This is not true, TDP remains unchanged basically compared to Braswell. If you are trying to compare desktop or mobile SKUs it does not work because they have of course a higher TDP. These are not aimed for Smartphones.
Keep in mind they are only getting that score by upping the TDP beyond what you could reasonably put in a smartphone. Or a tablet really.
Agreed, but considering that Intel could scale it well down... they could reach ARM A72 levels at 14 nm.
I am sincere, Intel did the WORST mistake eliminating Broxton. They had Asus as a major client and they could get some more like Xiaomi or Acer on their group if they continued in that path.
I would bought an Intel based phone if those had 4 A72 level cores. Broxton managed that levels.... with A57 power consumption.
I dissagree this time. Asus was expecting the buying of those chips since it were cheaper than going Qualcomm.Intel probably had no customers for Broxton, which is why they didn't bother.
Well... they could gave the licence of the x86 phones to Rockchip. Borxton was a promising platform... SoFIA was the one who killed Intel.Intel had to shut the door on Broxton to open the door for smartphone foundry business. From a strategic perspective, the foundry business is more attractive if Intel can leverage this business to slow competing fabs advanced process node investments. Channel conflicts are a problem best avoided.
Well... they could gave the licence of the x86 phones to Rockchip. Borxton was a promising platform... SoFIA was the one who killed Intel.
Apollo Lake on sale in Japan!
http://www.1-s.jp/products/detail/154152 (Celeron J3455)
http://www.1-s.jp/products/detail/154151 (Pentium J4205)
I think you can type about:memory in the url and do garbage collecting whenever but YMMV. I just close and reopen tbh.That said, I'm a bit frustrated with my J1900 Brix unit's performance, with Windows 7 64-bit and Waterfox 49.0.2. The new "multiprocess windowing" feature seems to speed things up, when you first start the browser, but if you keep the browser running, as I do, for weeks at a time, it really gets bogged down a lot more than prior non-multi-threaded versions. It also grows to eat in excess of 8GB of memory, over time. Ouch!
If it didn't have the RAM bloat / heap thrashing issue, then it might be more viable.
Chinese device maker Teclast has announced it’s replacing a number of its tablets with new models, including several with Intel Celeron N3450 Apollo Lake processors. There’s also at least one model on the way which has a Core i5 processor, although it’s not clear which i5 chip it will have.
Teclast’s press releases about the new tablets are still pretty vague, but they do suggest that the goal is to refresh its tablet lineup with new, more powerful models...
Great, I can't wait to replace my Bay Trail tablet.Teclast plans to launch tablets with Apollo Lake chips
https://liliputing.com/2016/10/teclast-plans-launch-tablets-apollo-lake-chips.html
Great news. Hope others follow.
Intel says it supports 10 bit HEVC decoding in hardware.
Are these cpus finally faster than core 2 duos yet? atoms have always been garbage as desktops and laptops- barely usable in light workloads.
I wonder why AES is always so low in Atom (108 vs 1175 and 216 vs 3826)
Only took their whole history for this to happen, eh.
No dedicated instruction on Core 2 Duo.I wonder why AES is always so low in Atom (108 vs 1175)
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/compare/859975?baseline=845239
Oh whoops, nice catch... I read that backwards. lolNo dedicated instruction on Core 2 Duo..
Linux 64-bit Comparison:
- Atom T5700 (up to 2.4 GHz)
Geekbench 4 Single-Core: 1800
- Pentium N3700 (up to 2.4 GHz) - Highest Score
Geekbench 4 Single-Core: 1141
Nice IPC bump from Goldmont, even if we consider AES.