Does Flu Vaccine contain Mercury?
Do a search for flu vaccine and mercury?
According to the CDC, vaccines labeled thimerosal-free often have a little asterisk next to those words which lead you to something like: This vaccine has trace amounts of thimerosal, which the FDA says is equivalent to thimerosal-free products. If we look closer into thimerosal-free vaccines, we will actually find that there is still a toxic amount of mercury contained in them.
There are two kinds of flu shots given. One contains 25 mcg of mercury (in the form of thimerosal with is 50% mercury. There is 50mcg of thimerosal in this flu shot) and is often given as the regular flu shot to those with no special circumstances. The other kind of flu shot is labeled thimerasol-free (containing less than 3mcg of mercury) and is given to young children and pregnant women.
If we look at safe and un-safe levels of mercury, per the FDA, we find this:
2 ppb is the maximum amount of mercury that deems water safe for drinking
Anything over 200 ppb mercury is considered TOXIC [source - EPA]
After doing some math [you can check my math in the article: Vaccine Ingredients A Comprehensive Guide], we find this:
There is up to 300 ppb mercury is in the thimerosal-free flu vaccine.
There is 25,000 ppb mercury given in the flu shot containing 25 mcg of thimerosal as a preservative.
No matter how you cut it, flu vaccines contain toxic amounts of mercury. So yes, the flu vaccines still DOES contain thimerosal. The claim that there is no thimerasol in the flu vaccine is a complete fallacy.
Personally, I would rather take my chances with the flu than be exposed to chemicals, such as mercury.
It's like people are sticking their fingers in their ears (or eyes in this case).
Different forms of chemicals are toxic and others can be nearly inert. Mercury vapor is very toxic and bioaccumulates while ethylmercury (the metabolitic bioproduct from thiomerosal) has far lower toxicity and its half life in the body is fairly short.
Your ppb argument is also nonsense. ppb is concentration, not total amount. You need to look at the total amount of bioaccumulateable mercury in drinking water and in a flu shot. If your drinking water was 2 ppb mercury and you drink 1L per day, you're already consuming 2 ug of mercury(and usually in a toxic form when it is found in drinking water) per day. Are you getting the flu shot daily and does yours come in the super-mega dose size of 500 ml?
To add to this:
Let's, for the moment, assume any version of mercury is the same as every other version of mercury.
You drink 2L of water daily (a little more than half a gallon, which is the typical amount most humans should consume daily). Let's go with the idea that there may be 2ppb of mercury in that. A liter of water is roughly 1kg. 2ppb, when measured against a kilogram of water, is going to mean 2µg Hg. (2 micrograms of Mercury, just to be clear).
Thus, every day, if at that concentration, you will consume roughly 4µg. Every. Day.
Maybe you get water that only has 1ppb Hg, so you get roughly 2µg Hg daily. Maybe some days you get that tasty water that is truly Hg-free. Well lucky you. But many times in your life, you will drink mercury.
In that there vaccine, if it truly contains 25µg Hg, would be the equivalent of taking in 2L of water with 12.5ppb. Maybe you only had to drink 1L with that concentration that day - that's a shocking 25ppb.
Notice how that's still well below the 200ppb threshold you even quoted?
And you only get that at one particular moment on one day (maybe annually).
So, it's not like you are even consuming 25ppb daily, let alone an astronomical 200ppb.
And as stated, that 25µg of mercury is actually ethylmercury, which does not accumulate in the body. Thiomersal breaks down quickly into the organomercury and other compounds (the others not bearing mercury at all, obviously).
Outside of the influenza vaccine for adults, it's exceptionally rare to find it in use for any vaccines as a preservative. In most developed countries, no childhood vaccines contain it.
Yet, for the fans of the anti-vaccine, OMG IT CAUSES AUTISM movement, this fact has no effect on their vocal objections. Autism diagnoses still trend upward, yet children aren't being exposed to any version of mercury in their routine vaccinations.
It couldn't be that our doctors are simply better at diagnosis autism, that more diseases are actually grouped into the autism-spectrum disorder family, and that they are more accurate with their diagnostics. No, not that at all - them lying politicians and vaccine manufacturers are simply finding ways to slip in more mercury into our children, even when they tell us they stopped using mercury completely!
Oh, and never mind the fact that even then, no study has ever linked autism to any version of mercury ever used, in the concentrations ever used.