Seems that this totally throws her credibility out the window. But do go on.
It's not my job to refute smears.
It goes to credibility, your honor. Reade made a backhanded admission to the fraud, ran a guilt trip on Hummer for calling her out & promised to pay her back when Reade got her mess of a life sorted out. Then bye-bye. Standard perpetual victim scam. And Hummer let it go because it wasn't enough money to make it a big deal. You can't get blood out of a turnip, anyway.
Just to perpetuate them, apparently.
The time period in question, which was nearly 30 years ago. The incident in question, the story hasn't changed, other than she wasn't telling it, to now she is.
Surely you realize if we are going by the legal standard this screws you because there is zero chance Biden would be convicted based on the available evidence.It would not be admissible in a Court of Law. It is completely unrelated.
You do realize all people have made mistakes in life? So that makes it okay for Biden to finger bang her without her permission? Then he blackballed her from a political career. Biden is just another scumbag politician. He is no better than Trump other than he works for your team. Just please get off the soap box you've been standing on. And quit being a scumbag yourself with your smear campaign against this poor woman.It goes to credibility, your honor. Reade made a backhanded admission to the fraud, ran a guilt trip on Hummer for calling her out & promised to pay her back when Reade got her mess of a life sorted out. Then bye-bye. Standard perpetual victim scam. And Hummer let it go because it wasn't enough money to make it a big deal. You can't get blood out of a turnip, anyway.
Surely you realize if we are going by the legal standard this screws you because there is zero chance Biden would be convicted based on the available evidence.
Let me guess though, you want to selectively apply legal rules to this so that you can ignore inconvenient facts.
You do realize all people have made mistakes in life? So that makes it okay for Biden to finger bang her without her permission? Then he blackballed her from a political career.
Biden is just another scumbag politician. He is no better than Trump other than he works for your team. Just please get off the soap box you've been standing on. And quit being a scumbag yourself with your smear campaign against this poor woman.
It is simply astonishing that you think her making multiple conflicting statements about the time period in question has no bearing on the credibility her other statements about the time period in question. There is no way you actually believe this.
It doesn't nullify anything, liars and thieves are sexually assaulted too. If it appears she has lied to and about her other employers though a logical person would conclude that this raises the probability that she is lying about the employer in question. This is common sense.He brought up, "Your Honour". Besides, he's the one concluding that this unrelated incident nullifies her Allegation of Sexual Assault. That's what we call a Non Sequitur.
It's nobody's job to refute smears. I was under the impression you wanted intelligent discussion, but it seems I was wrong.It's not my job to refute smears.
It doesn't nullify anything, liars and thieves are sexually assaulted too. If it appears she has lied to and about her other employers though a logical person would conclude that this raises the probability that she is lying about the employer in question. This is common sense.
It is unrelated. Sorry.
Speaking of Lying, Biden has made some doosies, one that even ended his first Presidential bid. How could you support such a person?? /s
So you don't even understand the simple concept that IF Reade is lying then her accusation against Biden would be a smear. Your problem is that you are operating from the standpoint that it is impossible that Reade is lying. That is a stupid position to hold unless you witnessed the incident yourself.Which smear are you referring to? Quote the post.
Well I mean you already admitted you are immune to evidence so it's not exactly important how you evaluate this.
Well I mean you already admitted you are immune to evidence so it's not exactly important how you evaluate this.
If you think lying to and apparently about one employer does not affect the credibility of claims about another employer that's your business. You are free to be as irrational as you want! Evidence of false claims about other employers would be 100% admissible in court too, btw.
So you don't even understand the simple concept that IF Reade is lying then her accusation against Biden would be a smear. Your problem is that you are operating from the standpoint that it is impossible that Reade is lying. That is a stupid position to hold unless you witnessed the incident yourself.
You do realize all people have made mistakes in life? So that makes it okay for Biden to finger bang her without her permission? Then he blackballed her from a political career. Biden is just another scumbag politician. He is no better than Trump other than he works for your team. Just please get off the soap box you've been standing on. And quit being a scumbag yourself with your smear campaign against this poor woman.
Uhmmm, do you not see how lying about and stealing from a former employer of hers would impact the credibility of her claims about another former employer considering she is the sole source of this allegation and everyone else in the office at the time disputes her claims about it?
Like... seriously? Also, it's interesting that you buy into the claim that she was blackballed by Biden considering her prior version of the story is that he had nothing to do with it and didn't even know why she left. Was she lying then or is she lying now?
You're engaging in motivated reasoning.
Lol, you said in another thread that literally no evidence could change your mind.You're Projecting Bro. Why do you and others Need to discredit every other persons Motivations and Honesty with completely unrelated events? These are not the foundation of Honest Arguments.
fskimospy was the victim of a home invasion where he was anally probed by the intruders handgun.It doesn't nullify anything, liars and thieves are sexually assaulted too. If it appears she has lied to and about her other employers though a logical person would conclude that this raises the probability that she is lying about the employer in question. This is common sense.
Lol. You mean that article that is basically just quotes from her for which you have steadfastly refused to identify any ones you think are false and have instead thrown a temper tantrum about?In case anyone is new to the thread, the "evidence" he's referring to is an article by known grifters that was published on a website with no editorial review, an article that refuses to actually stand behind.
fskimospy was the victim of a home invasion where he was anally probed by the intruders handgun.
Upon further investigation fskimospy was found to have cheated on his first wife causing a divorce. It was determined that the home intruders were not guilty because fskimospy has shown questionable behavior in his past and therefore could be lying about the whole thing.
She's accused others of sexual misconduct besides Biden? Please do provide a link to these events?This is comically wrong.
To put it in more accurate terms, fskimospy files a police report stating OILFIELDTRASH invaded his home. Upon further investigation fskimospy has falsely accused other people of crimes in the past. With this in mind, people view the new accusation skeptically.
Sounds pretty common sense now huh.
She's accused others of sexual misconduct besides Biden? Please do provide a link to these events?