http://www.notebookinfo.de/artikel/...3770-fuer-windows-8-und-android-tablets/3995/
As for 3d performance here a new result.
Cinebench R11.5 32-Bit OpenGL 5,84 fps
For comparison A4-1200 reaches 7.18 fps: http://tweakers.net/productreview/83223/medion-akoya-e1318t.html
So Z3770 19% slower than A4-1200 but considering that Intel doing worse in OpenGL than in directx it is expected. I don't know if 32 bit OpenGL scores in Cinebench 11.5 are worse than in 64 bit though, something to check.
You said Temash is 2xGPU which was clearly way off. People who said that z3770 should be roughly comparable to A4-1200 in 3d were pretty accurate.
You have to search for your own postings. 19% is nothing in this class. Z3770 should be much better suited for games than the A4-1200 due to its better CPU which is a big bottleneck usually for such devices, just have a look to A6-1450.
Until we see some actual games benchmarks in a direct comparison is useless to argue about, i think it will close to the E-350/Dual Temash, but i expect a Quad Temash to be better.
Still none of them are suited for games, and its probably that both the Temash and the BT will be able to play the same games at similar resolutions/details, with Quad Temash taking a small lead.
Still we know the prices of Temash? the A4-1250 is selling for the same price range we can expect a 2955U, that to me is a big no-no for every Temash out there, i have my dubts about Kabini vs C Haswell, but DUAL Temash VS C Haswell? no chance.
With that in mind, the BT seems to be in a lower sector than Temash too.
The problem with that review it does not seem to be taking intro consideration the $250 Haswell equipped Chromebooks on the way, like Acer C720.
Did they say 128-bit wide LPDDR3-1066???? BT has dual channel?! i trought it was 64 bit only.
also the battery life wont be any better...we are talking celeron level crippled haswell.To be fair, that chromebook has no IPS touchscreen, detachable keyboard, windows, and is likely more cheaply built as well, knowing Acer..
T100 sounds great to me. The only comparable AMD product I can think of is the Acer V5 122P, which is slightly larger, but has a worse CPU. And its more expensive.[/QUOTE]
the cpu isn't far off...
cinebench:
the a6-1450 get 0.25-1 [single-multi]
while
the z3740 get 0.31-1.24 [single-multi], so it is hardly a world beater
and the gpu the amd part has that lock...
baytrail's battery life is much better though, also the acer has a better display and costs $50 more...
Did they say 128-bit wide LPDDR3-1066???? BT has dual channel?! i trought it was 64 bit only.
The memory interface is fairly ridiculous by mobile standards. You either get two 64-bit LPDDR3 channels (128-bit total width) or a single 64-bit DDR3L channel. In the case of the former, thats the same memory bus width as Apples A5X/A6X line of SoCs as well as the standard Core i3/i5/i7 parts. Max supported memory frequency is 1066MHz in dual-channel LPDDR3 mode, or 1333MHz in single-channel DDR3L mode. The only benefit to the latter is really cost, as Bay Trail will purportedly show up in some very cheap devices.
the cpu isn't far off...
cinebench:
the a6-1450 get 0.25-1 [single-multi]
while
the z3740 get 0.31-1.24 [single-multi], so it is hardly a world beater
and the gpu the amd part has that lock...
baytrail's battery life is much better though, also the acer has a better display and costs $50 more...
that is a very good question...also the a6-5200 would do great in such a formfactor if hungrier i3/5s can...I just cant figure out why it is impossible to buy an A4-5000 in a 11.6 inch chassis. I worry that the A6-1450 will be slow enough to be irritating.
On the review is the 3dmark Physics and Graphics scores correct? it looks switched.
that is a very good question...also the a6-5200 would do great in such a formfactor if hungrier i3/5s can...
that aside, i am looking forward to anand's power testing...
I dont think its only based on power(it has been compared to a ULV haswell already?), the bad thing about the A6-5200 is that is the top of the line and while can give a fight to a I3 on CPU side thats petty much all about it, OEM can use the exact same design to offer the same product from a 2955U (that somehow is around a A4-1250 products prices, Dell Inspiron 11 3000 for example ) to any other Core IX-XXXXU incluiding the 28W ones with GT3, that cheap way of offer diferent configurations(you just solder a diferent processor) is not something you can get with a Kabini, where the options will be from a A4-1250 to a A6-5200...
14 and 15.6" are more standart and easier to work with, its not the first time OEM use cheap procesors to offer cheap models, it has been done with Bobcat and Atoms...
We gona have the exact same problem with BT... You gona see it a lot on convertibles, but 11.6" OEM seem to be going for Haswells.
btw, the Dell Inspiron 11 3000 has been said to have a AMD version, but so far only the Intel has show up.
I dont think its only based on power(it has been compared to a ULV haswell already?), the bad thing about the A6-5200 is that is the top of the line and while can give a fight to a I3 on CPU side thats petty much all about it, OEM can use the exact same design to offer the same product from a 2955U (that somehow is around a A4-1250 products prices, Dell Inspiron 11 3000 for example ) to any other Core IX-XXXXU incluiding the 28W ones with GT3, that cheap way of offer diferent configurations(you just solder a diferent processor) is not something you can get with a Kabini, where the options will be from a A4-1250 to a A6-5200...
14 and 15.6" are more standart and easier to work with, its not the first time OEM use cheap procesors to offer cheap models, it has been done with Bobcat and Atoms...
We gona have the exact same problem with BT... You gona see it a lot on convertibles, but 11.6" OEM seem to be going for Haswells.