The GTX 780, 770, 760 ti Thread *First review leaked $700+?*

Page 58 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

UaVaj

Golden Member
Nov 16, 2012
1,546
0
76
I'm calling it now. AMD releases crossfire fix drivers officially to spoil this launch.

prototype2 driver (up to 2560x1600) is slated for the next few month unconfirmed.

prototype3 driver (eyefinity) is who knows when if will ever concieve.
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,649
61
101
Some of the posts in this thread are face palm worthy.

~1.5 years ago AMD release HD7970 with ~20-25% higher performance and lower price than the top end Nvidia single GPU GTX580 3GB. They claim AMD are fleecing us poor consumers.

Almost 3 months later Nvidia release GTX680 and it is slightly cheaper and slightly faster and it somehow seen as handing AMD its ass on a plate. The fact that it only reigned as top dog card for a few short months is conveniently forgotten.

1-1.5 years after HD 7970 is released and Nvidia release the Titan with ~30% higher performance and ~100% price increase and GTX780 with ~20% higher performance and ~60% price increase. Oooh Nvidia are simply the best and AMD should just give up because they can't compete.

Lets just forget that for the vast majority of the past 18 months AMD had the fastest single GPU available and were competing very well in both price and performance.

At least most people aren't trying to defend the pricing of GTX780. But proclaiming AMD as uncompetitive all of a sudden is pure BS. In fact for the first time in a few GPU generations AMD has been far more competetive than they would normally be.

Exactly. Nvidia took a year and a half to bring their "true high end", massively increased the price, managed to solidly beat AMD in the 18 month process, and these knuckleheads are drinking the Kool aid by the oil tanker full. It's strange.
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
Exactly. Nvidia took a year and a half to bring their "true high end", massively increased the price, managed to solidly beat AMD in the 18 month process, and these knuckleheads are drinking the Kool aid by the oil tanker full. It's strange.
well to be fair did they need their true high end? the little gk104 came out and matched or beat the only thing AMD could even come up with. AMD could only lower prices, add game bundles and then also raise their clocks to have a ghz edition to beat gk104 overall.

but yeah that does not change the fact that Titan conditioned everyone to where now a $600-$700 gtx780 seems like a good deal. it is sad that gpu with with 576 shaders disabled can be considered a series flagship card and warrant that price tag.
 
Last edited:

omeds

Senior member
Dec 14, 2011
646
13
81
Exactly. Nvidia took a year and a half to bring their "true high end", massively increased the price, managed to solidly beat AMD in the 18 month process, and these knuckleheads are drinking the Kool aid by the oil tanker full. It's strange.

What are you talking about? Don't you understand Tahiti is AMD's GK110, and Nvidia beat it in every metric with their mid range GK104. AMD have to undercut, oc, and provide game bundles to compete with little GK104.
Then, due to lack of competition Nvidia hyped the GK110 into a "super chip" and sell it for $1k a pop. It's a freaking joke, on Nvidias behalf for raping consumers, and on AMD's behalf for having sub par chips.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Gee, AMD should come out with a card to drive down nVidia's prices so people who buy nVidia can have cheaper prices. Yeah, that makes sense.

I can't believe the people in this thread who blame AMD for not keeping nVidia's prices down. The price you pay for an nVidia card is your fault. Quit putting the blame elsewhere for your own actions.
 

ICDP

Senior member
Nov 15, 2012
707
0
0
What are you talking about? Don't you understand Tahiti is AMD's GK110, and Nvidia beat it in every metric with their mid range GK104. AMD have to undercut, oc, and provide game bundles to compete with little GK104.
Then, due to lack of competition Nvidia hyped the GK110 into a "super chip" and sell it for $1k a pop. It's a freaking joke, on Nvidias behalf for raping consumers, and on AMD's behalf for having sub par chips.

Ironically you are falling for the hype you are bemoaning. GK104 did not beat Tahiti in every metric because for most of the past 18 months Tahiti has been the fastest single GPU and has had the best price/perf. GK104 is a great chip but it doesn't beat Tahiti on every metric. It took Nvidia over a year to finally beat it in every metric apart from price.
 

omeds

Senior member
Dec 14, 2011
646
13
81
Ironically you are falling for the hype you are bemoaning. GK104 did not beat Tahiti in every metric because for most of the past 18 months Tahiti has been the fastest single GPU and has had the best price/perf. GK104 is a great chip but it doesn't beat Tahiti on every metric. It took Nvidia over a year to finally beat it in every metric apart from price.

It beat it in every metric at release. Since then AMD has had to undercut, oc, and offer elaborate game bundles to compete with mid range GK104.
 

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
Ironically you are falling for the hype you are bemoaning. GK104 did not beat Tahiti in every metric because for most of the past 18 months Tahiti has been the fastest single GPU and has had the best price/perf. GK104 is a great chip but it doesn't beat Tahiti on every metric. It took Nvidia over a year to finally beat it in every metric apart from price.

Actually AMD needed another sku to take back the sgpu crown.680 is probably a little bit faster than the original 7970.
 

ICDP

Senior member
Nov 15, 2012
707
0
0
Actually AMD needed another sku to take back the sgpu crown.680 is probably a little bit faster than the original 7970.

Irrelevant, AMD still had the fastest single GPU card for most of the past 18 months. It isn't about how they did it, just the fact that for the past 18 months and contrary to what some people believe, AMD GPUs have been far more than competetive with Nvidia's offerings.

When is that last time Nvidia did not have the single fastest GPU crown for almost a year? Now they are releasing a card that is ~20% faster than a one year old HD7970 and charging a ~60% premium for the privelage. On top of that they are rebranding their GTX6x0 to GTX7x0 with a small OC and charging the same or only slightly lower price price.

Recently I have been very vocal about how AMD have been taking the piss with their pricing of 7790 and 7990. So it isn't like AMD are the good guys, but lets not delude ourselves into thinking HD7xx0 cards were not competetive over the past 18 months.

Somehow Nvidia get a bye ball for vastly inflating prices (lets blame AMD) and hailed for releasing their true high end GPU over one year late. Bravo Nvidia, how could we ever have doubted you.
 
Last edited:

omeds

Senior member
Dec 14, 2011
646
13
81
AMD GPUs have been more than competetive with Nvidia's offerings.

No one is debating that. What you seem to forget though is Nvidias offering was mid range GK104, and allowed them to charge high end prices for it instead of competing with Pitcairn pricing. This has had the follow on effect of GK110 being sold for ridiculous amounts because of its relative performance to GK104 and Tahiti.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |