The drought... 2 problems, one easy, the other not so much

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,844
8,309
136
#1: How many molecules of water are in 1 gallon (at, say, 70 degrees F, since the temperature will affect this, so maybe make it "approximate")?

#2: They are fighting it out politically, the super big/long oil pipeline. Why can't they/we eventually transport huge quantities of water (i.e. "sufficient" quantities) by pipelines (or canals) from areas that have abundant rainfall to areas that usually have relatively insufficient rainfall (at least Utah, Arizona, Nevada, California)?

It seems like Washington and even Oregon are drenched for much of the year, can't we get a lot of that water down to California? I haven't seen/heard discussion of this, so it's obviously difficult, but if drought conditions worsen, is it possible that this could be considered? I read something recently that scientists have determined that droughts of 200 years have occurred in this region. A severe drought of 200 years could wipe out the region, essentially, unless new methods are employed to provide water by means other than local rainfall (desalination or transport). I think I have seen discussion of hauling fresh water, dragging huge water-filled balloons behind ships! Please discuss.
 
Last edited:

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Only navigable water is controlled by the Feds. All of the water, the water that is used for consumption is controlled locally. So, unless you have those states and local authorities agreeable to providing their water, California is out of luck in getting it from anywhere but their backyard.
 

rednas

Senior member
May 26, 2010
298
0
76
If water was not piped down to socal it would not have been able to support the population there millions of people ago. Issues like this arise when a desert becomes the second largest city in the country.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
29,310
2,100
126
Keep watering your lawns. The water cycle will soon mean water for everyone!



(that has never worked and will never work because you have to can not accumulate enough to be of any use......STOP watering your lawns and let the billion dollar almond farmers owned by the pension funds waste it all)
 

rednas

Senior member
May 26, 2010
298
0
76
Keep watering your lawns. The water cycle will soon mean water for everyone!

:roll:

depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
29,310
2,100
126
#1: How many molecules of water are in 1 gallon (at, say, 70 degrees F, since the temperature will affect this, so maybe make it "approximate")?

#2: They are fighting it out politically, the super big/long oil pipeline. Why can't they/we eventually transport huge quantities of water (i.e. "sufficient" quantities) by pipelines (or canals) from areas that have abundant rainfall to areas that usually have relatively insufficient rainfall (at least Utah, Arizona, Nevada, California)?

It seems like Washington and even Oregon are drenched for much of the year, can't we get a lot of that water down to California? I haven't seen/heard discussion of this, so it's obviously difficult, but if drought conditions worsen, is it possible that this could be considered? I read something recently that scientists have determined that droughts of 200 years have occurred in this region. A severe drought of 200 years could wipe out the region, essentially, unless new methods are employed to provide water by means other than local rainfall (desalination or transport). I think I have seen discussion of hauling fresh water, dragging huge water-filled balloons behind ships! Please discuss.


CA needs to build desalinization plants and sell water to cities. You are sitting by an OCEAN of water for Heaven's sake! D:
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
29,310
2,100
126
depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.

HOA fines have been stopped by the State but local city fines might still be issued. Thats the stupid part.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
33,929
1,098
126
Why should Washington and Oregon alter their ecosystems by pumping water down to California?

California needs to either stop trying to turn a desert into a roofless greenhouse or start focusing on desalinization powered by relatively clean methods such as fission.

I support the second, but I don't see it happening.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,579
1,629
136
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.
 

Scarpozzi

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
26,389
1,778
126

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,840
617
121
Last edited:

rednas

Senior member
May 26, 2010
298
0
76
California has plenty of water it's the dumb fuck politicians that messed it up.


you are right. But the water just happens to be found hundreds of miles from where most of the people who consume it live. Also, lots of water is used for farming.
 

rednas

Senior member
May 26, 2010
298
0
76
We need a new political party; i.e The Common Sense party.

But, but desalination plants contribute to "global warming."

Here's some crap to read. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-impacts-of-relying-on-desalination/


Next thing you know they will say desalination plants are killing endangered fish.

More BS. http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Desalination-plants-a-pricey-option-if-drought-5239096.php

Run 'em on natural gas!

Everyone who either lives in California or has lived in California knows that 'common sense' is something that is severely lacking in the people who are in political office.
 

imagoon

Diamond Member
Feb 19, 2003
5,199
0
0
depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.

That pipe line destroyed the cities at the source. When it was built there were bombing to destroy it among other things.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.

Look at the costs of transporting huge volumes of gasoline and oil. That's like 1-2 gallons per person per day. You're talking about hundreds of times the capacity of oil transport.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,844
8,309
136
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.
I don't know where they get those figures, but in the heat of summer (when I water my vegetables) I've never been into triple figures in my gallons/day. Maybe they are figuring water consumption of a county as a whole divided by its population. Industry/government would use a big chunk.
 
Last edited:

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,844
8,309
136
California has plenty of water it's the dumb fuck politicians that messed it up.
I don't know, man, you should do more research before saying that. I'm not saying that politicians haven't fucked things up, but the region is arid. Read this:

Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water
That pipe line destroyed the cities at the source. When it was built there were bombing to destroy it among other things.
That story is elegantly related in the linked book.

you are right. But the water just happens to be found hundreds of miles from where most of the people who consume it live. Also, lots of water is used for farming.
In recent memory, there's not been near enough water to supply California's agriculture to anywhere near the tune they want to use.
Look at the costs of transporting huge volumes of gasoline and oil. That's like 1-2 gallons per person per day. You're talking about hundreds of times the capacity of oil transport.
Yeah, I figured that the difference in scale there is what distinguishes transport by pipeline of water from that of oil.

Still, presumably the technical/industrial capabilities of our civilization are going to increment, but the need for water remains, arguably increases. Droughts will happen regardless, potentially extended droughts of up to 200 years. The current situation IMO highlights the need to think big going forward on this issue. This problem won't disappear by virtue of a 3 year period of substantial rainfall, which is what people are praying for. They're going to have to plan something going forward.
 
Last edited:

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,844
8,309
136
Last edited:

mundane

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2002
5,603
8
81
I don't know where they get those figures, but in the heat of summer (when I water my vegetables) I've never been into triple figures in my gallons/day. Maybe they are figuring water consumption of a county as a whole divided by its population. Industry/government would use a big chunk.

Rancho Santa Fe, 600 gallons per person per day. Calculated by 'water used in homes' / 'number of residents', so omits industrial, commercial, agricultural.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
It's funny, isn't the overwhelming majority of bottled water in this country coming from California and shipped out across the country?
 

T9D

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
5,320
6
0
3/4 of Oregon is dry high desert by the way.

The rest that get's lots of rain, they are also always fighting for water rights too. And there are still some limits on how much water farmers can use. Sure there is a lot of rain but that rain made rivers and streams that needs to support the ecosystems for. If you suck it dry or lower it significantly then you destroy that. The salmon and fish population in Oregon is always a concern too.

We already send fliipen California our Wind Power from all the windmills farms out here. California needs to get their own crap together. That state is a pile of crap mess, don't shovel it off on everyone else.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,844
8,309
136
3/4 of Oregon is dry high desert by the way.

The rest that get's lots of rain, they are also always fighting for water rights too. And there are still some limits on how much water farmers can use. Sure there is a lot of rain but that rain made rivers and streams that needs to support the ecosystems for. If you suck it dry or lower it significantly then you destroy that. The salmon and fish population in Oregon is always a concern too.

We already send fliipen California our Wind Power from all the windmills farms out here. California needs to get their own crap together. That state is a pile of crap mess, don't shovel it off on everyone else.
LOL. OK, here you go. Obviously, raiding OR for its water won't be easy, OK, probably impossible, they don't have enough even now.

I'm thinking way out in the future, not some 5 year plan to fix things.

Poking around this morning I found a book that I already put on hold at the library and I'm likely to buy:

Water 4.0: The Past, Present, and Future of the World's Most Vital Resource, by David Sedlak
 

FleshLight

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2004
6,883
0
71
Building a pipeline from Oregon or something to the SF Bay Delta would cost at least 50 billion dollars. Desal would cost at least 2 billion for each major city.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |