The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 32 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
If I got caught red handed sharing chain-mail level garbage to smear a sexual assault victim, I'd probably just shut the fuck up. But that's just me. You do you.
I don’t understand why you think anyone is going to buy or believe this. You couldn’t refute my argument so you decided to try and make it about something else. It’s totally transparent.

Anyways you can have the last word on this if you want. I’ll continue to post in this thread but I’m not going to respond to your childish stupidity on this anymore.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
The "bothsides" counter point you are making is tired. For many people there is really little difference, that's just a fact you need to grasp as what you value as differentiation of the 2 parties has no value to those needing Healthcare, Debt Relief, and other realworld issues. You are making a variation of the Dubyah argument of "Compassionate Conservatism", except it's more like "Kinder Centrism". "Centrism" being, Low Tax, Fiscal Conservatism, Pro-Corporate, Neo-Liberalism first popularized by Ronald Reagan. That experiment has increasingly ravaged each successive Generation that has lived under it. Which is why the <50 Demographic overwhelmingly supported Bernie over Biden.

Exquisite bullshit. You're actually claiming Reagan was a centrist? And that I am too? The first thing that needs to happen is that we need to strip the GOP of Power. They've been winning at top down class warfare for 40 years behind a screen of insincerity & divisive culture war issues. They have a radical right wing agenda to destroy the federal govt & are ideologically opposed to all the things Liberals & Progressives both want for America. The rest of us, including Biden, are actually reasonable people who really want the same things. We can work it out, but we have to win it all to do so. I'd say the same if my fellow Democrats had chosen Bernie or Liz or whoever. You're not helping. You already know that, of course, which leads me to question your sincerity entirely.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,685
126
I don’t understand why you think anyone is going to buy or believe this. You couldn’t refute my argument so you decided to try and make it about something else. It’s totally transparent.

Anyways you can have the last word on this if you want. I’ll continue to post in this thread but I’m not going to respond to your childish stupidity on this anymore.

They don't have to buy or believe anything; it's all here in black and white. The problem is that there was never any argument to refute. Whenever you were asked for evidence you referred to the article, and when I asked you to vouch for its veracity you pitched a screaming fit. So there's nothing there. I agree, it's totally transparent, your nakedness for the world to see.

I don't care for the last word, it can be all yours, but if you're going to keep posting in this thread I hope you treat the truth with a little more respect.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
Republicans ARE worse than Democrats, but Democrats are not the solution to this nations problems. The impeachment proved that to me, along with everything else Donald has gotten away with.
We need a real solution and its not making itself apparent at this time.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,656
5,346
136
He could rape a woman on 5th Avenue and they'd vote for him, so what's the difference?
None I guess. Though it would be nice if he didn't do it.
I've always thought Joe was creepy, but harmless creepy, like an overly affectionate grandmother.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Blue-Anon is when liberals are talking about Russia shit, analogous to Qanon. Blue MAGA is when liberals are just shitting themselves in general, like MAGA chuds. Now you know, don't you feel special.

So you're Bernie Anon? Or just Bernie MAGA? I mean, wtf do you think? That Dems will abandon Biden over the accusations of a flaky persona like Tara Reade?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Republicans ARE worse than Democrats, but Democrats are not the solution to this nations problems. The impeachment proved that to me, along with everything else Donald has gotten away with.
We need a real solution and its not making itself apparent at this time.

Sweet fucking Jesus. The answer is to vote the GOP out of power. We'll get nowhere until we do.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,394
4,631
136
Sweet fucking Jesus. The answer is to vote the GOP out of power. We'll get nowhere until we do.
Yup baby steps. Reverse the damage from the last 3 years then see where to go from there. Why the far left think such drastic changes will happen immediately
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,685
126
So you're Bernie Anon? Or just Bernie MAGA? I mean, wtf do you think? That Dems will abandon Biden over the accusations of a flaky persona like Tara Reade?

I already said in this thread that the Sanders movement is dead, so no, I don't think Bernie Anon or Bernie MAGA would really land. Keep trying though buddy, you'll get it.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Yup baby steps. Reverse the damage from the last 3 years then see where to go from there. Why the far left think such drastic changes will happen immediately
Yes, if people think that electing Democrats is not the answer that’s fine but in that case they should explain the basic process by which they think they will achieve better results. In my experience the answers range from magical thinking (everyone will realize the far left is right and vote them in) to downright horrifying (allow the country to collapse into right wing authoritarianism and then the revolution will come).
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,131
5,658
126
Exquisite bullshit. You're actually claiming Reagan was a centrist? And that I am too? The first thing that needs to happen is that we need to strip the GOP of Power. They've been winning at top down class warfare for 40 years behind a screen of insincerity & divisive culture war issues. They have a radical right wing agenda to destroy the federal govt & are ideologically opposed to all the things Liberals & Progressives both want for America. The rest of us, including Biden, are actually reasonable people who really want the same things. We can work it out, but we have to win it all to do so. I'd say the same if my fellow Democrats had chosen Bernie or Liz or whoever. You're not helping. You already know that, of course, which leads me to question your sincerity entirely.

No, Reagan was a Neo-Liberal. Centrists at the time were more Left than they are today. However, todays Centrists are Reaganites/Neo-Liberals. It apparently needs pointed out that Biden has always been part of the Conservative wing of the Democratic Party. In fact, that is one of the reasons Obama chose him as VP, to allay peoples fears that he was too Liberal.

I'm sorry, is me pointing out the flaws of your Candidate inconvenient? Is that maybe because your Candidate is not that good?
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,182
5,646
146
No, Reagan was a Neo-Liberal. Centrists at the time were more Left than they are today. However, todays Centrists are Reaganites/Neo-Liberals. It apparently needs pointed out that Biden has always been part of the Conservative wing of the Democratic Party. In fact, that is one of the reasons Obama chose him as VP, to allay peoples fears that he was too Liberal.

I'm sorry, is me pointing out the flaws of your Candidate inconvenient? Is that maybe because your Candidate is not that good?

You really need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to realize you literally fucking said Reagan was a Centrist and then defined it as blatantly conservative. At some point even you need to recognize the simple misalignment of what you post.

Absolutely no clue where you think centrists at the time were more liberal either. What in the fuck? Where are you getting your information from? Right wingers might have been more liberal than the current strain of beligerant vitriol that they espouse, but Reagan sure as shit wasn't a centrist. Hell the neo-liberalism marker is a misnomer in that the "liberal" part is solely about their blatantly non-liberal economic policies that they just simply lied about being liberal in order to sell it to the centrists of the time. Which of course time has shown it was not only not liberal but was the start of blatantly fascist economic policies that they were actually wanting to enact (i.e. all the money to military, the rest have to beg or better yet just fucking die for the profits of corporate America as they steamroll average peoples' rights to enable it, which then fueled the need for the government to step in repeatedly to salvage their attempts to ruin the economy).

I do laugh that you start out calling people pointing out you're just saying both sides bullshit then immediately explicitly stated exactly that.

Again, you need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to be aware that you're just pissing in your own face.
 
Reactions: dank69

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
You really need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to realize you literally fucking said Reagan was a Centrist and then defined it as blatantly conservative. At some point even you need to recognize the simple misalignment of what you post.

Absolutely no clue where you think centrists at the time were more liberal either. What in the fuck? Where are you getting your information from? Right wingers might have been more liberal than the current strain of beligerant vitriol that they espouse, but Reagan sure as shit wasn't a centrist. Hell the neo-liberalism marker is a misnomer in that the "liberal" part is solely about their blatantly non-liberal economic policies that they just simply lied about being liberal in order to sell it to the centrists of the time. Which of course time has shown it was not only not liberal but was the start of blatantly fascist economic policies that they were actually wanting to enact (i.e. all the money to military, the rest have to beg or better yet just fucking die for the profits of corporate America as they steamroll average peoples' rights to enable it, which then fueled the need for the government to step in repeatedly to salvage their attempts to ruin the economy).

I do laugh that you start out calling people pointing out you're just saying both sides bullshit then immediately explicitly stated exactly that.

Again, you need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to be aware that you're just pissing in your own face.

Oh he’s aware of what he’s doing, trolls are always aware.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,131
5,658
126
You really need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to realize you literally fucking said Reagan was a Centrist and then defined it as blatantly conservative. At some point even you need to recognize the simple misalignment of what you post.

Absolutely no clue where you think centrists at the time were more liberal either. What in the fuck? Where are you getting your information from? Right wingers might have been more liberal than the current strain of beligerant vitriol that they espouse, but Reagan sure as shit wasn't a centrist. Hell the neo-liberalism marker is a misnomer in that the "liberal" part is solely about their blatantly non-liberal economic policies that they just simply lied about being liberal in order to sell it to the centrists of the time. Which of course time has shown it was not only not liberal but was the start of blatantly fascist economic policies that they were actually wanting to enact (i.e. all the money to military, the rest have to beg or better yet just fucking die for the profits of corporate America as they steamroll average peoples' rights to enable it, which then fueled the need for the government to step in repeatedly to salvage their attempts to ruin the economy).

I do laugh that you start out calling people pointing out you're just saying both sides bullshit then immediately explicitly stated exactly that.

Again, you need to actually read what you're posting because you don't seem to be aware that you're just pissing in your own face.

I am calling "Centrists" as aligned with Reagan, because they are. It is called the Overton Window. Everything has shifted Right since Reagan, including the Center.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,182
5,646
146
They don't have to buy or believe anything; it's all here in black and white. The problem is that there was never any argument to refute. Whenever you were asked for evidence you referred to the article, and when I asked you to vouch for its veracity you pitched a screaming fit. So there's nothing there. I agree, it's totally transparent, your nakedness for the world to see.

I don't care for the last word, it can be all yours, but if you're going to keep posting in this thread I hope you treat the truth with a little more respect.

You're literally demanding they do believe it. Do you understand what words mean? Because you sure don't seem to. If its there in black and white, you are literally claiming that its simple fact and that people should accept it. Do you listen to yourself? You claimed he stepped away from it but are also claiming he isn't. Which is it?

For fuck's sake dude, you've been literally yelling rape over and over and over and over. If that's not you pitching a screaming fit I don't know what to say. You're the forum equivalent of a rape whistle. And its been clear you don't actually give a shit about the woman that you are defining as the victim of this alleged rape. Hell you don't care about any aspect other than Biden even with regards to it.

It is transparent that you can't even keep your own bullshit remotely straight and seem to be struggling to even use phrases properly or understand what they mean. Sorry but you don't get to act like its clear but then claim there's nothing to even see. You're trying to argue there's not even an argument, while you claim someone both is and isn't pushing that argument, then demanding they accept your reality.

The truth is, its very obviously not even clear to you as demonstrated by your constant repeated nonsensical arguments that you literally just spent multiple pages arguing over then declaring there was never even an argument for you to be arguing against. That is simple objective fact that should be the baseline level for you to accept. I didn't even broach the veracity of any argument. You can't even admit that there was an argument that you were just part of, and then demanding everyone else accept your truth. Yet you can't even keep the simplest facets of discussion straight.

You haven't spent any time giving a reason to dismiss the discussion but you want it dismissed because you say so. While you demand that everyone accept that what you say is truth with you not backing that up in any way.

Nevermind the person you're constantly griping about has said it should be investigated but you don't even want that. You just want people to declare it was the worst rape in all of human history and therefore Bernie should be declared President. Meanwhile people are merely pointing out to you that what you want does not actually accomplish what you want, but you demand that people see it so. Just like you demanded that the Democrats fix the election for Bernie while damning them for supposedly fixing it against him.

Republicans ARE worse than Democrats, but Democrats are not the solution to this nations problems. The impeachment proved that to me, along with everything else Donald has gotten away with.
We need a real solution and its not making itself apparent at this time.

Let me get your logic straight. The Republicans are worse but only because of the Democrats! Therefore no Democrats? I bet that will sure teach the Republicans! I guess since you've spent decades refusing to hold the Republicans accountable you figure you might as well be the Democrats (as you see them) and try and hold them accountable for the Republicans by doing nothing?

The solution is for you to unfuck your brain. Its ok, I had to do it too. But until you do you'll keep enabling the problem that you can clearly see but are trying to pin on anyone but the people perpetrating it, and certainly trying to absolve yourself of any role in it (likely because you thought not voting was choosing to not have a role in it, or even worse you're trying to absolve yourself for having voted Republican - which I can basically guarantee you have based on your posts - until you finally were able to realize how truly awful they have been).

Which, I'm fine with not saying you're a Democrat. I don't consider myself one (or of any party). But you need to understand what actually will do something about the Republicans.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,685
126
You're literally demanding they do believe it. Do you understand what words mean? Because you sure don't seem to. If its there in black and white, you are literally claiming that its simple fact and that people should accept it. Do you listen to yourself? You claimed he stepped away from it but are also claiming he isn't. Which is it?

For fuck's sake dude, you've been literally yelling rape over and over and over and over. If that's not you pitching a screaming fit I don't know what to say. You're the forum equivalent of a rape whistle. And its been clear you don't actually give a shit about the woman that you are defining as the victim of this alleged rape. Hell you don't care about any aspect other than Biden even with regards to it.

It is transparent that you can't even keep your own bullshit remotely straight and seem to be struggling to even use phrases properly or understand what they mean. Sorry but you don't get to act like its clear but then claim there's nothing to even see. You're trying to argue there's not even an argument, while you claim someone both is and isn't pushing that argument, then demanding they accept your reality.

The truth is, its very obviously not even clear to you as demonstrated by your constant repeated nonsensical arguments that you literally just spent multiple pages arguing over then declaring there was never even an argument for you to be arguing against. That is simple objective fact that should be the baseline level for you to accept. I didn't even broach the veracity of any argument. You can't even admit that there was an argument that you were just part of, and then demanding everyone else accept your truth. Yet you can't even keep the simplest facets of discussion straight.

You haven't spent any time giving a reason to dismiss the discussion but you want it dismissed because you say so. While you demand that everyone accept that what you say is truth with you not backing that up in any way.

Nevermind the person you're constantly griping about has said it should be investigated but you don't even want that. You just want people to declare it was the worst rape in all of human history and therefore Bernie should be declared President. Meanwhile people are merely pointing out to you that what you want does not actually accomplish what you want, but you demand that people see it so. Just like you demanded that the Democrats fix the election for Bernie while damning them for supposedly fixing it against him.

I'm not demanding anything, quote the post where I demand anyone believe anything. He spent post after post flogging that article, that fucking hit piece from the Krassensteins, and then backed away from it the moment I challenged him on it. What a fucking fraud. Go ahead and go to bat for your guy, you're just as fucking clueless as he is.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,182
5,646
146
Oh he’s aware of what he’s doing, trolls are always aware.

While he's partaken in some trolling (so have I), I don't think that's the explanation for him simply not even being able to recognize him arguing with people then underlining what they said while seemingly believing he's completely refuting it and then trying to argue against it further by saying things that don't add up. Certainly this type of behavior is why I have almost completely ignored several posters that I've responded to in this thread. But that's merely to point out that they keep howling that people aren't taking them seriously when they can't even seem to take themselves seriously enough to actually manage the most basic aspect of discussion.
 
Reactions: dank69

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,131
5,658
126
Let's recap a few things:

1 Why now? An oft asked question of many Women when they make their Allegations public. She tried a year ago in support of another Woman alleging Sexual Impropriety, but was pushed aside by the organization that helped Dr Ford and has ties with the Biden Campaign, so.....

2 Did she make it up? If she did, she started making it up almost 30 years ago. Seems unlikely.

3 She claimed to tell others about it around the time it happened. The ones she mentioned that are still alive have confirmed it.

4 The Larry King Caller, her Mother or some Rando? Her Mother.

5 A neighbour also confirmed hearing about it, but was she a "Republican Operative". Apparently not as she supports Biden.

All 5 of these have been parts of arguments against her made by various Posters that have been Debunked or Clarified. Has the fact that these have been shown to not be suspicious points changed the Minds of anyone who made these arguments. If not, why not?

Other arguments Unrelated and Immaterial to the Allegation I have ignored, because they are typical Rape Apologist nonsense.

So the question has been asked, am I a Troll? Does a Troll refuse to compromise their Principles of not being willing to throw a Woman under the bus because she makes my Candidate weaker with her Allegations?

Am I a Russian paid by Vladimir with cases of Stolichnaya Elit? Am I a Script on some Server? A Republican Operative? Apparently, these days, it must surely be one of those 3 things, right?

Maybe I am just pissed off that many of you are willing to be fucking Cogs in a soulless machine you call a Political system that doesn't give a shit about any of you outside of recording your pointless Votes.

I understand that Reade is a big problem, just as Bidens' Cognitive Issues are. However, if you want the Moral High ground it would be best that you just pretend these issues didn't exist rather than continue embarrassing yourselves at every opportunity for this previously rejected shitty Candidate.

Sorry.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
You're literally demanding they do believe it. Do you understand what words mean? Because you sure don't seem to. If its there in black and white, you are literally claiming that its simple fact and that people should accept it. Do you listen to yourself? You claimed he stepped away from it but are also claiming he isn't. Which is it?

For fuck's sake dude, you've been literally yelling rape over and over and over and over. If that's not you pitching a screaming fit I don't know what to say. You're the forum equivalent of a rape whistle. And its been clear you don't actually give a shit about the woman that you are defining as the victim of this alleged rape. Hell you don't care about any aspect other than Biden even with regards to it.

It is transparent that you can't even keep your own bullshit remotely straight and seem to be struggling to even use phrases properly or understand what they mean. Sorry but you don't get to act like its clear but then claim there's nothing to even see. You're trying to argue there's not even an argument, while you claim someone both is and isn't pushing that argument, then demanding they accept your reality.

The truth is, its very obviously not even clear to you as demonstrated by your constant repeated nonsensical arguments that you literally just spent multiple pages arguing over then declaring there was never even an argument for you to be arguing against. That is simple objective fact that should be the baseline level for you to accept. I didn't even broach the veracity of any argument. You can't even admit that there was an argument that you were just part of, and then demanding everyone else accept your truth. Yet you can't even keep the simplest facets of discussion straight.

You haven't spent any time giving a reason to dismiss the discussion but you want it dismissed because you say so. While you demand that everyone accept that what you say is truth with you not backing that up in any way.

Nevermind the person you're constantly griping about has said it should be investigated but you don't even want that. You just want people to declare it was the worst rape in all of human history and therefore Bernie should be declared President. Meanwhile people are merely pointing out to you that what you want does not actually accomplish what you want, but you demand that people see it so. Just like you demanded that the Democrats fix the election for Bernie while damning them for supposedly fixing it against him.



Let me get your logic straight. The Republicans are worse but only because of the Democrats! Therefore no Democrats? I bet that will sure teach the Republicans! I guess since you've spent decades refusing to hold the Republicans accountable you figure you might as well be the Democrats (as you see them) and try and hold them accountable for the Republicans by doing nothing?

The solution is for you to unfuck your brain. Its ok, I had to do it too. But until you do you'll keep enabling the problem that you can clearly see but are trying to pin on anyone but the people perpetrating it, and certainly trying to absolve yourself of any role in it (likely because you thought not voting was choosing to not have a role in it, or even worse you're trying to absolve yourself for having voted Republican - which I can basically guarantee you have based on your posts - until you finally were able to realize how truly awful they have been).

Which, I'm fine with not saying you're a Democrat. I don't consider myself one (or of any party). But you need to understand what actually will do something about the Republicans.
You did not get it straight.
You got it all wrong.
Because you can't think.
You'd rather assume you know everything and then spout off nonsense based from that.
You should be working for the White House with your logic.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,298
8,212
136
Hell the neo-liberalism marker is a misnomer in that the "liberal" part is solely about their blatantly non-liberal economic policies that they just simply lied about being liberal in order to sell it to the centrists of the time. Which of course time has shown it was not only not liberal but was the start of blatantly fascist economic policies that they were actually wanting to enact (i.e. all the money to military, the rest have to beg or better yet just fucking die for the profits of corporate America as they steamroll average peoples' rights to enable it, which then fueled the need for the government to step in repeatedly to salvage their attempts to ruin the economy).

That's not true, that's invented history on your part.

Liberalism was always the philosophy of individualism, and was very much the belief system of the capitalist classes, as opposed to the land-owning gentry on the one hand and the working-class on the other.

Neo-liberalism is correctly named, it's a resurgence and reassertion of the free-market, minimalist-state, capitalist outlook, which always has been a strand of liberalism. It's always been part of that tradition.

Neo-liberaiism is a movement that started with Friedman, Hayek, Mises, Buchanon, and the rest, who thought that by separating 'the market' from political control, and 'rolling back the state' they could preserve their particular (rather questionable) idea of 'freedom', after the horrors of the overreach of the state in the 1930s. But it was still clearly in the liberal tradition. Indeed in most countries the "Liberal Party" is the party that was always the most pro-capitalism, and which duly embraced neo-liberalism. The Liberal Democrats here have always had a strong strand of pro-free-market neo-libealism aka 'the Orange bookers'. Tories favoured the royals and the aristocracy and following tradition, Labour were (supposedly) socialist, and Liberals were in favour of the free market.

It's a nonsense to say the neo-libs "lied about being liberal in order to sell it to the centrist of the time", that bears no relationship to what happened, historically.

The neo-libs didn't 'sell it to the centrists' under some sort of false-pretences. The centrists happily embraced neo-liberalism, because 'centrists' represent those who do pretty well under capitalism and don't want radical change. When capitalism was going well and had the wealth to spare, those centrists might have embraced a bit of welfare-liberalism and benignantly offered something to those not doing so well under the existing system, but as soon as things get difficult they embraced neo-liberalism.

Not because they were 'tricked' by the cunning use of the name (which was only really coined retrospectively anyway) but because it suited their interests.


It's true that while neo-liberalism was originally supposed to be a way of preserving a certain notion of 'freedom' against the twin threats of fascism and communism, in reality both those things faded from the scene anyway, and the neo-libs instead turned on social-democracy and the welfare state. That may have been the intention all along, but in any case in doing so they seem to have just bought the very spectres they were supposedly trying to avert, back to life again. I just don't agree though that 'centrists' were 'sold' neo-liberalism, still less that the name had anything to do with it (the name only really became widely used long after the neo-liberals had taken power in the form of Thatcher and Reagan). The centrists, i.e. the likes of Clinton and Blair and the Lib Dems, quite happily embraced neo-liberalism, because it didn't clash with their personal self-interests.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: jman19
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |