ftfyLol it’s only alive because she/Fox News/Trump's campaign refuses to let it die. Not because she’s demanding justice. She’s ambulance chasing for fame.
And remember, even that much is disputed by every other person at the workplace. Her entire source of evidence for her claim is she told a bunch of people something happened. That's it.
It doesn't mean it didn't happen, but pretending that because she told 7 people instead of 6 that's suddenly more evidence is kind of pointless, it's the same evidence.
Not true at all. Interns noted something odd.
Dr Ford's entire source of Evidence was that she told her Therapist 30 years later.
Yet another point of Corroboration is yet another point of Corroboration. It does bolster her allegation, especially since so many tried to dismiss every other point as unreliable or even fabricated. How much more do you need? There are numerous People who have come forward, there is a Phone Call, now a Written Court Document all pointing to something significant happening and all near the time when she alleges the event took place.
Now it's 'something happened'. Literally zero evidence of any sexual assault outside her claims, which are constantly changing. Now we see that her own husband at the time didn't know anything about her claim that she was assaulted.
Nope.If it occurred, do you think it is even possible to Prove it?
Nope.
Kanavaugh got the job didn't he?In light of that, was there any way to ever Prove Dr Ford's allegation against Kavenaugh?
Yes, maybe something happened at the workplace, but it probably wasn't a sexual assault.
Is it possible that Biden's office learned that charges of fraud were brought against her August 2, 1993 and forced her to resign by the end of the week instead of firing her? Would it make sense that she'd lie to her friends and family about the circumstances of her separation from Biden's staff?
Lol it’s only alive because she refuses to let it die. Not because she’s demanding justice. She’s ambulance chasing for fame.
I suspect, that she experienced some sort of harassment in the early 90s that was "no big deal" back then such as her claim that she was asked to serve drinks at a party or overheard that Biden thought she was pretty and had a nice ass - touched her neck or something to the effect. I suspect that she was sincerely bothered by it and complained. She didn't get any traction on it and that was the basis of her leaving the job (other than she was fired) and her mother's call to which had no mention of assault, just "had issues" and the intake form that doesn't mention harassment or assault, just feeling "uncomfortable" and the court document saying she experienced harassment in Biden's office. I suspect that, when no one especially cared, she upped the ante with the exaggerated assault story which is why none of the documents are about assault, his vetting didn't turn up any allegations of assault, there was no Congressional follow-up while assault was a hot topic, no one else has claimed assault and the only "evidence" comes from her telling people about it months or years after it supposedly occurred.
What's Occam's razor suggest? A person with a documented history of deceit is being deceptive, or one of most highly regarded senators of our lifetimes perpetrated a sexual assault that only came to light in the year he is running for election to POTUS from a outspoken Putin-lover who retains a lawyer paid by Russia amid public alarms from the intelligence community that Russia is actively meddling in the election?If so, something or someone within the office should know of it.
Oops.Is it possible that Biden's office learned that charges of fraud were brought against her August 2, 1993 and forced her to resign by the end of the week instead of firing her? Would it make sense that she'd lie to her friends and family about the circumstances of her separation from Biden's staff?
But but 7 witnessesA person with a documented history of deceit is being deceptive
It may now be dawning on them that ‘but the person indicted for fraud told some people some things’ might not be the best evidence.But but 7 witnesses
One of Tara Reade's new attorneys donated $55,000 to Trump in 2016. The other is a former writer and editor for a Russian propaganda network.
What's Occam's razor suggest? A person with a documented history of deceit is being deceptive, or one of most highly regarded senators of our lifetimes perpetrated a sexual assault that only came to light in the year he is running for election to POTUS from a outspoken Putin-lover who retains a lawyer paid by Russia amid public alarms from the intelligence community that Russia is actively meddling in the election?
Yet more corroboration.
This is another person confirming Reade’s account that was also formally documented. Maybe she only recently felt comfortable revealing the extent of the problem. Reade is also willing to go under oath. You’re running out of field.
What of them?If you want to use that, what of Biden's history of Lies and odd behaviour with Women?
What would you do if your employer went public with the circumstances of your separation, where that information might influence your future employment opportunities negatively? I don't know what the policies are at your place of work, but my human resources department is basically only allowed to disclose date of hire, date of separation, and I *think* whether or not the person is eligible for rehire.Again though, if she was Fired/Let go due to Fraud, don't you think there would be a Paper Trail?
The allegations are credible. Hard to claim the morale high ground with a morally compromised candidate.Yet again you argue that having standards and failing to meet them (even when the accusation of failure is clearly non-credible and monetized) is worse than having no standards at all.
This must be why you're working so hard to ensure that the pussygrabbing champion of those with no standards gets re-elected.
You haven’t disproved anything.It’s kind of weird that when evidence comes out that works to disprove your claim you try and pretend it does the opposite. Are you just trying to convince yourself so you can keep #bothsidesing?