Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: palehorse
Israel's fight -- ours -- is Global.
We share many of the same enemies and threats...
Many of the same desires for more power and wealth that fit under the war on terror' marketing label, too.
I actually fight the battles.. you don't.
And we're both proud we've made the right decision.
The threats and our enemies are very -- VERY -- real.
I don't think there's one broad brush to paint with here. Some threats are real. Others, like the homeless guys trumpted as a major terrorist ring, are not real threats.
My understanding is that most of the detainees in Guantanamo, most of the thousands rounded up in big sweeps o 'grab every guy of military age' or bought from wardlords who regularly sold people they wanted to get rid of for illegitimate reasons or just profit from are not 'real threats'.
And among the 'real threats', there are those who are threats we didn't ask for, and those we have creeated with mistaken policies.
Whatever the overarching reasons for the "war," the contributions made in the actual battles by our own forces, and those of our allies, should never be diminished. For that reason, my point regarding Israel and its soldiers stands -- they are a great ally of mine and the U.S.
The sacrifices are real. Then again, so are the sacrifices of the Nazi troops in WWII or many terrorists today. There are larger questions about the justness of the war.
Questions you have a dog in the fight about to justify your own support of violence, but which I can ask without any need to decide one way or the other.
To some extent, we may differ more on how to deal with some 'threats'. I seem more aware of how actions to support dictators (and you can go back further to western support for enlarging and empowering the radical religous groups you are opposing) create problems for us. I've seen your limited options for dealing with things, 'kill them disarm them or expel them'. I see more options that are peaceful and better for everyone, that involve ending some wrongs done to people that you don't acknowledge much that I see.
For example, the history of the US and Iran going back to the CIA ending of democracy and installing of the Shah, giving them huge legitimate reasons to be our enemy, has been discussed here many times, but I don't recall you one time ever offering your agreement to those basic points. You only seem to see 'the enemy' and military options and ultimatums.
You seem to have the typical military outlook insofar as you intend to act with honor - and this is why you are fed a steady diet of honorable reasons why you are fighitng. You're not at all a knowing part of the 'ulterior motives' I discuss for war, but rather, arguably, a victim of the cover reasons, the pretenses and justifications, given to motivate the people who sacrifice so much for 'the cause' - and who are IMO in such a poor position to raise questions about the real purposes for the war.
Do you think Gen. Smedley Butler enjoyed saying the quote I've posted about what he discovered the 'real reasons' for wars he's led battles in were?
Much easier to not pay attention to that and stick to the noble cause. For you, at least, if not those killed and otherwise hurt.
It's al too easy, unfortunately, for well-intended people to do harm, manipulated.
Your first post, where you took no issue with the 'all Palastenians are valid targets' while objecting to the response about Israelis, spoke to the problem.
The only blood on my hands is from the taxes I pay - not from the weapon I use, or the ballot lever I pull for warmongers. You have a heavier burden you have chosen, a pool of blood that's near you every night you go to sleep, which you must justify. You have a lot of pressure to conclude that the people whose blood that is are evil and you had to kill them. That just might make you a little less than open to any other information.
My interest is in avoiding unnecessary, wrongful, violence. There are few resources for that side. The other side has a vast organization with trillions of dollars to back it.
If the most powerful military figure in the world in the last century, in his even more powerful position as President, in his farewell adddress to the nation could not influence policy away from the excesses of the vast military industry, it's not easy to do much against it. But we do what we can, and we all have the vote. And because you are someone who tries to follow honor, you can learn things. We'll see if you do. John Kerry once volunteered to kill for a bad cause - and came to lead opposition to the war.
You have some idea of moral duty, and that war can be wrong. That's something. And as you see your 'ally' JS80 say things you find abhorrent, you might ask more questions.
You might broaden your understanding of the real goal of the 'war on terror' to include reducing the Middle Eastern tyranny that feeds the violent resistance in terrorism.
You might come to consider 'social justice' a key and essential ally as the only alternative to endless violence, rather than only getting rid fo the 'current threat'.