jackstar7
Lifer
- Jun 26, 2009
- 11,679
- 1,944
- 126
When someone ends up shot, the person who brings the gun has some responsibility, yes.
The wrong way? No thanks. If someone with a gun is following me I'm running away and looking to avoid a fight at (almost) all costs. Even if I am armed as well. Fighting is a last resort when there are no other alternatives available to avoid harm.Cool. Now look at it the other way.
Man, you like to twist things. Yes, in a self-defense situation the person who killed the attacker is responsible for pulling the trigger and ending the attackers life. That's not the same thing as being at fault, but I suspect you already know that and are allowing your anti-gun bias to stop you from admitting it.When someone ends up shot, the person who brings the gun has some responsibility, yes.
The wrong way? No thanks. If someone with a gun is following me I'm running away and looking to avoid a fight at (almost) all costs. Even if I am armed as well. Fighting is a last resort when there are no other alternatives available to avoid harm.
EDIT: My reason is that I don't feel I should have to let someone else attack me because you don't like guns or overvalue the life of violent criminals vs the people they victimize.
My perfect world ends up with fewer dead people. Nowhere do I suggest some magic sense of community and love takes over.Man, you like to twist things. Yes, in a self-defense situation the person who killed the attacker is responsible for pulling the trigger and ending the attackers life. That's not the same thing as being at fault, but I suspect you already know that and are allowing your anti-gun bias to stop you from admitting it.
I've got news for you: in your perfect world without guns it does nothing to ensure folks suddenly love one another and play nice. Attack someone who is armed and pay the price, I say.
Hopefully this scenario made people re-think some of their biased positions.None of this has anything to do with the OP, it was a diversion.
Nah. It appears they were complicit in the scam. A crucial part of it actually.Well, at least Americans are scamming Nigerians for a change.
Yeah, I totally trust the CPD now.Hopefully this scenario made people re-think some of their biased positions.
Was just a joke.Nah. It appears they were complicit in the scam. A crucial part of it actually.
Yeah, but there wasn't really a role reversal joke here. Nigerian scammers be scamming...Was just a joke.
Dozens of hospital workers fired for prying into Smollett's medical records.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebr...ecords-sources-say/ar-BBUtkZw?ocid=spartanntp
Stupid fucks. Just because someone is a celebrity who is embroiled in a public controversy doesn't mean it's OK to look at their private medical records.
Scrolled past. In a list.Some said they just "walked passed" his records, which I didn't really understand what they meant.
Scrolled past. In a list.
I’m not buying it. Every hospital has (should have) secure online med records and it tracks everything you do. A glass barrier and to access it you have to break the glass is how I’ve heard it described, maybe somebody on here in the med field can fill in a bit more details. Not buying they just scrolled past.
Indicted on 16 Felonies.
I hope that is enough to put him in the slammer for a few years, but something tells me it's just wishful thinking.
https://abc13.com/5177586/?fbclid=IwAR1-zby5elloiKmLi3VxgtjiOekFKmcX0WEs3-fA-D8WbDIkWEZ8rc1eARI
Rats. Beat me by 4 minutes.
From the article:
"Now the grand jury has returned 16 felony counts of disorderly conduct for filing a false police report."
I’m not buying it. Every hospital has (should have) secure online med records and it tracks everything you do. A glass barrier and to access it you have to break the glass is how I’ve heard it described, maybe somebody on here in the med field can fill in a bit more details. Not buying they just scrolled past.