sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,131
- 5,658
- 126
The burden of proof is always on the positive, not the negative...
I'm not even sure Eski so definitively arguing that it's definitely NOT the mother, it seems his point is just that it's pretty low quality evidence (which it is as it stands), particularly compared to sworn testimony before congress.
Like I have alluded to earlier, it is part of a Body of Evidence. These types of allegations rarely have definitive proof.