The Intel Atom Thread

Page 119 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
its funny I can't get bioshock to run

I'll be trying to get it installed when I get home. Got the discs but may just get a copy from some friends online instead of messing with transferring the discs somehow.

I'll let you know how it goes, the video looks impressive and I've got the z3775 so hopefully that gives me a nice bump in performance.
 

liahos1

Senior member
Aug 28, 2013
573
45
91
maybe its a sloppy port of bioshock? fps and texture resolution on that look like its running on a ps2
 

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
maybe its a sloppy port of bioshock? fps and texture resolution on that look like its running on a ps2

That seems to be a common problem. Just like the HL2/Portal ports to Tegra it just goes to show that x86 might get a huge boost in performance simply from being so familiar and common to game devs. With TK1 and hopefully more standards-compliant designs coming out that might change- but for now the T100 is hands down the best gaming tablet/convertible in my opinion.

Just got home and downloading bioshock- should have something posted on my results tonight or early tomorrow.
 

Roland00Address

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2008
2,196
260
126
That seems to be a common problem. Just like the HL2/Portal ports to Tegra it just goes to show that x86 might get a huge boost in performance simply from being so familiar and common to game devs. With TK1 and hopefully more standards-compliant designs coming out that might change- but for now the T100 is hands down the best gaming tablet/convertible in my opinion.

Just got home and downloading bioshock- should have something posted on my results tonight or early tomorrow.

Not a great screen though. Sure it is not a bad screen, but still not a great one. It is definitely a screen you expect on a $300 tablet, and not a $400 to $500 one.

Yeah yeah, eventually they will get it right, but I want my ferrari right now and i want it to cost only 1 dollar, maybe 2.
 

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
That seems to be a common problem. Just like the HL2/Portal ports to Tegra it just goes to show that x86 might get a huge boost in performance simply from being so familiar and common to game devs. With TK1 and hopefully more standards-compliant designs coming out that might change- but for now the T100 is hands down the best gaming tablet/convertible in my opinion.

Just got home and downloading bioshock- should have something posted on my results tonight or early tomorrow.

surface pro is pretty beefy.
 

ams23

Senior member
Feb 18, 2013
907
0
0
Sweepr said:
Playing these games on its native platform must have some advantages because both Tegra 4 and especially Apple A7 outperform Bay Trail-T in pure graphics benchmarks. What do you guys think?

I don't think that's it. Bioshock for iOS does need to run on two year old OpenGL ES2 hardware in a smartphone form factor, so there is only so much that they can do here. Tegra 4 is also limited with it's OpenGL ES2 hardware.
 
Last edited:

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
I don't think that's it. Bioshock for iOS does need to run on two year old OpenGL ES2 hardware in a smartphone form factor, so there is only so much that they can do here. Tegra 4 is also limited with it's OpenGL ES2 hardware.

idevices with A7 should have GLES3 and metal apis...
 

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,143
136
Bioshock for iOS is meant to run on A6, A6X, A7 and future SoC's. A6 and A6X have OpenGL ES2 GPU's.

Couldn't it run @ OpenGL ES 3.0 on A7-based devices anyway? Games usually run on higher quality settings/resolutions on newer iOS phones/tablets. I think scaling back game assets may be related to App Store's app size limit.
 

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
surface pro is pretty beefy.

Fair enough, I should have added the caveat "Within the consumer tablet price range"

Surface is ungodly cool no doubt, but I have two huge problems with it- the price, and the keyboard. If only they would release one that docks like most the other tablet convertibles I would be all there. As it is I can see myself getting over the price, if only it had a real keyboard dock.

Also, got caught up in work and haven't been able to install bioshock- but expect a report soon.
 

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
Yea, that is my problem with the surface as well. For the price, they really should include the keyboard.

I should have been more clear, I don't mean the keyboard not being included. I mean the lack of a keyboard that can turn it into a pseudo laptop like the transformer series. I want to be able to dock the surface and have something that is 99% like an ultrabook. None of this magnet/wiggly super-thin, no-travel crappy keyboard stuff.

I've tried every surface keyboard since the original and just can't see how people do it. I want to like/buy one so bad- but that is a must have for me.

Edit to respond to roland:

Not a great screen though. Sure it is not a bad screen, but still not a great one. It is definitely a screen you expect on a $300 tablet, and not a $400 to $500 one.

Yeah yeah, eventually they will get it right, but I want my ferrari right now and i want it to cost only 1 dollar, maybe 2.

I know you acknowledge in the second half that your first half is nitpicky but I wanted to weigh in anyways. I think the screen is good, and my only complaint is its brightness being a bit too low in well-lit/outside settings. Just to put my judging in perspective I have an Asus ROG $1000 laptop with the same res and what appears to be worse quality I bought last year.

I think for how cheap it is, especially including the keyboard dock, they did a good job balancing the cheapness of all the components. The only thing I would gladly pay more to have is a keyboard dock with a battery built-in. I loved that so much on the original android transformer. Nothing like 17 hours unplugged.
 
Last edited:

bullzz

Senior member
Jul 12, 2013
405
23
81
@monstercameron - wow that is a cheap little tablet. hopefully i am looking at the right price. translation is messed up
 

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
I have to love google translate "it does its thing but good" !!

Anyway, I am not clear on what Merrifield is. Is the modem integrated or still separate? Is it Bay Trail? Looks interesting, but not sure the point of atom for android.

its a dual core silvermonts cores with powervr cores, i dont think these socs have the modem on-die.
these probably have the corrected contra-revenue bom costs.
 

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,143
136

Impressive results considering it powers a $160 tablet. 85-90% of A7's graphics performance running a 1280x800 screen yields 33.3 FPS @ GFXBench T-Rex onscreen benchmark, that's faster than 1080p Adreno 330 devices and 2x faster than Nexus 7 (2013) @ native resolution (16.3 FPS). Nice cheap Android gaming tablet.

More Fanless Bay-Trail: ASRock Releases Two Pentium J2900 Motherboards

When we looked at AMD’s Kabini platform, AMD in its press materials pitted their high end APU against the Pentium J2900 in terms of price and performance. The only issue from the reviewer’s standpoint was the availability of the Pentium J2900 in a retail product. At the time, the J2900 was found only in OEM devices, or a single system was found through Google Shopping. Fast forward a few months and we are now seeing a small wave of J2900 motherboards coming to market for custom home builds. ASRock look poised to release the Q2900-ITX and Q2900M to meet that demand. [...]





http://anandtech.com/show/8344/baytrail-asrock-releases-pentium-j2900-motherboards
http://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/showthread.php?t=44452

Lenovo Miix 3 tablet on the way?



An unannounced tablet called the Lenovo Miix 3-830 showed up at the Postel website recently. That’s the Indonesian equivalent of the FCC, and it’s the same place we recently saw the first mention of a Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro tablet.

There aren’t many details about the tablet at the moment, but the name and model number suggest it’ll be a next-gen 8 inch tablet with Windows software.

The Lenovo Miix 2 tablet was a low-cost model with an 8 inch, 1280 x 800 pixel display, 2GB of RAM, at least 32GB of storage, and an Intel Atom Z3740 processor. While Lenovo no longer sells the tablet through its own store a number of retailers are still selling the tablet for $200 or less.

It’s not clear if the new model will feature improvements such as a higher-resolution display or a different processor. Lenovo could also take a different approach by offering an entry-level device with a lower price tag and less impressive specs.

http://liliputing.com/2014/08/lenovo-miix-3-tablet-way.html
http://notebookitalia.it/lenovo-miix-3-8-miix-3-830-20139

6 Windows 8.1 tablets for $199 or less



Starting prices for Windows tablets continue to fall. Toshiba recently launched one of the first tablets with a list price of $199 and a $99 model is on the way from Chinese device maker Kingsing.

But you can get an even better deal if you pick up a slightly older tablet that’s been discounted in the months since it first hit the streets. That’s because instead of buying a device that was designed to sell for under $199 you can get a model with a faster CPU and more memory and storage for about the same price.

Prices will likely continue to fall in the coming months… but here are 6 Windows 8.1 tablets you can buy today for half the price of an iPad mini with Retina Display. [...]

1. Toshiba Encore 2 – $192 (Amazon)

2. FNF Fine8 Work Tablet – $165 (PandaWill)

3. Cube iWork8 – $185 (Newegg)

4. Asus VivoTab Note 8 – $199 (Amazon)

5. Lenovo IdeaTab Miix 2 – $200 (Amazon)

6. Toshiba Encore WT8 – $195 (Amazon)

http://liliputing.com/2014/08/6-windows-8-1-tablet-for-199-or-less.html
 

Roland00Address

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2008
2,196
260
126
TrulyUncouth said:
I know you acknowledge in the second half that your first half is nitpicky but I wanted to weigh in anyways. I think the screen is good, and my only complaint is its brightness being a bit too low in well-lit/outside settings. Just to put my judging in perspective I have an Asus ROG $1000 laptop with the same res and what appears to be worse quality I bought last year.

I think for how cheap it is, especially including the keyboard dock, they did a good job balancing the cheapness of all the components. The only thing I would gladly pay more to have is a keyboard dock with a battery built-in. I loved that so much on the original android transformer. Nothing like 17 hours unplugged.


The screen is great for a laptop or netbook since these devices usually have shitty screens. Its screen is probably better than 90% of laptop screens out there. It is about so so for a $300 dollar tablet. Not saying it has a bad tablet screens but its screen is similar to others in this price point. And it pales in comparison to an iPad retina or nexus 7 screen (I am spoiled by my nexus)

If you want to make a tablet a great portable gaming device you need to be able to use it outdoors which means 500 nits + brightness and/or very low reflections.

I am not saying the t100 is shit with the screen I was raving about the screen when I got my t100 last year ( links earlier thread)
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2354603
 

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
The screen is great for a laptop or netbook since these devices usually have shitty screens. Its screen is probably better than 90% of laptop screens out there. It is about so so for a $300 dollar tablet. Not saying it has a bad tablet screens but its screen is similar to others in this price point. And it pales in comparison to an iPad retina or nexus 7 screen (I am spoiled by my nexus)

If you want to make a tablet a great portable gaming device you need to be able to use it outdoors which means 500 nits + brightness and/or very low reflections.

I am not saying the t100 is shit with the screen I was raving about the screen when I got my t100 last year ( links earlier thread)
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2354603

I may have come off too defensive in that, just trying to give my comparisons of it. I almost bought the nexus 7 2013 just because the reviews for the screen were so amazing. And oddly I remember the screens on the old android transformers to be of great quality.

Just conjecture but, other than savings, its probably hard to find a high quality screen in 1366x768 and the general opinion is win8 doesn't cope well with high res. Perhaps Asus figured "2 birds" its smarter to just save some money and complaints on dpi scaling and go for a 768p. Too bad, I would've loved 400+ nits to get some back-deck gaming in. Maybe time for a premium model with higher brightness? Atleast the light-bleed is a million times better compared to my original transformer.
 

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
Bioshock for iOS is meant to run on A6, A6X, A7 and future SoC's. A6 and A6X have OpenGL ES2 GPU's.

I guess the question is why they didn't simply make a separate code path, considering the game looks dreadful.

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/04/bioshock-ios/

That top image draws smaller on my screen than it would on an ipad and it looks really bad. Considering that was given out as a press shot I can only imagine some of the game looks even worse- like the video earlier in thread.

I wish they would've just manned up and made it A7 or higher only. I mean A7 is a year old at this point and the game isn't even released yet.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Baytrail laptop at Microcenter for 199.00 link

Normally not a fan of putting these low power SOCs in full size laptops, but that price is really amazingly low. Most of the reviews were good as well, except for a few that cited lack of dvd drive or ethernet port.
 

Roland00Address

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2008
2,196
260
126
Just conjecture but, other than savings, its probably hard to find a high quality screen in 1366x768 and the general opinion is win8 doesn't cope well with high res. Perhaps Asus figured "2 birds" its smarter to just save some money and complaints on dpi scaling and go for a 768p. Too bad, I would've loved 400+ nits to get some back-deck gaming in. Maybe time for a premium model with higher brightness? Atleast the light-bleed is a million times better compared to my original transformer.

You want 16x9 or 16x10 with Windows 8.0 (it is less of an issue with 8.1 for Microsoft allowed more options with snap and tablets). You also wanted at least 1024x768 or 1366x768 or higher under the old windows 8.0 rules (1280x800 could not do snap, but 1366x768 could). Since microsofts rules trying to standarized parts, the only real options for a premade panel was 1366x768, 1920x1080, and 1920x1200.

Higher resolutions do have an occasional problem with windows 8.0. It is slightly improved in windows 8.1 and hopefully massively improved in windows 9 or 8.2

-----

That said I am not really complaining about resolution, 1366x768 is a fine ppi. I am more complaining about brightness and color. Not saying it is bad, I very much understand ASUS making money, as well as hitting a certain price point to be competitive (aka $300 for 32gb and $350 for 64gb. That said I know there are better screens out there, for Google via ASUS and Apple proved this.

Like I said my nexus spoiled me, it showed me that you can have an awesome screen with today's technology. Thus I think ASUS should have a legitimate option in the near future that offers this. Sure it may cost the customer more, but more options are better than less options.

And like I said before, the Screen is the biggest thing limiting this from being a better gaming device. It is light already (more light can make it better), it has a decent case already (of course this can always be improved), you can always make it faster but if you choose what games you put on it, and windows has some awesome games over the last 20 years there are many good games you can play on the t100.

Baytrail laptop at Microcenter for 199.00 link

Normally not a fan of putting these low power SOCs in full size laptops, but that price is really amazingly low. Most of the reviews were good as well, except for a few that cited lack of dvd drive or ethernet port.

Give me FLASH memory or give me death. Would it be a crime to put 64 or 32gb flash memory (a real ssd or emmc?) It would cost roughly the same as 500gb hard drive.
 
Last edited:

TrulyUncouth

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
213
0
76
Warning in advance- My results may have been affected by the fact I was using the tablet in a hot environment and with it recently charged(Mine gets pretty hot when charged for a while). The tablet was quite warm to the touch before I launched the game- not sure how much that affects it, just sharing. I also had fraps running the entire time and some people claim it hurts performance- YMMV.

Ok, got bioshock up and running on the T100. Results are mixed. At low/med settings mixed with high textures at 720p it runs mostly in the mid-20's with too many dips down into the teens for my taste- but looks surprisingly good. Native 1366*768 loses only ~2fps, but at this low of fps to begin with I wouldn't suggest it.

If you must have consistent 25+fps then I found good results with 800x600. At that res it still looked good while being very responsive to input and in my ~5 minutes testing never saw it drop below 25fps. Also, if you are a die-hard fps hound you can hit 40-50s at 480p with 30fps being pretty much the floor on your fps, but I wouldn't suggest it because it looks bad.

I saw some dips in strange places like when approaching the bathysphere at the beginning even though that area is graphically simpler than sweeping vistas that had higher framerates. I did not get a chance to test on the more involved multi-enemy boss fights and whatnot because I can't find my old saves- so I make no promises on how that would change FPS.

The game is playable and doesn't look bad, but be warned it will lag occasionally at 720p and higher. I didn't run into any installation issues but I did use an illicit copy online that was pre-patched to v1.1 since I wasn't about to hassle with trying to get my original CD's installed on the tablet. If you own the game and can't get it working I don't think anyone would morally judge you for fixing it this way, Cameron.

Conclusion- If you are either willing to accept low fps and good visuals or mediocre visuals to get good fps- then bioshock is definitely playable on the T100.

Comparison to ios- I'll leave this up to the professionals for the most part because I don't have a setup to capture video and compare it- but just eyeballing it I think the PC version appears to be using a better lighting path even on lowest settings but I am impressed comparing the two how smoothly the iOS version seems to run.

Edit:

Response to Roland so I don't pollute with too many posts-

I should have been more clear. I am saying perhaps the fact that 10.1 inch 768p screens are rare enough that Asus couldn't find a reasonably priced one that hit higher brightness/better color. I am not knowledgable in this area at all so was just taking a shot in the dark. I know their transformers in the past were known for bright/good screens when compared against contemporaries so I was trying to think of a valid reason why this would be a different case.

Either way, I haven't caught myself thinking the screen was subpar- my biggest complaint is the lack of brightness when I use it outside, which is admittedly not too often.
 
Last edited:
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
Warning in advance- My results may have been affected by the fact I was using the tablet in a hot environment and with it recently charged(Mine gets pretty hot when charged for a while). The tablet was quite warm to the touch before I launched the game- not sure how much that affects it, just sharing. I also had fraps running the entire time and some people claim it hurts performance- YMMV.

Ok, got bioshock up and running on the T100. Results are mixed. At low/med settings mixed with high textures at 720p it runs mostly in the mid-20's with too many dips down into the teens for my taste- but looks surprisingly good. Native 1366*768 loses only ~2fps, but at this low of fps to begin with I wouldn't suggest it.

If you must have consistent 25+fps then I found good results with 800x600. At that res it still looked good while being very responsive to input and in my ~5 minutes testing never saw it drop below 25fps. Also, if you are a die-hard fps hound you can hit 40-50s at 480p with 30fps being pretty much the floor on your fps, but I wouldn't suggest it because it looks bad.

I saw some dips in strange places like when approaching the bathysphere at the beginning even though that area is graphically simpler than sweeping vistas that had higher framerates. I did not get a chance to test on the more involved multi-enemy boss fights and whatnot because I can't find my old saves- so I make no promises on how that would change FPS.

The game is playable and doesn't look bad, but be warned it will lag occasionally at 720p and higher. I didn't run into any installation issues but I did use an illicit copy online that was pre-patched to v1.1 since I wasn't about to hassle with trying to get my original CD's installed on the tablet. If you own the game and can't get it working I don't think anyone would morally judge you for fixing it this way, Cameron.

Conclusion- If you are either willing to accept low fps and good visuals or mediocre visuals to get good fps- then bioshock is definitely playable on the T100.

Comparison to ios- I'll leave this up to the professionals for the most part because I don't have a setup to capture video and compare it- but just eyeballing it I think the PC version appears to be using a better lighting path even on lowest settings but I am impressed comparing the two how smoothly the iOS version seems to run.

The fact that Bay Trail even with its relatively poor graphics can hold up in these titles decently has me excited for what Cherry Trail will bring.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |