The Benghazi Story goes critical

Page 54 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Seems like a pretty straightforward statement to my eyes.

"Our investigation uncovered substantial evidence of mismanagement, poor judgment and institutional inertia, leading to the belief by many tax-exempt applicants that the IRS targeted them based on their political viewpoints,” Kadzik wrote. “But poor judgment is not a crime. We found no evidence that any IRS official acted based on political, discriminatory, corrupt or other inappropriate motives that would support a criminal prosecution. We also found no evidence that any official involved in the handling of tax-exempt applications or IRS leadership attempted to obstruct justice. Based on the evidence developed in this investigation and the recommendation of experienced career prosecutors and supervising attorneys at the Department, we are closing our investigation and will not seek any criminal charges.”

http://www.accountingtoday.com/news...scandal-without-criminal-charges-76198-1.html
Would be interesting to know if the FBI considers giving the names of big donors to progressive attack groups to be mismanagement, poor judgment or institutional inertia considering that is an actual felony.

As long as Hillary Clinton, walks the earth, there will be Benghazi. She failed the people at that embassy, and contributed to their deaths. When she realized she failed them, she conceived a lie, to cover it up.

She is everything that is the worst of a person.

-John
I have an extremely low opinion of the Hildabeast but I don't think Secretaries of State set security levels at individual diplomatic missions, even those in the countries of most interest at the time. That seems to me to be a fairly specialized thing more suitable for lifers. I realize I could be wrong here, but so far I've seen nothing to show me I am and given that we have a majority in Congress who'd really like to show me I am wrong, I suspect it would have come out by now.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Would be interesting to know if the FBI considers giving the names of big donors to progressive attack groups to be mismanagement, poor judgment or institutional inertia considering that is an actual felony.

Please. That bit of slimy innuendo has been debunked many times. A person at the IRS mistakenly released information prematurely while the applications in question were being processed, information that was correctly released anyway once the application was approved.

The sensitive information was mistakenly sent to the IRS in the first place who just sent out what they received from the groups. The govt settled with NOM for $50K which is cheaper than lawyers.

You already know this.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Please. That bit of slimy innuendo has been debunked many times. A person at the IRS mistakenly released information prematurely while the applications in question were being processed, information that was correctly released anyway once the application was approved.

The sensitive information was mistakenly sent to the IRS in the first place who just sent out what they received from the groups. The govt settled with NOM for $50K which is cheaper than lawyers.

You already know this.
Amazing that all those mistakes, misjudgements, and institutional inertia always work for the Democrats' benefit, eh?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
Amazing that all those mistakes, misjudgements, and institutional inertia always work for the Democrats' benefit, eh?

And how was that mistake a benefit to dems? While you are at it why don't you tell us how the dems benefited from the IRS targeting? Hell, let's broaden it and give me some recent examples of institutional inertia that benefited the dems?
 
Last edited:

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Amazing that all those mistakes, misjudgements, and institutional inertia always work for the Democrats' benefit, eh?
It might be amazing were it true. As a wing-nut conspiracy theory, however, it's pretty unremarkable. Better luck next "scandal."
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Amazing that all those mistakes, misjudgements, and institutional inertia always work for the Democrats' benefit, eh?

I guess outing Valerie Plame was one of those same type of mistakes that also worked well for the Dems.

Oh shit--that came direct from the admin. "misjudjements or inertia" or not, there wasn't even a proxy group to hide under there....

talk about sloppy
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
And how was that mistake a benefit to dems? While you are at it why don't you tell us how the dems benefited from the IRS targeting? Hell, let's broaden it and give me some recent examples of institutional inertia that benefited the dems?
The Dems got many, many new organizations to promote their views on society using pre-tax money. A handful of their proposed organizations got turned down, but most were quickly approved. The Republicans were denied the same; the majority of clearly right-leaning groups saw their applications vanish in limbo, with no way to revise and resubmit because their applications were given no feedback or hearing. The right also saw its big money donors identified to left wing attack groups while the left's equivalent enjoyed anonymity. Those are two powerful advantages in raising money for political policy advertising.

I guess outing Valerie Plame was one of those same type of mistakes that also worked well for the Dems.

Oh shit--that came direct from the admin. "misjudjements or inertia" or not, there wasn't even a proxy group to hide under there....

talk about sloppy
That came from an anti-war career state department employee, Richard Armitage, who was working against the administration. Honestly I have never understood the idea that a government employee should be free to actively and dishonestly subvert Presidential policy while remaining anonymous. Should someone working to elect Romney be allowed to write articles claiming that Biden sent him to Syria and he determined that Assad was innocent of using WMDs without revealing that in fact his own wife sent him and Biden knew nothing about it? Would you accept this behavior directed against any of Obama's policies?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
The Dems got many, many new organizations to promote their views on society using pre-tax money. A handful of their proposed organizations got turned down, but most were quickly approved. The Republicans were denied the same; the majority of clearly right-leaning groups saw their applications vanish in limbo, with no way to revise and resubmit because their applications were given no feedback or hearing. The right also saw its big money donors identified to left wing attack groups while the left's equivalent enjoyed anonymity. Those are two powerful advantages in raising money for political policy advertising.


That came from an anti-war career state department employee, Richard Armitage, who was working against the administration. Honestly I have never understood the idea that a government employee should be free to actively and dishonestly subvert Presidential policy while remaining anonymous. Should someone working to elect Romney be allowed to write articles claiming that Biden sent him to Syria and he determined that Assad was innocent of using WMDs without revealing that in fact his own wife sent him and Biden knew nothing about it? Would you accept this behavior directed against any of Obama's policies?
You omitted "Not meant to be be a factual statement." Those tales are long on RNC talking points and way short on facts. Again.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
The Dems got many, many new organizations to promote their views on society using pre-tax money. A handful of their proposed organizations got turned down, but most were quickly approved. The Republicans were denied the same; the majority of clearly right-leaning groups saw their applications vanish in limbo, with no way to revise and resubmit because their applications were given no feedback or hearing. The right also saw its big money donors identified to left wing attack groups while the left's equivalent enjoyed anonymity. Those are two powerful advantages in raising money for political policy advertising.


That came from an anti-war career state department employee, Richard Armitage, who was working against the administration. Honestly I have never understood the idea that a government employee should be free to actively and dishonestly subvert Presidential policy while remaining anonymous. Should someone working to elect Romney be allowed to write articles claiming that Biden sent him to Syria and he determined that Assad was innocent of using WMDs without revealing that in fact his own wife sent him and Biden knew nothing about it? Would you accept this behavior directed against any of Obama's policies?

You are pathetic.
See if you can find why your statement, based off of this graph, is total bullshit. Then see if you can figure out why your claim was completely pulled from your ass even if the chart said what you wanted it to say.



Would you like to attempt to answer the question again or was that the best you've got?
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Oh shit!!! Stop the presses!! Shit just got real! New emails reveal the extent of hilarys diabolical plan to kill Americans in benghazi!

These new emails change everything and the Republicans are going to have a field day with this new info!

http://crooksandliars.com/2015/10/politico-looks-newest-clinton-emails-and

"Truly, Alexander, the younger, watched her walk in to Congress and said: 'she looks like Lisa Kudrow —you know, on Friends....'," she added.

Abedin then passed along the message to Clinton, writing, "This is a nice compliment[.] Lisa is an attractive actress!"

Clinton's response is fully redacted.

Abedin's response to that email: "[Redacted] certainly thinks you are cameron diaz!!"

Obviously she was telling Abedin about how to get Chris Stevens killed in that redacted response.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |