Cerpin Taxt
Lifer
- Feb 23, 2005
- 11,943
- 542
- 126
That's because the "basic cell" does not appear to be created or designed. Your ignorance and incredulity of evolution is not evidence that it is untrue.Yet, that theory still didn't figure out who did create and design that basic cell though.
Nothing in science is 100% certain. Having said that, evolution is as certain as ANYTHING else in science. More certain than gravity, in fact.Of course you don't actually believe that the Evolution theory is such a 100%-certain...
The evidence is conclusive in that it satisfies all reasonable doubts....conclusive...
It really isn't debatable, anymore. There is only ignorance....undebatable...
I don't know what "hard-proofed-evidence" is, but it is backed by rigorous evidence, to be sure....and backed by hard-proofed-evidence.
Yes, they have. It's called the Modern Synthesis.I mean, those scientists doesn't looks like they've settled down yet on a complete framework for their scientific theory.
Evolution will be investigated and studied as long as there are humans, and likely longer. This does not increase the likelihood that evolution will be falsified, nor does it indicate that there is any doubt about the basic premises of evolutionary theory.The case is still under study and we would witness a new changes/updates for a long time to come.
BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY EVIDENCE.That said, why would you completely ignore any argument or statement from those religious freaks and their ancient, probably forged, sacred books. Isn't it a debatable subject? why can't you give the slightest consideration for any of their heresy.
Strawman.Sorry, I've taken a glance, and that theory can't answer my argument over why our inside organs/systems has had to be that complicated.
So your opinion is that human biology does not appear to be designed by an intelligent agent, then.A much simpler systems might have done it so well, one way or another.
You're just arguing from your own incredulity. "I can't imagine how this could've happened without a magical god, so therefore there must be a magical god."Well, take a look over that sensation of orgasm for instance, I believe half of it would be enough to continue the sexual reproduction process between all the living kinds.
How about our ages, who did set the reliability standard of our hearts.
Take a very thoughtful look into each and every system, then at least you may have understanding about my believe that the human was created as a human; a perfection compared to all other living species, especially when it comes to his brain.
Your argument says more about your own ignorance than it does any putative deity.
Evolution does not predict that all organisms will develop identical eyes. In fact it rather predicts that they will develop eyes suited to their environments, and guess what we observe?If our eyes had developed from a very primitive state (like realibrad already pointed out) then why it didn't happen to all, since basically the very original livings went through almost the same circumstances. Yet, and after billions of years, we still can find some creatures with a similar primitive design that had long existed since the very beginning of life.
You are invited to frame the idea of intelligent design in a way that is accessible to the scientific method. To date, nobody has ever done that.Can't our scientists abandon their bias for once, and give a slight hint about the possibility of an intentional design for those living creatures.
...believe in what?Of course not, as then they'd have no choice but to believe in the God.