I mean she originally claimed a formal complaint existed but has since changed her story and said no such complaint exists and that even the ‘intake form’ she filled out doesn’t include any accusations of assault.Both are job interviews, the hiring managers are simply different. The Democrats managed to invent a tribunal standard to politically weaponize #metoo. Now, Democrats down ballet can hypocritically rationalize why they are not holding Biden to the standard even he advocated.
It’s not surprising that Democrats are attacking the character of the accuser. Standard play.
I hope for your sake a formal complaint doesn’t surface. The “exhaustive” vetting of Biden already overlooked one document.
She has stated political goal, him dropping out.
Both are job interviews, the hiring managers are simply different. The Democrats managed to invent a tribunal standard to politically weaponize #metoo. Now, Democrats down ballet can hypocritically rationalize why they are not holding Biden to the standard even he advocated.
It’s not surprising that Democrats are attacking the character of the accuser. Standard play.
I hope for your sake a formal complaint doesn’t surface. The “exhaustive” vetting of Biden already overlooked one document.
Dr. Ford came forward for that reason.
Why do you think she was there?
Yeh, let's talk about so-called liberal hypocrisy rather than the veracity of the accusations. That's whataboutism, and has been all along.
I asked you a question, you could try answering it without asking another question.
I don't know what to tell you. Everyone else knows why she was there.
You see, we can provide links to where Tara has called for Biden to resign/dropout, you can’t do the same food ford and instead have to assume you know why she came forward. That’s called motivated reasoning and you and your band of useful idiots have been doing that the whole time.
People who engage in fraud can also get sexually assaulted or harassed. If she was dismissed on ethical grounds, I am sure Biden’s office can provide ample documentation to back it.Also Reade’s attorney has confirmed that the check fraud charges are real.
She has...some explaining to do.
No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.People who engage in fraud can also get sexually assaulted or harassed. If she was dismissed on ethical grounds, I am sure Biden’s office can provide ample documentation to back it.
And the whataboutism double down.Nah, the Hypocrisy is in how some have chosen to address the Accusations. It's blatant and it's telling.
No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.
Regardless, the timing sure is interesting, as is the continuing pattern of deception by Reade.
Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.
Regardless, the timing sure is interesting, as is the continuing pattern of deception by Reade.
I can’t link you to common sense. Kavanaugh held a number of prominent government positions, and was floated on a few short lists as under consideration for SCOTUS. The accusations only surfaced after he received the nomination. People are questioning why Reade has chosen to come forward now. That same reasoning applies to Dr. Ford.I’ll take a link for that claim.
And the whataboutism double down.
The timing of when Reade was charged with a crime is a problem for her, not Biden, haha.Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.
The timing is inconvenient for Biden. That is not Reade’s problem.
No but it is Reades problem that she has made this political......you can`t have it both ways......Reade herself made it political.....Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.
The timing is inconvenient for Biden. That is not Reade’s problem.
Hogwash. Her stealth edit of her Medium piece is an attempt to deceive. Plain as day. The rest shows it's a pattern of deviant behavior.It is all part of the same issue. If talking about the hypocrisy between how the same people have dealt with Ford and Reade is "whataboutism", then so is talking about Reade's various life events and her Sexual Assault allegation. You can't have it both ways.
I can’t link you to common sense. Kavanaugh held a number of prominent government positions, and was floated on a few short lists as under consideration for SCOTUS. The accusations only surfaced after he received the nomination. People are questioning why Reade has chosen to come forward now. That same reasoning applies to Dr. Ford.
Hogwash. Her stealth edit of her Medium piece is an attempt to deceive. Plain as day. The rest shows it's a pattern of deviant behavior.
What part of the Edits was an attempt to deceive?
What parts do you think would qualify as that?
We can answer with questions as well.