They have disputed it though, multiple staff members from the time say that everything she describes from the office is false.
They have disputed it though, multiple staff members from the time say that everything she describes from the office is false.But if Biden can dispute the circumstances of how she left, they would have already. So unfortunately this part is fishy on his part.
But if Biden can dispute the circumstances of how she left, they would have already. So unfortunately this part is fishy on his part.
So the answer is no? You should post the evidence you are referring to instead of expecting us to search around for it.
Lol.It is very odd and damaging to his credibility that he can unseal those records and answer these questions and he has chosen not to.
Very odd.
Very damaging to his credibility.
No you keep telling yourself that....Yes yes, keep telling yourself that.
You know theres usually more than 2 parties that will be on the ticket, right?
His political movement ended the day he endorsed Joe Biden for president.
Have you offered any evidence besides the Krassenstein's Medium post? Asking earnestly because if you have I'll look at it, but I went back about 10 pages or so and didn't see anything.
You misspelled porpoises.Right...But for all intensive purposes a vote for these parties is a vote for Trump
I did post the evidence, it’s all in one convenient place in that medium article!
That’s kind of funny though, you complain about the article being a single source and then say I should collect the evidence in a single source for you. Haha.
Lol.
It’s very damaging to Obama that he could release his long form birth certificate and has chosen not to.
Very odd.
Very damaging to his credibility.
I’m not even sure what record you think would be relevant here. I’m pretty sure you don’t even know or haven’t thought it through. After all you apparently thought she was still some senate staffer as recently as yesterday.
So to be clear you are saying the statements it credits to her are fabricated and her former employer fabricated the events she describes and the email correspondence between them?That's not evidence that's a collection of smears gathered by Russiagate grifters that were banned by Twitter for running a bot farm. They have as much credibility as Alex Jones or James O-Keefe. No one is posting that article except for internet cranks. That's why I asked you where you found it yesterday.
Right...But for all intensive purposes a vote for these parties is a vote for Trump
that is Ok to repeat your handlers wishes....I disagree. Its a vote for Biden.
It’s a vote for the person you don’t want to win.I disagree. Its a vote for Biden.
Not when it involves the electoral college in close states.I disagree. Its a vote for Biden.
It’s a vote for the person you don’t want to win.
At this point even you must want Trump out of office, right? I mean for fuck’s sake look at the absolute shit show his presidency has been and look what it’s done to the conservative party in the US, it’s become a national disgrace.
Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! Ding ding ding! wake up......Ding ding ding! Winner!
And again. I dont vote for the one most likely to win. I vote the way voting should be: the candidate I like the most.
So to be clear you are saying the statements it credits to her are fabricated and her former employer fabricated the events she describes and the email correspondence between them?
Just want to make sure while we are discussing Alex Jones that I get your position down exactly so you can’t pretend you didn’t hold it later.
Then say what you mean, what part of it is a smear? Do the statements it attributes to her lack necessary context? Are they edited? Be specific.If you say you don't trust a video that James O'Keefe produces, are you saying that you believe every statement that appears in the video was fabricated? Man, you absolutely love to put words in people's mouths.
If you say you don't trust a video that James O'Keefe produces, are you saying that you believe every statement that appears in the video was fabricated? Man, you absolutely love to put words in people's mouths.
Then say what you mean, what part of it is a smear? Do the statements it attributes to her lack necessary context? Are they edited? Be specific.
To be clear the only part of the piece that I am interested in is the parts that show her inconsistencies over time and the statement from her former employer that says she lied to and stole from her so please keep your critiques to those.
We can’t move on until you are 100% specific as to your complaints.