The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 103 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,822
10,361
136

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,077
136

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,077
136
That's due to how they handled it.
By testing the veracity of her claims? Particularly when she was not entirely credible from the start and now it's fairly obvious she's had a troubled relationship with the truth in general throughout her professional life?

Can you point to a general sentiment among Democrats or Biden that all accusers should be believed without any verification whatsoever?

There's nothing wrong with initially believing Reade, in fact, we should believe accusers initially which should lead to immediately start verifying stories. If problems arise, we need to reevaluate.

I don't know why you can't just admit she's turned out not to be a credible person. Nor credible in her particular account of assault (since certainly habitual liars can still be assaulted).

BernieBros man...
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
That's uhm... Not good. It doesn't seem she badly misrepresented her credentials at court, but if she put out there under oath a degree she did not earn, that's plenty significant. It seems like the pattern is reporting a degree from Antioch University which she did not have. But she does have a law degree. It leads to the question of whether she entered law school via fraud.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,395
4,631
136
If she really is an advocate of #MeToo, it’s bad enough to stretch a true claim of sexual harassment to assault. If she’s done it to others before, just so she can get paid for her “expert” testimony. But what kangaroo court would base their verdict on her word? There has to be other evidence against the accused that got them convicted. So these defense lawyers are stretching it to get their clients off on this.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,843
9,092
136
Because she appears to have lied about her credentials, convictions she testified to as an expert witness are now being reviewed due to concerns that she has perjured herself.


I take it that when your famous lawyer drops you like a hot potato only 2 weeks after taking your case, that’s not a good sign.
 

DisarmedDespot

Senior member
Jun 2, 2016
590
591
136
Yeah... I think it's safe to say this story is over. The only question is if the conservative mediaphere will try to keep it alive, but they seem to be bored of it already.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,843
9,092
136
Yeah... I think it's safe to say this story is over. The only question is if the conservative mediaphere will try to keep it alive, but they seem to be bored of it already.

The fact that Fox News hasn’t offered her an exclusive interview is telling. I doubt she’ll be able to Diamond and Silk her way into any money over this.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
The fact that Fox News hasn’t offered her an exclusive interview is telling. I doubt she’ll be able to Diamond and Silk her way into any money over this.

Money aside, she could actually get herself in substantial trouble here. If she testified to the court that she has a degree she doesn't have, that's perjury. If she obtained her law license by lying about her credentials to get into law school that sounds like something that could get her disbarred.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
This is why she was cool with testifying under oath but not taking the polygraph. She is used to lying under oath.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,459
987
126
Like I said, grifters gonna grift. Glad theres going to be one less grifter now that she’s completely and totally exposed as the obvious fraud she is.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Money aside, she could actually get herself in substantial trouble here. If she testified to the court that she has a degree she doesn't have, that's perjury. If she obtained her law license by lying about her credentials to get into law school that sounds like something that could get her disbarred.

She never passed the bar exam & never practiced law per se.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Like I said, grifters gonna grift. Glad theres going to be one less grifter now that she’s completely and totally exposed as the obvious fraud she is.
She probably raised some gofundme dough, and I suspect her newfound love of Russia was not complementary either.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Yeah... I think it's safe to say this story is over. The only question is if the conservative mediaphere will try to keep it alive, but they seem to be bored of it already.

They're already starting to lean into their Ukrainian flim-flam-



Let the slime-fest circus begin!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
They're already starting to lean into their Ukrainian flim-flam-



Let the slime-fest circus begin!
Hey wait, didn't the president say those subpoenas are invalid because they don't pertain to pending legislation?
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
The fact that Fox News hasn’t offered her an exclusive interview is telling. I doubt she’ll be able to Diamond and Silk her way into any money over this.

Guarantee you Trump will keep bringing it up during campaigning / debates.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Well, well, well, well... Say it ain't so.



I'm sure all the bad actors will be back to "But, Biden."

♪♫ it's a terrible sight, I'm laughin' tonight, walkin' in a blown-out libertarian wonderland...... ♪♫
 
Last edited:
Reactions: hal2kilo

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Because she appears to have lied about her credentials, convictions she testified to as an expert witness are now being reviewed due to concerns that she has perjured herself.


Pretty much means she messed over a lot of women that needed an advocate that they could trust.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Guarantee you Trump will keep bringing it up during campaigning / debates.

It hasn't been a Trump thing but rather a GOP/ faux Bernie bro concern troll thing. I think the one thing Trump has said about it was that he hoped it wasn't true for Biden's sake.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,395
4,631
136
Dems should just let them get these Blue Star documents. It won’t be a clown show until they bring in people to testify.
 
Last edited:

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,822
10,361
136
Dems should just let them get these documents. It won’t be a clown show until they bring in people to testify.

for those opposing biden, it's better that the documents never get released. releasing the documents provides definitive evidence. if they're never released, you can just keep speculating till the cows come home with nothing to refute your claims.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Dems should just let them get these documents. It won’t be a clown show until they bring in people to testify.
Get what documents? They don’t exist.

Opening up his documents is exactly what Republicans want so they can dig through them and Hillary’s Emails this.

Biden should offer that he’s willing to open up all his records and those of his running mate as soon as Pence opens all his sealed records and Trump opens up the books on the Trump organization. Fair’s fair!
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |