AstroManLuca
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2004
- 15,628
- 5
- 81
Dude, texashiker, at least MeowKat has the excuse that he's a troll.
Dude, texashiker, at least MeowKat has the excuse that he's a troll.
I weep for the future of humanity, the level of stupidity displayed in this thread is astounding. Even more so when you factor in that this is a tech board and presumably frequented by people who have a little better understanding of science and technology than the average person.
Tex is just really, really, really stupid.
You're giving him too much credit, Fausto.
As for this thread, the OP reads just like his "Sandy hype is overblown" thread......just another thread of pure ignorance from someone who appears to be a child.
I never created any such thread. Your hyperbole is amazing, astounding and absurd. I gave Sandy all due caution and diligence required.
If you want to be critical at least be accurate.
Potential ownage of the year candidate incoming?
There is a fundamental difference between the genetic make up of the flu and the other viruses you listed. The flu is an RNA virus which is prone to mutation and so changes from year to year. Smallpox and some types of Hep are DNA based making them more stable with a much lower rate of genetic change from generation to generation.
The stability of these DNA based viruses helps in creating vaccines. They are effective but only until the virus changes enough to over come it. In the case of Smallpox, we were able to vaccinate a majority of the world fast enough before the virus was able to mutate enough to render it ineffective. This is how it was wiped out.
Again, science isn't your strong point.
Are you going to tell me viruses like polio, HepA, HepB, noro and small pox can not adapt like what TB and gonorrhea can?
If we can wipe small pox out, why cant we wipe the flu out.
Well, there is one reason not to wipe flu out, and that reason is profits.
Could we imagine the horror if we had a "real" flu vaccine that lasted 10, 15 20 years?
The reduced effectiveness of the whooping cough vaccine shows there is a line between profits and effectiveness the drug companies wish to maintain.
Then there are the occasional mumps outbreaks, which have occurred in fully vaccinated students. The result of the outbreak, the government called for booster shots.
What was the result of the California pertussis outbreak? The government is considering booster shots. But then again, why not revert to a stronger vaccine?
Like I said before, its a good thing we had people who put public health over profits working on the small pox and polio vaccine.
It's hard to get the flu when you never leave your mom's basement.
Tex is just really, really, really stupid.
The original shot killed some people. The best vaccines are those with the best effectiveness and the least side effects. New shot with boosters is effective and doesn't kill people.
I'm fine with questioning.If questioning the status quo is stupid, then so be it.
6 of one, half dozen of the other.
The oral polio vaccine was given for decades, which in some cases gave people polio.
It was not until the late 1990s that the US government finally abandoned to oral vaccine. But the oral vaccine is still given throughout the developing world.
I'm fine with questioning.
It's questioning, getting your ass absolutely handed to you over and over, and coming back for more that classifies you as "really, really, really stupid".
All I see is people repeating what they have been told: RNA viruses mutate faster, so there will never be a universal, or long lasting vaccine.
I call BS on that. Not on the mutation part, but on the "its out of our reach" part.
With so many advances behind humanity, why cant we find a cure for the common virus? Not just a vaccine, but a cure.
All I see is people repeating what they have been told: RNA viruses mutate faster, so there will never be a universal, or long lasting vaccine.
I call BS on that. Not on the mutation part, but on the "its out of our reach" part.
With so many advances behind humanity, why cant we find a cure for the common virus? Not just a vaccine, but a cure.
It's simply beyond our reach at the present, no matter how much money we throw at it.
This is why you fix the printers at work and other (read: smart) people work in the field of immunology.
This is why you fix the printers at work and other (read: smart) people work in the field of immunology.
No, you're not. If you were pro-knowledge you'd have learned something from the innumerable times people here have ripped apart your theories on vaccines. You are, as has been pointed out, willfully ignorant.This goes back to the greed issue, how much money is enough? As wall street has proven time and time again, there will never be enough money.
I am not anti-vaccine, but I am pro-knowledge.
You are, as has been pointed out, willfully ignorant.
All I see is people repeating what they have been told: RNA viruses mutate faster, so there will never be a universal, or long lasting vaccine.
I call BS on that. Not on the mutation part, but on the "its out of our reach" part.
With so many advances behind humanity, why cant we find a cure for the common virus? Not just a vaccine, but a cure.
All I see is people repeating what they have been told: RNA viruses mutate faster, so there will never be a universal, or long lasting vaccine.
With so many advances behind humanity, why cant we find a cure for the common virus? Not just a vaccine, but a cure.
So, because we don't have these things yet, you see profit-minded conspiracies?
Seriously?
If it's so easy, and it matters so much to you, why don't you get a degree in the field, do the research, and invent the cure yourself? A true cure for common viral infections will make you a millionaire many times over.