An event totally different than her allegation of sexual assault.
Again, is your argument that she told her neighbor but hid it from her husband? If not, that's the nail in the coffin.
I missed this earlier, but her Ex didn't just say she told him something. He said, "It was obvious that this event had a very traumatic effect on Petitioner, and that she is still sensitive and effected by it today."
Something happened and it left a noticeable mark on her.
I have no issue with the suggestion that they both testify. The polygraph thing is, however, a stunt. It's time we stopped even talking about polygraphs. They're the longest running scam in US history.
An event totally different than her allegation of sexual assault.
Again, is your argument that she told her neighbor but hid it from her husband? If not, that's the nail in the coffin.
Nothing. It is understood why you're pushing this bullshit. In the last 6 weeks more than 20 million Americans have lost their jobs under Trump's leadership, and you're desperate to make sure people aren't talking about that.Oh, we do do we? That Lawyer also supported Democrats, now what?
No, it's not. It shows that she trusted her neighbour, a Woman who also was going through something at the time, more than her Husband. That's all.
Many have grabbed on to every piece of minutia since the beginning. When one fell as a reason, they grabbed onto another, when that fell, another. At some point one needs to see the pattern and the problem with it.
Nothing. It is understood why you're pushing this bullshit. In the last 6 weeks more than 20 million Americans have lost their jobs under Trump's leadership, and you're desperate to make sure people aren't talking about that.
Useful idiots are useful.Ah yes, I'm just getting Trump re-elected...
So to be clear your argument is now that she told her husband about sexual harassment but didn't tell him about sexual assault and that's the reason why the only documented evidence of what she told people back then is at odds with her current story?
No, he said specifically what happened and it wasn't sexual assault.Her husband knew something happened and noted that it had a lasting affect on her.
You are the one fixated on whether her Neighbour knew more than her Husband. There are reasons why a Wife may not divulge all things to a Husband, if that is the case.
Lol how has any of our points against Reade been disproven?
No, he said specifically what happened and it wasn't sexual assault.
He said something that is contrary to her current accounting of events so it's important to know why that i
He said what she told him. Like often is the case, she did not divulge all details.
Ah yes, so it just so happens that the only written, relatively contemporaneous account doesn't include her central allegation because she was telling her neighbors but not her husband.
The things people will believe with motivated reasoning...
Ah yes, so it just so happens that the only written, relatively contemporaneous account doesn't include her central allegation because she was telling her neighbors but not her husband.
The things people will believe with motivated reasoning...
This one piece of evidence is far more corroboration than Dr Ford ever had. It also happens to be not the only piece, but is 1 of 7ish so far. I'm also going to point out that 1 week ago this Allegation was pronounced Dead and Over. Yet here we are with yet even more Evidence. How much more do you think will turn up soon?
Something happened at that Work place, don't be surprised if something substantial comes to light about it.
So yes, Motivate Reasoning seems alive and well. Who is using it though?
This one piece of evidence is far more corroboration than Dr Ford ever had. It also happens to be not the only piece, but is 1 of 7ish so far. I'm also going to point out that 1 week ago this Allegation was pronounced Dead and Over. Yet here we are with yet even more Evidence. How much more do you think will turn up soon?
Something happened at that Work place, don't be surprised if something substantial comes to light about it.
So yes, Motivate Reasoning seems alive and well. Who is using it though?
And remember, even that much is disputed by every other person at the workplace. Her entire source of evidence for her claim is she told a bunch of people something happened. That's it.Yes, maybe something happened at the workplace, but it probably wasn't a sexual assault.