LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
As for our purpose I personally believe that it was to remove Saddam from power as he was a threat to the surrounding nations. The man had to be removed. However, in addition to that I have to acknowledge that there were definitely some economic ties to Iraq (Oil).
You mean our close allies Syria and Iran?
Just because they aren't our allies doesn't mean that he wasn't a threat to them. We recognize both Syria and Iran as countries. Just because we disagree with most everything does not mean that we want a foreign dictator, who has already proven to be horrible, to invade them or attack them.
Irregardless, Saddam needed to be removed for many other reasons.
-Kevin
To the Contrary... Saddam was a force in the area that all sides needed to consider before making moves... HE was OUR boy in the area for as many years as I can remember.. Removing him... can't be Kuwait... can't be 9/11... can't be to buddy up with Iran, Syria or anyone... It sure can't be human rights issues given we supplied all manner of WMD to him to off all manner of humans..... I wonder ... could it be just plain old oil??? What is left?