previous official investigations. Be specific with facts, not made-up lies.
It's really interesting that you and the others all keep posting about how important this is, and how bad it is, but never have anything valid to point out.
I will help you all. Here all three official government reports all saying no conspiracy. The last one was even lead by the GOP, and had a GOP majority, so you can't even claim the Democrats wrote it or covered anything up.
2012 State Dept report
2014 Senate intel Committee report
2014 House Intel committee report
To Fern, boomerang, Matt1970, and all the other trolls that are anxiously awaiting a magical impeachment from this, point out how all three of these reports did not cover everything that you claim happened.
Because once again (I know, you all do this all the time) you all are basically admitting you are lying and trolling, by refusing to post anything of substance.
The reports are released....due your homework and tell us where the reports are wrong, and document with evidence.
Garfield's specific allegation was that Matt got his information from Fox News. He then changed it to be the Drudge Report. Claiming that no one took Garfield's claim to be that Matt posts links to Drudge rather misses the point that Garfield is arguing - that only his news sources are acceptable.
I get my info from Drudge because I troll threads?LOL...this is too easy. Because you troll threads?
You are more than welcome to dispute my data but that really hasn't worked out well for you so far.Because most of what you post is wrong?
(Hello, "not posting in a thread is proof you support that thread" is such a great example of your lack of logic and admission of your trolling)
So again, what is your complaint about the three reports already released? Just what are you claiming is wrong about them?
You keep posting in this thread complaining, but yet (once again), you refuse to post anything of substance. So tell us why those three reports are wrong with specifics. Otherwise, you are just trolling as usual.
Matt1970 consistently outright trolls threads and his posts are consistent with listening to the right-wing propaganda machine, AKA Fox, Drudge, Rush, etc,etc, etc. his MO is to troll with whatever is the faux outrage of the week, without any regard for reality and truth.
He is free to post real evidence regarding Benghazi, but he outright refuses.
Wouldn't someone who gets his info from Fox, Drudge, Rush etc,etc, etc have all kinds of things to post about Benghazi, yet my absence of posting about it is enraging you.
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
I think that is further proof you are pulling shit out of your ass.
Once again troll.... what is wrong with the three existing official reports?
We have asked multiple times, and you refuse to answer. It couldn't have anything to do that you have no reason? Faux news told you it was a cover up, and they never said why, so you don't know why either.
Look at the posting guidelines. Off topic posting is against the rules. If you don't give a reason, you are pretty much admitting you are trolling the thread, and you will be reported.
So again, post evidence the three government reports are wrong, and bail out of the thread.
Oh, you really need to work on those anger issues still.
Wouldn't someone who gets his info from Fox, Drudge, Rush etc,etc, etc have all kinds of things to post about Benghazi, yet my absence of posting about it is enraging you.
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
I think that is further proof you are pulling shit out of your ass.
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
Why won't you post something about Benghazi!!!! WAAAAAAAAAA
So you admit you have nothing, and are trolling?
Once again, we can all see matt1970's refusal to post anything of significance.
I linked the reports... you are trolling. Last time, post why you disagree with those reports or bail out of the thread, or you can explain to the mode about your off topic trolling.
I am going to get taddled on.......
You started this shit you little bastard calling me out in post 824. In in the words of Sheriff Buford T. Justice, "Now fuck off"
Give it a rest please.And once again, you refuse to post on-topic. Troll on. You've been asked many times, and outright refused.
Goes to show that you are trolling, and know (and care) nothing about Benghazi.
Give it a rest please.
A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.
The House Intelligence Committee report was released with little fanfare on the Friday before Thanksgiving week. Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
Well, all the far-right trolls, birthers and truthers can move on to their next faux news inspired alleged coverup.
Yet another House Intel report on Benghazi
Yup, official investigation #7 (!!!!) found no conspiracy, and nothing wrong. Sorry guys, you were lied to by the GOP propaganda machine once again. Thanks for playing.
So how does it feel to be lied to by Fox News and the GOP? Anyone going to stop blindly believing whatever they tell you? LOL. I guess you can hope investigation #8 finds something right?