Ok so you don't think lying to a grand jury about blow jobs is ok and Clinton should have been punished. Cool.
Ok so you don't think lying to a grand jury about blow jobs is ok and Clinton should have been punished. Cool.Strawman.
For myself; this is a big concern. Will the government try to find out what happened and will they actually release that info.
As information is being dragged/trickled out; it seems that the Obama administration is fighting such release of information al the way from the first 5 minutes until now or sending out false directions.
But as more info is being released; the dirty story and 20/20 hindsight shows that it seems that there was serious misdirection and a hush over attempt on revealing information.
The attitude is/was that "We know what is best - you do not"
As to your second sentence bolded; I am sure that they will do lip service.
But without a disclosure (full) on the first; how well can the American people determine is being done on the second item.
Even now they are closing embassies around the region because of a threat assessment. The embassies are there to support US interests and citizens.
When in our history did we shutter embassies except when in wartime. Are we now at war with Kuwait or Jordan?
Initially State seems to have dropped the ball and wanted to blame others based on statements from that arena.
Then the blame on a video; when information has shown otherwise and was known before the statements were made
The cover up (from my POV) of being concerned about intruding on sovereign territory so much that the risk of Americans and an ambassador was not worth an attempt at air cover.
Now the issue of arms flow is surfacing.
Let me do a cliffs on your post.
"Blah, blah Bush. Bush, blah, blah. More comparisons to Bush. Bush, Bush, Bush. My heroes are doing a great job. I'm a better 'murican than you."
Oh and you really made my day painting yourself as some kind of non-partisan deity. Pathetic.
No, he pretty much summed you up in a couple of short sentences.
He described you both to a T.
Yep, I am always diverting and blaming Bush. You got me.
The answers have been available since December of last year in the report that you didn't read that I linked to multiple times in another Benghazi thread.
It's funny what happens when an ambassador is killed isn't it dipshit.
Well I'm sure President Romney will get to the bottom of it. After his mandate of a win in the '12 election, it's only a matter of time before he solves the mystery of Benghazi.
Just FYI, nobody gives half a shit about Benghazi who isn't already a die-hard Fox News Republican.
Just FYI, nobody gives half a shit about Benghazi who isn't already a die-hard Fox News Republican. It will have 0 impact on any future elections, other than maybe driving voter turnout a little, but since the people who would care about Benghazi are already frothing at having been beaten by Obama again, I doubt there's much more by way of gains for the GOP to make in that area.
You're right that it will show up if/when Hilary runs though, since that's the whole reason it's being pushed so hard and so long.
Just FYI, nobody gives half a shit about Benghazi who isn't already a die-hard Fox News Republican. It will have 0 impact on any future elections, other than maybe driving voter turnout a little, but since the people who would care about Benghazi are already frothing at having been beaten by Obama again, I doubt there's much more by way of gains for the GOP to make in that area.
You're right that it will show up if/when Hilary runs though, since that's the whole reason it's being pushed so hard and so long.
Just FYI, nobody gives half a shit about Benghazi who isn't already a die-hard Fox News Republican. It will have 0 impact on any future elections, other than maybe driving voter turnout a little, but since the people who would care about Benghazi are already frothing at having been beaten by Obama again, I doubt there's much more by way of gains for the GOP to make in that area.
You're right that it will show up if/when Hilary runs though, since that's the whole reason it's being pushed so hard and so long.
Benghazi is an issue that may be used to expose an illegal arms transfer.
Sorry to upset you all so much by telling the truth. Nobody cares about Benghazi outside of the Fox News bubble world in which Romney was certain to win right up until he oh-so-bafflingly lost.
Cue the liberals whining "Reagan got away with illegal arms transfers. You're only going after Obama because he's black." in 3...2...1...
Theyll conveniently forget about all the hearings and Poindexter and North taking the bullet for him and Bush Sr.
Sorry to upset you all so much by telling the truth. Nobody cares about Benghazi outside of the Fox News bubble world in which Romney was certain to win right up until he oh-so-bafflingly lost.
1) It's coming up on the anniversary, making it possible to do retrospectives, not because of some BIG NEW INFORMATION; 2) There's money in it, and CNN is nothing if not hacky entertainment 'news'That why cnn and other news sources are now covering it? oh and former obama voter here...
1) It's nearly the anniversary, not some BIG NEW INFORMATION; 2) There's money in it, and CNN is nothing if not hacky entertainment 'news'
What "other news sources"? Wall Street Journal? New York Times? Washington Post? Or just Fox News and some local newspapers reprinting AP stories on slows news days?
"Laugh at me" all you want, I'm not the one huffing and puffing about a non-story and deluding myself into thinking it's going to matter electorally.
yep, nothing to see here. just cia agents selling weapons to al qaeda in syria. move along, non-story...
...is still a story...
Sorry to upset you all so much by telling the truth. Nobody cares about Benghazi outside of the Fox News bubble world in which Romney was certain to win right up until he oh-so-bafflingly lost.
LOLWell I'm sure President Romney will get to the bottom of it. After his mandate of a win in the '12 election, it's only a matter of time before he solves the mystery of Benghazi.