I'm looking into getting the benchmarks I need for testing the J4205. What about version of x264 HD benchmark? Is it 5.0.1 that should be used? Also, what version of GFXBench is most interesting to get results from?
I'm looking into getting the benchmarks I need for testing the J4205. What about version of x264 HD benchmark? Is it 5.0.1 that should be used? Also, what version of GFXBench is most interesting to get results from?
Okay, I'll get version 4 then.For GFXBench try the latest version.
5.0.1 is the most recent version I could find (and it's from 2012). I'll use this version unless I get any other recommendation.Regarding X264, maybe an older one, so we can compare it with Braswell / Beema (5.0 / 5.0.1?).
Intel's first 10-nanometer Atom is called MERCURY LAKE.
I know that these are rough CPU-only results, without using any of the CPU's features or such.$ sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --validate run
total time: 45.6506s
$ sysbench --num-threads=2 --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --validate run
total time: 25.2435s
14.1.1 Goldmont Microarchitecture
The Goldmont microarchitecture builds on the success of the Silvermont microarchitecture (see Section
14.1.2), and provides the following enhancements:
• An out-of-order execution engine with a 3-wide superscalar pipeline. Specifically:
— The decoder can decode 3 instructions per cycle.
— The microcode sequencer can send 3 uops per cycle for allocation into the reservation stations.
— Retirement supports a peak rate of 3 per cycle.
• Enhancement in branch prediction which de-couples the fetch pipeline from the instruction decoder.
• Larger out-of-order execution window and buffers that enable deeper out-of-order execution across
integer, FP/SIMD, and memory instruction types.
• Fully out-of-order memory execution and disambiguation. The Goldmont microarchitecture can
execute one load and one store per cycle (compared to one load or one store per cycle in the
Silvermont microarchitecture). The memory execution pipeline also includes a second level TLB
enhancement with 512 entries for 4KB pages.
• Integer execution cluster in the Goldmont microarchitecture provides three pipelines and can
execute up to three simple integer ALU operations per cycle.
• SIMD integer and floating-point instructions execute in a 128-bit wide engine. Throughput and
latency of many instructions have improved, including PSHUFB with 1-cycle throughput (versus 5
cycles for Silvermont microarchitecture) and many other SIMD instructions with doubled throughput;
see Table 14-14 for details.
• Throughput and latency of instructions for accelerating encryption/description (AES) and carry-less
multiplication (PCLMULQDQ) have been improved significantly in the Goldmont microarchitecture.
• The Goldmont microarchitecture provides new instructions with hardware accelerated secure
hashing algorithm, SHA1 and SHA256.
• The Goldmont microarchitecture also adds support for the RDSEED instruction for random number
generation meeting the NIST SP800-90C standard.
• PAUSE instruction latency is optimized to enable better power efficiency.
I'm also waiting for brix or zotac apollo lake, but it needs to be 4 core and passive.
ASUS might also have something for you based on this fanless Vivo PC with N3700:
https://www.asus.com/Mini-PCs/VivoMini-UN45/specifications/
ASRock too:
http://www.asrock.com/microsite/beebox/
P.S. I found those PCs from the following fanless tech roundup---> http://www.fanlesstech.com/2016/10/fanless-nuc-roundup-2016.html
Wonder why/how the ASRock J4205-ITX doesn't support DDR4, since the Pentium J4205 clearly does. Maybe some other manufacturer will release an ITX board with this latest Pentium architecture CPU and DDR4 support.
Goldmont results inbound!
In the meantime, I've run some benchmarks. I will re-run the benchmarks once (if) I get the 1866 MHz memory working. Also, I don't have any graphics benchmarks yet, except for Cinebench. I got really low results in Fire Strike, but I also just realized that I don't have the very latest driver installed. I'll try to remedy that tonight.
I haven't tried to compare much to Bay Trail and Cherry Trail yet, but I think it looks like it's a decent step up performance-wise.
There's an Intel GPU driver installed and I just ran the test, without changing any settings, so it should be for the iGPU.Is that Cinebench OpenGL score for CPU or iGPU?
Sure, I already have it on the system. Just didn't have time to run it last night. The x264 benchmark took forever...If I'm not asking too much, run Cinebench 11.5 as well, much easier to compare to older CPUs.
That's an Android score ;-) Though that doesn't make a lot of difference since the highest Windows 64-bit score is 1207/3405.Geekbench v4
Pentium J4205:
ST: 1643
MT: 4679
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/1038829
(...)
Pentium N3710 (highest score):
ST: 1214
MT: 3457
More J4205 results! I installed the updated Intel driver and it resolved the 3DMark issue.