The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 100 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,656
10,519
136
The other accusations against Kavanaugh never solidified as anything substantial, they were part of the Avenatti circus.

There are two comparisons, Trump to Biden and Biden to Kavanaugh.

Republicans are hypocrites to accuse Biden given their support of Trump.

Democrats are hypocrites for attacking Reade given their support of Dr. Ford.
You have no idea what hypocrisy is.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
Repeated attempts to smell hair after being informed that the behavior is unwanted would rise to the level of harassment, not assault. Smelling a person's hair one time or even a few times when that person has never asked you to stop would not be either.

To note, in the military or in places like Oregon it can be criminal. A single whiff though would probably never be convicted or even brought up. But if someone did it every day to another person after being asked to stop and it could be proven that the person was using the act for sexual gratification or to sexually demean the person they were doing it to then someone could certainly end up in prison for it. Granted there is a lot of conditions to that. Some places would label the actions of sexual assault. Others as sexual deviancy charges. But yes one could go to jail for smelling another person's hair without consent in this country.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Again this is credibility of individuals involved. Ford kept the accusation to state representative in efforts stop the nomination. But her story of Kavanaugh getting black out drunk falls in line with many others during his college days. Again, if there were as many accusers again Biden we would have believed Reade’s allegations more initially.
Kavanaugh and Biden are both facing the same number of credible acusers.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,724
25,070
136
To note, in the military or in places like Oregon it can be criminal. A single whiff though would probably never be convicted or even brought up. But if someone did it every day to another person after being asked to stop and it could be proven that the person was using the act for sexual gratification or to sexually demean the person they were doing it to then someone could certainly end up in prison for it. Granted there is a lot of conditions to that. Some places would label the actions of sexual assault. Others as sexual deviancy charges. But yes one could go to jail for smelling another person's hair without consent in this country.
Notice how you have to add more complications to your original simple statement to make it even plausible?

That indicates your original statement was horse shit.
 
Reactions: dank69

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
3 separate people claimed similar experiences with Kavanaugh during the time he went to college. Nobody else has accused Biden of anything like Tara's story over a what? 40+ year career?

Corroboration of Ford's accusation can be found here:





So I take it you haven't had harassment training recently.
The Dr. Ford corroborations are no different than Reade’s. The Kavanaugh college allegations never went anywhere.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,396
4,632
136
The Dr. Ford corroborations are no different than Reade’s. The Kavanaugh college allegations never went anywhere.
Because the senate committee gave such narrow focus that the FBI can investigate.

And yeah totally ignore past behaviour but yet demanding Reade’s word by itself be accepted.
 
Reactions: Aegeon

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Again this is credibility of individuals involved. Ford kept the accusation to state representative in efforts stop the nomination. But her story of Kavanaugh getting black out drunk falls in line with many others during his college days. Again, if there were as many accusers again Biden we would have believed Reade’s allegations more initially.

They love talking about Kavanaugh because it's something that can't be resolved unless he confesses or she recants. Opinion will always be contestable. It's a way to elevate Reade's story In a way it doesn't deserve. Only a fool would believe her, and only a propagandist would pretend to. Her year later stealth edit of her Medium post was a scurrilous act of dishonesty. The original contradicted a charge of sexual misconduct while the revised version supported it. It's right there, reeking to high Heaven.


No rational person would believe anything she says.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Because the senate committee gave such narrow focus that the FBI can investigate.

And yeah totally ignore past behaviour but yet demanding Reade’s word by itself be accepted.
So you think its appropriate for the FBI to investigate if a nominee drank in college, given that there was not one allegation of misconduct against Kavanaugh during his entire career, and he has actually done a lot of good for women in his career. Not one of his many female clerks came forward to demonstrate a pattern of behavior.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,839
49,548
136
So you think its appropriate for the FBI to investigate if a nominee drank in college, given that there was not one allegation of misconduct against Kavanaugh during his entire career, and he has actually done a lot of good for women in his career. Not one of his many female clerks came forward to demonstrate a pattern of behavior.

I think it is appropriate for the FBI to investigate if people have perjured themselves before Congress, yes. Do you disagree?
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
I like totally missed the mark but nailed it.

😂
If it makes you feel better. I was wrong in making it too generalized. It wasn't horseshit though. If it makes you feel better to think it was horseshit then whatever floats your boat. I have no problems admitting mistakes or things I am wrong about. The statement wasn't wrong, the presentation of the statement was though.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,396
4,632
136
Okay I’ll concede that Kavanaugh has had a spotless professional career. But still doesn’t discredit college life of being a drunk that forced himself on others
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,607
29,330
136
To note, in the military or in places like Oregon it can be criminal. A single whiff though would probably never be convicted or even brought up. But if someone did it every day to another person after being asked to stop and it could be proven that the person was using the act for sexual gratification or to sexually demean the person they were doing it to then someone could certainly end up in prison for it. Granted there is a lot of conditions to that. Some places would label the actions of sexual assault. Others as sexual deviancy charges. But yes one could go to jail for smelling another person's hair without consent in this country.
If if if. If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a bicycle. Has anyone accused Biden of sniffing someone's hair every day after being asked to stop? No? Then you concede that Biden is not accused of doing anything that qualifies as sexual assault except by Reade.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
I think it is appropriate for the FBI to investigate if people have perjured themselves before Congress, yes. Do you disagree?
You and I have agreed that Kavanaugh’s alleged perjury is a separate issue and I would not protest his removal over said perjury.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
So, are you saying that Reade is credible or that Ford is not credible?
I am saying that we shouldn’t politically weaponize sexual assault allegations.

Both Reade and Dr. Ford are credible. In both cases, there are also other factors that extend a benefit of the doubt to the accused.

I will say both cases were not handled consistently, and that is the failing in all of this.

Both women are victims of political tribalism.
 
Reactions: HumblePie

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
I am saying that we shouldn’t politically weaponize sexual assault allegations.

Both Reade and Dr. Ford are credible. In both cases, there are also other factors that extend a benefit of the doubt to the accused.

I will say both cases were not handled consistently, and that is the failing in all of this.

Both women are victims of political tribalism.

Perhaps you could define "credible" in your usage here. And also define what burden of proof you would want to see. And also define what action you would like to see as a result of that burden of proof being met. And in what manner such an accusation should be handled to examine that evidence.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,607
29,330
136
Perhaps you could define "credible" in your usage here. And also define what burden of proof you would want to see. And also define what action you would like to see as a result of that burden of proof being met. And in what manner such an accusation should be handled to examine that evidence.
Starbuck doesn't care about the victims. He assumes all politicians are pieces of shit so sexually assaulting people should not be disqualifying for anyone.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Perhaps you could define "credible" in your usage here.
Consistency and corroboration means they shouldn’t be dismissed

And also define what burden of proof you would want to see.
Independent investigations with full transparency

And also define what action you would like to see as a result of that burden of proof being met.
Political parties holding their own members accountable to a standard of ethical behavior instead of the opposing having to do it for them.

And in what manner such an accusation should be handled to examine that evidence.
That’s where it breaks down because any system will lean in bias towards the accuser or the accused. I would prefer a world where we target the factors that tend to enable sexual assault to begin with. Zero tolerance alcohol policies for athletes, fraternities and sororities would be a start.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |