The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

[soundforbjt]

Wait, so you went in and engaged with the content of the EDITORIAL PIECE? Is that what you're saying? That even though it's an EDITORIAL it can contain valuable information?

No, I clicked on the link to the poll and got results from there.

edit: the poll being from a reputable source and not YouTube.

 

[dank69]

I would gladly vote for Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, Yang or Gabbard. You guys chose to nominate mediocrity and hypocrisy...again.

Oh yes. I totally believe you.

 

[shortylickens]

No, I clicked on the link to the poll and got results from there.

edit: the poll being from a reputable source and not YouTube.

Well,unless the staff at youtube is reporting the news (which I dont think they are) then youtube does not qualify as a reputable nor disreputable source.
they simply host videos.
also they sponsor some fictional content, like Cobra Kai.

 

[Jhhnn]

Maybe Biden can use it as a way to lure Trump voters-

https://scontent.fcae1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/96085995_10222292196230465_9049889052114812928_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=110474&_nc_ohc=KyMngFpEzS8AX-fUGq0&_nc_ht=scontent.fcae1-1.fna&oh=e00e6e8b49a826b6470c84dea9fbab31&oe=5ED8E796

 

[Caminetto]

A couple of twists today:
Reade is being represented by a prominent lawyer and political donor to President Donald Trump’s 2016 Republican campaign.
And Reade wants Biden to quit the race.
LOL.

 

[soundforbjt]

A couple of twists today:
Reade is being represented by a prominent lawyer and political donor to President Donald Trump’s 2016 Republican campaign.
And Reade wants Biden to quit the race.
LOL.

That proves she's probably lying...getting in bed with Trump. Don't get any lower than that.

 

[hal2kilo]

A couple of twists today:
Reade is being represented by a prominent lawyer and political donor to President Donald Trump’s 2016 Republican campaign.
And Reade wants Biden to quit the race.
LOL.

This just get better all the time.

 

[Jhhnn]

This just get better all the time.

But wait! There's more!

Tara Reade offers to testify under oath and take polygraph test if Biden does

Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, offered to testify under oath and take a polygraph test so long as the former vice president does so as well.In a…

thehill.com

 

[pcgeek11]

But wait! There's more!

Tara Reade offers to testify under oath and take polygraph test if Biden does

Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, offered to testify under oath and take a polygraph test so long as the former vice president does so as well.In a…

thehill.com

What do you think the odds are for Biden to take a polygraph test over this?

I say Zero Chance.

A polygraph isn't worth two poops anyway.

 

[Atreus21]

Oh yes. I totally believe you.

If it means anything, he's telling the truth.

 

[UberNeuman]

If it means anything, he's telling the truth.

lol. What you boys don't seem to get is that not one of you has any credibility.

Dishonesty and lies catch up with you on a long enough timeline.

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

Umm, guys?

 

[woolfe9998]

But wait! There's more!

Tara Reade offers to testify under oath and take polygraph test if Biden does

Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, offered to testify under oath and take a polygraph test so long as the former vice president does so as well.In a…

thehill.com

It's a clever strategy, likely suggested by her lawyer (i.e. her GOP handler). If Biden refuses, which he should, it looks like he's hiding something. He can't agree to it. Polygraphs are total bunk, meaning the test could just as easily identify him as lying regardless, and that result would be more politically damaging than refusing to take the test.

 

[UberNeuman]

Umm, guys?

View attachment 20736

I'm sure the gullible Twins/bad actors and their concern pals will be on this shortly. lol.

 

[pcgeek11]

I agree. It would be not in his best interest to take a lie detector test regardless of his innocence or guilt.

 

[sandorski]

But wait! There's more!

Tara Reade offers to testify under oath and take polygraph test if Biden does

Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, offered to testify under oath and take a polygraph test so long as the former vice president does so as well.In a…

thehill.com

In this very thread her not doing these things was suggested as proof she was lying and a fake. Again, it seems like no matter what she does it's used against her.

 

[Fenixgoon]

In this very thread her not doing these things was suggested as proof she was lying and a fake. Again, it seems like no matter what she does it's used against her.

biden testifying under oath or polygraphing is irrelevant irrelevant to the truth.

edit: if what she's saying is truthful, then it shouldn't matter what biden does or doesn't say.

by placing a contingency on her own testimony, that decreases her credibility because it creates the appearance - real or not - that it is all simply a ploy.

 

[woolfe9998]

I have no issue with the suggestion that they both testify. The polygraph thing is, however, a stunt. It's time we stopped even talking about polygraphs. They're the longest running scam in US history.

 

[sandorski]

Umm, guys?

View attachment 20736

This article claims a different Lawyer, Douglas Wigdor. edit - I see that Moran is also working on the case.

excerpt

Wigdor is well known for his work on prominent cases related to sexual harassment and assault. He represented six women who accused Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced Hollywood producer, of sexual misconduct. He has also represented a number of Fox News employees in cases alleging gender and racial discrimination at the network, including Juliette Huddy, one of the women who accused Bill O’Reilly of pursuing a sexual relationship with her and retaliating when she refused. In 2018, he spoke out in the media defending Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

 

[darkswordsman17]

It's a clever strategy, likely suggested by her lawyer (i.e. her GOP handler). If Biden refuses, which he should, it looks like he's hiding something. He can't agree to it. Polygraphs are total bunk, meaning the test could just as easily identify him as lying regardless, and that result would be more politically damaging than refusing to take the test.

Eh, Biden can just say he'll gladly do it if Turmp does.

 

[sandorski]

biden testifying under oath or polygraphing is irrelevant irrelevant to the truth.

edit: if what she's saying is truthful, then it shouldn't matter what biden does or doesn't say.

by placing a contingency on her own testimony, that decreases her credibility because it creates the appearance - real or not - that it is all simply a ploy.

We were discussing Her doing it. At least what I was responding was about Her, not Biden.

 

[woolfe9998]

Eh, Biden can just say he'll gladly do it if Turmp does.

You're missing the point, which is that polygraphs don't actually work. Which means if Biden and Trump both take one, Trump could just as easily come out more "truthful." Do you really think Trump's vitals change when he lies? With him I doubt there is any physiological difference between lying and telling the truth since it isn't even clear that he always knows the difference.

Polygraphs are inadmissible in courts of law, but admissible in the court of public opinion. Which is why it's a dangerous gamble for any politician to take one.

 

[darkswordsman17]

You're missing the point, which is that polygraphs don't actually work. Which means if Biden and Trump both take one, Trump could just as easily come out more "truthful." Do you really think Trump's vitals change when he lies? With him I doubt there is any physiological difference between lying and telling the truth since it isn't even clear that he always knows the difference.

Polygraphs are inadmissible in courts of law, but admissible in the court of public opinion. Which is why it's a dangerous gamble for any politician to take one.

How am I missing the point? I'd say you are more than I am. I don't give a flying fuck about polygraphs and I'm almost 100% certain you liked a post of mine recently where I explicitly said polygraphs are the junkiest of junk science used in forensics. You use that to dupe Turmp into answering questions under oath, which will roast his ass because he can't go 2 seconds without lying.

I also have a hunch that Turmp puts a lot of stock into polygraphs and would be quite nervous about taking one himself and considering he also can't seem to go more than a few seconds, let alone when being asked questions like if he raped someone, he'd have a very goddamn hard time keeping from getting agitated. He can't respond with simple yes or no, so the moment you start getting "no, she's ugly, I never even met her" followed by a pic of him meeting would be pretty goddamned damning and would show polygraphs don't mean jack fucking shit, so it would undermine using them in the first place.

 

[woolfe9998]

How am I missing the point? I'd say you are more than I am. I don't give a flying fuck about polygraphs and I'm almost 100% certain you liked a post of mine recently where I explicitly said polygraphs are the junkiest of junk science used in forensics. You use that to dupe Turmp into answering questions under oath, which will roast his ass because he can't go 2 seconds without lying.

I also have a hunch that Turmp puts a lot of stock into polygraphs and would be quite nervous about taking one himself and considering he also can't seem to go more than a few seconds, let alone when being asked questions like if he raped someone, he'd have a very goddamn hard time keeping from getting agitated. He can't respond with simple yes or no, so the moment you start getting "no, she's ugly, I never even met her" followed by a pic of him meeting would be pretty goddamned damning and would show polygraphs don't mean jack fucking shit, so it would undermine using them in the first place.

Sure, but many people do not know that polygraphs are bunk. Perception matters in an election. The truth is, I have no idea how Trump would do because as we both know, polygraph results are like throwing darts at a board. That is too much of a gamble given that not everyone understands how little value the results have. Which is why polygraph results are kept away from juries, because they often don't understand this. Voters are no better.

 

[qliveur]

I have no issue with the suggestion that they both testify. The polygraph thing is, however, a stunt. It's time we stopped even talking about polygraphs. They're the longest running scam in US history.

It's analogous to the E-Meter.