Coming from you, with the hugely overpriced Titan SLI, I don't think whatever AMD manage to release next at whatever price you would even consider to switch..
And this is why NV can charge whatever they want for a low volume product, because there's enough loyal customers who have no care of the concept of value (perf/$).
@SirPauly, please don't blame AMD for NV raping customers, it doesn't bode well when you clearly know AMD has been offering great value for a long part of 28nm, even moreso with all the bundles.
Out of all you NV loyalists, the only one who voted with their wallet was Balla, with his 7950s. The rest of you are happy to pay overpriced products and are even trying to defend being raped. Welldone to NV's marketing team.
you really think the 780 will be just 3% slower than the titan??? it will be pretty close but not that close.http://videocardz.com/41916/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-780-3dmark-performance-unveiled
Lol ? Oced 780 = Titan ? :/
http://videocardz.com/41916/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-780-3dmark-performance-unveiled
Lol ? Oced 780 = Titan ? :/
3dmark doesn't represent actual gameplay performance but for the record that is a stock 780 .Didn't the boost clock of 780 was by default 906 Mhz?
So now instead of addressing AMD's failure to generate any meaningful revenue, you're bashing Titan and Titan owners? And yeah, I'm very happy with two of the fastest GPU on the planet, too bad AMD can't make a single GPU like it to match it and charge as much. If they could I bet you'd be singing a different tune then along with a lot of the AMD fanboys on this forum.
http://videocardz.com/41916/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-780-3dmark-performance-unveiled
Lol ? Oced 780 = Titan ? :/
3dmark doesn't represent actual gameplay performance but for the record that is a stock 780 .Didn't the boost clock of 780 was by default 906 Mhz?
Could be one of those super boost review cards like the 680's that runs 1200MHz+. :whiste:
Possible but that means it is running at ~30% oc (if the official ~ 900 Mhz boost is true).It may show 780 in good light regarding performance but the noise profile won't be too good.
I didn't literally mean 1200MHz+ for the 780. That was a bit tongue in cheek. That was what the 680's went to, but the bigger chip won't clock as high, and stay inside the TDP limits, I'm pretty certain. The point though is with nVidia boost we can't be certain of what the card was boosting to unless they report it with the review. Sorry for leaving off the sarcasm tag.
In 6 months time 20nm GPU's In CF/SLI will own that Titan SLI for half the price.
AMD doesnt need to make a $1000 GPU to beat titan. It just needs to wait for 20nm and then an overclocked 8950 for $400 will have Titan performance.
Im pretty sure that even the Titans themselves had longer than 6 months reign before the Gods kicked their ass.
As much as a great GPU Titan is, its timing sucks balls. It launches 7 months before 20nm and at $1000. You paid early adopters money for late arrival tech.
Oh and even if AMD did make a $1k GPU id say the same to them.
Poor Titan owners. If they just waited couple of months they could have saved a lot of money.