The Islamic thread

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: hscorpio
So how long was the period from when Muhammad received his message completely to when it was first written down?

Over 23 years of revelation completed the Quran.

So it was written down 23 years after Muhammad died then?

No, it was revealed over a period of over 23 years. The revelations were to the Prophet (S.A) who dictated them to his companions. These revelations were memorized by the companions. The veracity of the Quran cannot be disputed. The work of a human would contain some errors. The Quran has been free of these. Many anti-Islamic websites will definitely contain many verses to tout contradictions, but they are false.

It also contains many incredibe and miraculous verses. I will attempt to provide that information when someone asks.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wahabism has gotten a bad rap. It is simply following the Qu'ran and Sunnah and Hadith as fully as possibly. I would consider myself to be a wahabi-lite. Sultan sounds like a wahabi to me as well.

Wahabism isn't killing everything that doesn't have a beard and the cloistering of women.

Can you explain why you quote Adolf Hitler in your sig?
 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: hscorpio
So how long was the period from when Muhammad received his message completely to when it was first written down?

Over 23 years of revelation completed the Quran.

So it was written down 23 years after Muhammad died then?

No, it was revealed over a period of over 23 years. The revelations were to the Prophet (S.A) who dictated them to his companions. These revelations were memorized by the companions. The veracity of the Quran cannot be disputed. The work of a human would contain some errors. The Quran has been free of these. Many anti-Islamic websites will definitely contain many verses to tout contradictions, but they are false.

It also contains many incredibe and miraculous verses. I will attempt to provide that information when someone asks.

So when was it first written down and by whom?

Google is giving me conflicting results. Some sites claim Muhammad wrote the Quran wwhile others claim that the hadith(?) teaches that Muhammad was illiterate.

One of the sites I found said at first some groups had differing memorizations of the Quran and some guy ordered an official version be printed to avoid any more confusion. Text

So how can you be so sure that the version this guy ordered printed was the accurate version.

Also what does the (S.A) mean when placed after the word prophet?

 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Google is giving me conflicting results. Some sites claim Muhammad wrote the Quran wwhile others claim that the hadith(?) teaches that Muhammad was illiterate.

One of the sites I found said at first some groups had differing memorizations of the Quran and some guy ordered an official version be printed to avoid any more confusion. Text

So how can you be so sure that the version this guy ordered printed was the accurate version.

Also what does the (S.A) mean when placed after the word prophet?

Here's the most comprehensive answer to your question. Please read Link

Thank you for asking. It helped me learn quite a bit too.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: Aimster
I love how people flock to Sultan's defense. I also love how random people register for the first time and post for the very first time in this thread. One needs to question who those people are, especially the people who just registered. Someone obviously has told them about P&N and I doubt they came on their own. EX: someone posted for the very first time on anandtech.com they they were a hijabi. Where did she come from?

You are missing the facts. Sultan is a Taliban. I never argued about Ramadan, praying, or eating pork. Did I? Show me where I argued with Sultan about those topics in this thread and you can get a cookie too, but for now I'm keeping the cookie.
No, I think the fact is that you believe there are as as many Muslims who follow your interpretation is where I would disagree.
You agree with the killing of his child if he/she commits adultery?
You agree that the Taliban were not bad and were good for the Afghan people?
He is the one who says a women needs to lower their face when they talk to a man, but Sultan fails to mention a man must do the same. Why? Because he has no respect for women at all and ignores that part.
I wouldn't agree with Sultan's comments, but at the same time I am confident enough my kids wouldn't run around and have premarital sex. If they did? Worst decision they'll make because to me it shows a lack of patience, and an inability to control oneself. We could debate that all day llong, but in the end I would be confident that they wouldn't. But if they did, nope I wouldn't chop of their head and kill them because it isn't necessary these days.
I don't agree that the Taliban were good-- they were more idiotic than anything~ I never understood the whole shooting missles at statues that are now historical monuments and I guess neither did all the other clerics as they condemied it.
No I'm sure he lowers his face when he talks to a women. Unless you are extremely chauvanistic I find it hard for people to expect that out of someone and not to the same. This is something that a lot of people do- many people don't look at me when I speak to them (And the majority of people i speak with are not muslim. perhaps out of every 100 people i talk to 3 are muslim) even though I always make it a point to make eye contact.

Stop accusing me or assuming i agree with things. Because I think its riducluos how much you insult him doesn't mean you should associate who i am with hiim.

You can believe Islamic Law. If your kid in the future ever steals some candy and gets caught, remind me to cut off his finger.
No if they stole some candy I'd make them go to the store, return it and say they are sorry and then pay for the candy they stole. In 700 A.D. when having something of your poesseion taken away could mean grave consequences for the survival of you and your familly, it made perfect sense. But now even if I did let me kid steal that candy bar, the trangression that is created is minimal at best-->therefore the consequences shouldn't be as great
Sultan holds the very beliefs the Taliban believe in. How are the Taliban different from Sultan?
Well even though I see him as much more extreme, I doubt he sits there for 15 hours a day reading the Quran becasue that clearly brings no benefit. God only helps those who help themselves, and by sitting down and just praying the marginal cost of praying that much is a 1000x greater than the marginal benefit That and I beleive in the Quran or Hadith it staes that at the extreme, no more than 8 hours a day should be spent on praying. But I think that it is meant in mainly a passive manner. 5 prayers that take anywhere from 3-5 minutes are minute, and i think the rest is things like saying "subhanallah" as you sit down after a while, etc.

Anyone who is a Taliban is an extremist. I'm not insulting anyone. "fanatical wacko" is hardly an insult. If that offends you then like Arnold says, "You're a girly boy". I'm not going to be nice while someone goes off at me saying I damage Islam because I was wrong on how Jesus died. He could have just corrected me, but he insulted me because Sultan is the great Islam King.. Isn't that a little extreme to you? Sultan has a grudge against me because the very people who are against him on this forum are giving me thumbs up. He finds if so offensive that a "Muslim" is going against another "Muslim". In this Muslim community all you hear about is "poor Arafat". All you hear from me is "who the hell cares you're not a Palestinian so stop caring so much".
The Taliban are extremeists. Did I ever indicate they are not? And I care for the Palestinian situatino because while the most important thing is that they receive a nation of their own, at the same time Muslims also have a concern for the maintencince of areas such as Al Quds, etc.~ Muslims, Christians and Jews all have a stake in that region of the world and the hard part is finding a position where all are satisfied. That, and I am Arab also so seeing your arab neighbors losing their land, and then the arabs next to them treat them like dirt kind of upsets me.

What makes you think there are not a lot of Aimsters out there. Because where you come from people are like Sultan? I told you Islam is different for each culture.
I came from Iraq and moved here at age one. I grew up in America under my parents, both whom are Engineers. A moderate Muslim does not hold your views, and I have met many. I am not trying to anger you or anything, becausein the end we are both Muslims (Though you have stated you are muslim, and you aren't in several threads). The post had two aims: 1) that while i'm sure muslims hold your views, they are not as dominated as you make it seem. Actually, since Sultan is pretty extreme and I've never met a guy who agrees with death for his kids and is a Muslim, perhaps it is a 1:1 ratio, because extremeists (on both sides) are not very common, although they are the ones that make the most noise.

Sultan is not a Muslim Scholar. It is like a Christian here making a thread on Christianity. Will he have all the answers? no. This thread might as well be called "Sultan's view on Islam".
Nope he isn't. But the answers he is givng out so far are the truth from a literal standpoint. Do i necessarily agree with the interpreation of a literal standpoint? No...and that makes all the difference in the world
And please don't think i'm "against" you at all Aimster. We are all Muslims and if we all though the same way and interpreted the Quran in the same manner I would find that scary, although I wouldn't mind getting rid of the Bin Laden element because many Americans who know little about the religion think we are all like that.

Oh and you are in medical school? Wow congrats!!! Serious, that is something really difficult and I coped out and decided to go with engineering because there is just no chance I can be a doctor...too much of an effort for me.


What does a muslim need to do in order to go to heaven? There is a heaven in Islam right?

Are most Islamic scholars in agreement to what needs to be done to be "saved"?
Oooh lemme asnwer. Hahah actually chances are Sultan and MEgaworks will disagree, but I've thought of this for a long time (seocnd part, not the not being saved part ) Well first of all I don't understand the concept of being "saved". I have nothing to be saved from. I was not born sinful at all or anything, and the conept of original sin is absent from the Quran. WhetherI go to Heaven (yes there is one) or Hell is determined by my actions alone.
But to me, what do I need to go to to heaven? I think the most important thing is to be a good person. TO ME, that supercedes being a muslim or a jew or christian or even agnostic (though Aethist is a different story because they beleive for CERTAIN that God does not exist). In my life I have met many good Muslims according whta I see as good, and also I have met "false" muslims. Those who say they are Muslim but in realty are just a peice of trash. And it makes me realize that there are people who say they are muslim, but are horrible...but there are people who aren't muslim that are among the nicest people i've met. It makes me wonder why someone could exist. We all calim to know the right interpretaion of God. I'm sure some things we interpret correctly, and in other things we do not. But in the end, it is god who knows the real interpretaiton and judgement isn't cast upon you by your peers, judgement is cast soley by God therefore every person is an individual case that God will judge. That is why I think you can be any religion or even wondering if god exists, but as long as you are a person then it is up to god, not up to the interpretation of the books by our peers.
I guess to me that invites the diea "well then I don't have to be a Muslim to get into Heaven therefore I can be a good person and beleive in what I want to, so if I am right i don't get screwed whereas you do~ and if you are right then i still have a chance"...and i'm sure someone thought of that reading this....and well alll i have to say is ~ That doesn't mean I'm any less of a Muslim and I try to "relax" things on prupose...I really think interpretation is the key to all, and its hard to see "when should one interpret and when should one take literally" and things like prayer or not eating pork and asting I beleive should be taken literally, whereas the Shariah shouldn;t.
Note: my views are NOT held by the majority of Muslims. I know this for a fact. So take this for what you will.


As for the story of the Quran and when iit was put down into book form, I would expect sultan to provide this answer better than I could I know the story but not to the details that sultan could. But essentially when they decided to compile it because they feared that over time it could change, they went through one of the most meticulous capmisngs to "prove" the ayat (verses) were the same that were revelaed to the prophet. The same intense scrutiny was applied to the Sunnah. So I do hope that sultan provides a better answer since at things like this where no interpreation is needed his knowledge shines.
 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Google is giving me conflicting results. Some sites claim Muhammad wrote the Quran wwhile others claim that the hadith(?) teaches that Muhammad was illiterate.

One of the sites I found said at first some groups had differing memorizations of the Quran and some guy ordered an official version be printed to avoid any more confusion. Text

So how can you be so sure that the version this guy ordered printed was the accurate version.

Also what does the (S.A) mean when placed after the word prophet?

Here's the most comprehensive answer to your question. Please read Link

Thank you for asking. It helped me learn quite a bit too.

Thanks for the link. I must admit I am skeptical of the source though. In my search for knowledge about Christianity I have come to the conclusion that I cannot always trust answers given by churches or preachers when it comes to the bible. Often I try to find additional sources of information by skeptics/non-believers that can be less biased. The same is true in my hunt for answers about Islam.

It is kind of hard to find good answers from former muslims(aspostates) though. I suppose thats because they value their lives somewhat and fear the repurcussions of publicly aspostizing. So the only source I have been able find is one from a Christian perspective which means theres an inherent bias. Here is the link. It is nice in that it gives a different viewpoint to the link you posted but still addresses the same topics.

Let me know what you think.

 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
Excellent answer magomago.

What do you think of this quote by the great Thomas Jefferson;
"He who steadily observes those moral precepts in which all religions concur, will never be questioned at the gates of heaven, as to the dogmas in which they all differ."

 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Excellent answer magomago.

What do you think of this quote by the great Thomas Jefferson;
"He who steadily observes those moral precepts in which all religions concur, will never be questioned at the gates of heaven, as to the dogmas in which they all differ."

Hrmmm...to a degree yes. Because I think the "moral precepts" in which all religion concur...I don't think these moral precepts are those of religion. Liek I said, The Quran states (and I agree) that humans are intrinsically good (although we can easily be led astray and people like Bin Laden, Falwell, ultra orthodox Rabbis aare perfect examples of humans led astray) so I think that there are morals that exist abent from religion. Do not kill, do not steal, do not commit adultery, do not kill your kids and more are things that we view as morally correct even if we have no religio nand do not beleive in God. Find me a civilization that espouses these beleifs and I'll show you why it didn't last very long.
But obvoiusly there are differences between religions, and that is what Jefferson points out. I totally reject the notion of many Gods, or the idea that you can pray to "God" via "mini gods" such as Hindus do. I also totally reject the concept of the Trinity and the fact that God had a son (although i beleive in Jesus as a prophet of God). Because I beleive these are the truths that exist, and if you disagree with me-->great, but I think you are wrong. That would obviously be a "mark" against you come judgement day, and it really depends if you have more "hasanat" (good deeds) than "say-yeeaat" (Bad deeds). So even if you beleive in something different than me, while I think i won't be penalized as much as you, I still think its possible to go to heaven. That is where the basis of my view that all you have to be is a good person in order to get to heaven. Islam, even more Muslims, isn't a "believe and you get in" like the beleif in Christianity that we damned to burn in hell unless we accept Jesus as our "savior"; because in the Christian view if you aren't Christian...sucks to be you. That and Hell in the Quran (if I' wrong fix this part for me Sultan because I think that as a Muslim I'm always learning~I had to make a choice a few years back on what the right religion is more me because at a time I did doubt so i did do a lot of reserach before I decided that Islam was right, but its been around 4 years since that time) is described as a place that everyone will have to go. Some people who are very good will only feel the heat below their feet as they quick glide across hell to go to heaven (obvoiusly this is all metaphorical ) whereas some people will have to take more onerous (lol even the right word? it just came ot me) paths. But ultimately even if it takes a billion years b/c you were that much of an ass you will get there.

But I think overall that Jefferson is correct, although I contest the idea that religion is the source of morals(if that is what he implies although knowing Jefferson he probably didn't mean it like that). If anything it just extolled these morals so many times we automatically associate morals with religion.

I think what affected my views the most was my mother. Btw in my post above I don't mean that All Muslims I have met are bad: that simply isn't true. But what I say that the nicest people I know I think they will go to heaven REGARDLESS of what they are (Again, unless one is aethist because they beleive for fact god does not exist).. When I was little my mom knew two nice old ladies named "Mary" and "Cathy" in the late 80s. They were very nice to her and they ended up becoming very good friends, and one day when my mom found out one was sick she said "I hope to God she is fine and may god help her" (obvoiusly in arabic and wsan't exact the exact words this was a long time ago) and I asked her "Why pray for her mama? She is a Christian" obvoiusly being 4-5 years old you don't know much and she said "She is a good person and God will also allow the genuinely good people to go to heaven". That, along with reading the Quran and seeing things, is what shaped my view. But I wouldn't every change my religion regardless just because I don't think I have to be Muslim~ a friend whome I told this has said "why don't i become christian because if I'm right then you are safe eitther way" and I dn't see why since I beleive I have found truth and following the pillars of Islam brings me my own peace and calm with the world ~

tho the side effect of this is me not wanting to preach/spread the word whatever since i really think it all depends on your actions. The only problem is that puts me at odds with a lot of Christians So I usually avoid reilgious discussions in general (tho i do have exceptions) because when they tell you "Its my job to save you because I think you are a good person and if you don't accept Christ as your lord and savior you will go to hell" its kind of hard to have a discussion with the "beleive or die" logic.
And sorry for the sidetrack okay, sleepy time

edit:
oh and i think a lot of people on the forums who may read this may think "well great gee willy then i'll just be what i am and i'll be fine" well 1) this imy view and 2) a lot of people here have a deep hatred for Islam so I don't think you will go anywhere anyways with such intense hatred I just find it amazing how much Islamic Bashing I find. There is a LOT of Christian bashing as well(probably slightly more than ISlamic Bashing) , but I've noticed the "concentartion of hatred" per post (haha i'm investing my own terms) is definitely higher.

iedi2:
oh and my posts are related to the qusetion that was ask "to me personally as muslim" . Notice the "personally as a muslim" part. What I say is not islamic law in that regard. So don't thin I speak the truth because I maybe al-dajal(anti chrsit) in disguise since my views can easily "bring people of all nations together" in that sense And excuse my spelling
 

bim27142

Senior member
Oct 6, 2004
213
0
0
Originally posted by: kotss
from Sultan
I agree with your post. I dont know why you seem to believe I differ.
Text

I do not believe you differ. I was actually in a way supporting you.
My actual statement said that Just because it is stated that males and females can be married at puberty does not mean it is COMMONPLACE now.

I am saying, I do not believe it is commonplace.

*************************************************************************************

Does it state anywhere in the Quran, how Islamics are to treat non-Islamics.
What I mean is does it teach patience and understanding?
Does the Quran state that non-Islamics are to be converted to Islam?

Just curious. I do not know.
it is not stated in the Quran that non-moslems be converted by force... however should it is taught that they should defend their religion no matter what...it's just that many moslems are still treating Quaran literally and they are very conservative, it's like they are not living in the year 2004...some kill for religion(ignorants) because by doing so they go to paradise, can you see any logic behind that? i just dont know why they do so...people in the middle ages kill for religion,just like many spaniards(spreading catholicism) in the 15th century, should you not convert, you die...i think that's what's happening in today's radical islamist, their narrow conservative minds thinks everything in the modern world is leading to evil deeds...if we take a look back at ancient history,it's kinda ugly and people before seems so uncivilized if we try to look at it now...i think again, radical islamist are still stuck on that mindset...but their are still many moslems that are coping up with the modern world, most educated ones are coping up quite nicely...but the poor uneducated ones, they are the one's prone to the feeds of terrorism knowledge by some backward mentallity moslems...
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Thanks for the link. I must admit I am skeptical of the source though. In my search for knowledge about Christianity I have come to the conclusion that I cannot always trust answers given by churches or preachers when it comes to the bible. Often I try to find additional sources of information by skeptics/non-believers that can be less biased. The same is true in my hunt for answers about Islam.

It is kind of hard to find good answers from former muslims(aspostates) though. I suppose thats because they value their lives somewhat and fear the repurcussions of publicly aspostizing. So the only source I have been able find is one from a Christian perspective which means theres an inherent bias. Here is the link. It is nice in that it gives a different viewpoint to the link you posted but still addresses the same topics.

Let me know what you think.

Thank you for the link you provided. It is a quite an elaborate piece, and it is a good perspective to look at things.

The authenticity of the Quran is held true as a belief by Muslims. And that belief has had many detractors amongst the anti-Islam crowd. When one questions the virtues of men, either who received the revelation, those who memorized it, or those who compiled it, then suppositions take over, and to refute that supposition, one would need to be physically present at the time of revelations, memorizations and recording.

With regards to your comparison with the Bible, please note that currently there exists 24000 different versions today. Versions does not imply translations. Versions mean whole chapters have been added, deleted or modified. Currently the more popular version is the King James bible. I may be incorrect in quoting the number of the different versions, but if you do a google, you're sure to come up with many.

 

woodman1999

Golden Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,700
106
106
Alright, this question may have already been asked but here is what I want to know: When Muslims in the US are asked about the members of their religion who are killing in the name of this religion, they are appalled by it and denounce it. Why is it that Muslim leaders in the Middle East rarely if ever denounce these terrosists who are performing this act? Are they scared of possible retribution against their country? Do they privately agree with terrorist activities?

Also, I have heard a lot about the Muslim religion being that of peace. How can these terrorists justify their actions in the name of peace when all it has done is cause unnnecssary death and destruction of human life?

I think these two problems, no public denouncement of terrorists by Islamic leaders, and the claim of a peaceful religion, is what pisses most Americans off. If this is truly a vicious religion at heart, than admit to it!
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: woodman1999
Alright, this question may have already been asked but here is what I want to know: When Muslims in the US are asked about the members of their religion who are killing in the name of this religion, they are appalled by it and denounce it. Why is it that Muslim leaders in the Middle East rarely if ever denounce these terrosists who are performing this act? Are they scared of possible retribution against their country? Do they privately agree with terrorist activities?

Also, I have heard a lot about the Muslim religion being that of peace. How can these terrorists justify their actions in the name of peace when all it has done is cause unnnecssary death and destruction of human life?

I think these two problems, no public denouncement of terrorists by Islamic leaders, and the claim of a peaceful religion, is what pisses most Americans off. If this is truly a vicious religion at heart, than admit to it!

This topic of denounciation and action against terrorist elements in countries of Muslim majority has been raised again and again. I have answered it in the past. This is a false charge. All leaders of Muslim nations and scholars of the religion have denounced terrorist acts. Heck, Yasser Arafat who half of (witless) America call a terrorist donated blood for the victims of 9/11. Actions against terrorists have been taken by Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, etc, etc and are continuing.

Yes, Islam is a religion of peace. Whoever commits these acts of violence are madmen, and there is no justification whatsoever for their attacks. There was no justification for 9/11, there is no justification to our actions in Iraq.

Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion

 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
All leaders of Muslim nations and scholars of the religion have denounced terrorist acts.
Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion

How do you explain some of the clerics within Iraq, Saudi, England and elsewhere that are encouraging their followers to attack non-Muslims.

What should be done by the Muslim people with respect to this. These radical clerics are twisting/perverting the Islamic religion (possible by taking religious phrases out of context) and instigating trouble against their own countrymen and Westerners.

 

woodman1999

Golden Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,700
106
106
Originally posted by: Sultan


This topic of denounciation and action against terrorist elements in countries of Muslim majority has been raised again and again. I have answered it in the past. This is a false charge. All leaders of Muslim nations and scholars of the religion have denounced terrorist acts. Heck, Yasser Arafat who half of (witless) America call a terrorist donated blood for the victims of 9/11. Actions against terrorists have been taken by Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, etc, etc and are continuing.

Yes, Islam is a religion of peace. Whoever commits these acts of violence are madmen, and there is no justification whatsoever for their attacks. There was no justification for 9/11, there is no justification to our actions in Iraq.

Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion

I am not trying to be an a$$hole. I simply have not heard these statements before. If you could simply provide some links to when these statements were made, than I will be satisfied.

No justification for 9/11? According to those linked with it, it was to hit the Western Civilization, and a primarily non-Muslim society. That was their justification for it. That terrorist attack had quite a bit to do with religion. If some people weren't so thick headed in "my religion or no religion" there wouldn't be sucha big issue, and I am referring not only to Muslims, but Jewish people in Israel as well.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion


you just lost all credibility. Terrorst attacks/acts have EVERYTHING to do with the muslim religion. when was the last time you saw a Shinto monk, or Bhuddist Monk, Mormon Clergyman, Pentacostal Priest, Baptist Preacher, American Indian Shaman... telling their followers to go kill all the non belivers of their religion??????
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Sultan
All leaders of Muslim nations and scholars of the religion have denounced terrorist acts.
Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion

How do you explain some of the clerics within Iraq, Saudi, England and elsewhere that are encouraging their followers to attack non-Muslims.

What should be done by the Muslim people with respect to this. These radical clerics are twisting/perverting the Islamic religion (possible by taking religious phrases out of context) and instigating trouble against their own countrymen and Westerners.

Every religion has its Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. It is unfortunate that Muslims have to tolerate more of these in these times.

A Muslim should ignore such radical clerics. I believe that is what you would do in the case of Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: Citrix
Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion


you just lost all credibility. Terrorst attacks/acts have EVERYTHING to do with the muslim religion. when was the last time you saw a Shinto monk, or Bhuddist Monk, Mormon Clergyman, Pentacostal Priest, Baptist Preacher, American Indian Shaman... telling their followers to go kill all the non belivers of their religion??????

Thank you for your hate-mongering post. If you have any question about Islamic beliefs, please ask. I can answer your ridiculous question with pages and pages of information.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: woodman1999
I am not trying to be an a$$hole. I simply have not heard these statements before. If you could simply provide some links to when these statements were made, than I will be satisfied.

No justification for 9/11? According to those linked with it, it was to hit the Western Civilization, and a primarily non-Muslim society. That was their justification for it. That terrorist attack had quite a bit to do with religion. If some people weren't so thick headed in "my religion or no religion" there wouldn't be sucha big issue, and I am referring not only to Muslims, but Jewish people in Israel as well.

I am glad you contributed to this post, and I never intended offense.

You have never heard these statements because they are simply not carried by the US media. This is not new. This forum is full of threads with information that the US media does not carry. Please just google keywords such as "muslim denounce 9/11" and I am sure you'll come up with many hits.

Heres a link for the above:
Link

This link itself has many links within itself.

The justification you cite for 9/11 is incorrect. Please read Osama bin Laden's full speech posted here: Link

Some key points from the above:

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom.

If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - may Allah have mercy on them.

Thank you.
 

woodman1999

Golden Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,700
106
106
I looked at that link on about.com with the quotes. I can see quotes from different organizations, but really only 1 from a country's leader. Saudi Arabia denouncing this is, let's face it, not a surprise. But what about Iran, Syria, even Egypt or Israel? I am looking for quotes from more than just our lapdog.

However, I was not aware of the quotes by the groups. This has somewhat enlightened me into soem of the true feelings of Muslims around the globe.

I haven't gotten a chance to look at that Bin Laden speech yet. I'll look later...
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: woodman1999
I looked at that link on about.com with the quotes. I can see quotes from different organizations, but really only 1 from a country's leader. Saudi Arabia denouncing this is, let's face it, not a surprise. But what about Iran, Syria, even Egypt or Israel? I am looking for quotes from more than just our lapdog.

However, I was not aware of the quotes by the groups. This has somewhat enlightened me into soem of the true feelings of Muslims around the globe.

I haven't gotten a chance to look at that Bin Laden speech yet. I'll look later...

Thank you for your post. I am glad a different perspective has made a difference on your opinion. I'm sure you will find all leaders of the world condemning 9/11 attacks. I use the 9/11 attacks just as one example. Here's where you'll get actual quotes from the world's leaders regarding 9/11.

Link
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Sultan
All leaders of Muslim nations and scholars of the religion have denounced terrorist acts.
Terrorist acts have nothing to do with any religion

How do you explain some of the clerics within Iraq, Saudi, England and elsewhere that are encouraging their followers to attack non-Muslims.

What should be done by the Muslim people with respect to this. These radical clerics are twisting/perverting the Islamic religion (possible by taking religious phrases out of context) and instigating trouble against their own countrymen and Westerners.

Every religion has its Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. It is unfortunate that Muslims have to tolerate more of these in these times.

A Muslim should ignore such radical clerics. I believe that is what you would do in the case of Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell.

The concern is that what a "good" Muslim should do and what is being done.

To use your example, Pat and Jerry are not stating that one should perform a religious cleansing of the country.

The radial clearics are. And very few Muslim leaders are speaking out against them nor are the governments closing down the cleric schools where they are promoting behaivor that is not acceptible to the Islamic faith as practived by good Muslims.

That lack of condemnation is what has the rest of the world concerned and generates the misplaced hatred/fear of the Muslims. Most of the leaders of the Arab/Muslim countries do not stop this spewed poison and many within their government financially support it.

The general Muslim community (world wide) has not shown that they are repulsed by what the clerics are doing and these "freedom fighters" in there treatment of hostages and civilians.

 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
The concern is that what a "good" Muslim should do and what is being done.

To use your example, Pat and Jerry are not stating that one should perform a religious cleansing of the country.

The radial clearics are. And very few Muslim leaders are speaking out against them nor are the governments closing down the cleric schools where they are promoting behaivor that is not acceptible to the Islamic faith as practived by good Muslims.

That lack of condemnation is what has the rest of the world concerned and generates the misplaced hatred/fear of the Muslims. Most of the leaders of the Arab/Muslim countries do not stop this spewed poison and many within their government financially support it.

The general Muslim community (world wide) has not shown that they are repulsed by what the clerics are doing and these "freedom fighters" in there treatment of hostages and civilians.

What? Which cleric advocated the "religious cleansing" of the country? Some non-Muslims in this forum have more information about Muslims than Muslims themselves.

Many statements have been issued by leaders of Muslim nations, scholars, and Muslims in general with respect to terrorist acts. I gave the example of denouncing 9/11 attack above as one such case. If you choose to be deaf to such statements, there's nothing I can do to convince you otherwise.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Have you thought that perhaps just because some Mulims are not as vocal that the "silent majority" opposes what is going on? Lack on Condemnation=! approval (or whichever way its supposed to go I'm not a programmer ).

I Know MANY Muslims who disagreed with Bin Laden's bombing of the towers and they thought it hurt Muslims more than anything...but they keep their opinion to themself.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: magomago
Have you thought that perhaps just because some Mulims are not as vocal that the "silent majority" opposes what is going on? Lack on Condemnation=! approval (or whichever way its supposed to go I'm not a programmer ).

I Know MANY Muslims who disagreed with Bin Laden's bombing of the towers and they thought it hurt Muslims more than anything...but they keep their opinion to themself.

hey, I disagree with OBL, and I think it hurt Muslims more than anything (just including my own personal opinion)
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Another one;

What is the difference between the Qu'ran and a Sunnah? Actually what is Sunnah?

The Quran is the word of God
No, the quran is the written word of men or women that felt the need to have a written version of the words that Muhammad spoke. Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of God and claimed that God revealed a final message to him in visions. The visions, pure or watered down, were interpreted by an illiterate man, thus the simplicity of the Quran. The Quran is not the written word of God. That would require faith to believe and we do know the meaning of faith, don't we?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |