monstercameron
Diamond Member
- Feb 12, 2013
- 3,818
- 1
- 0
some power numbers just in http://foro.noticias3d.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=421821&p=5036332&viewfull=1#post5036332
seem impressive
seem impressive
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/20I already posted that Anand measured thoses chips at 83W or so ,
not exactly what one would call mobile.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/20
Anand praises the power consumption.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/20
Anand praises the power consumption.
some power numbers just in http://foro.noticias3d.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=421821&p=5036332&viewfull=1#post5036332
seem impressive
Nice numbers , encoding show a decent CPU efficency
improvement , moreover when we know that it has 20%
better IPC in this very task.
We have seen no power graph associated with ocl benches,
that s just arguments pulled out of thin air , indeed that is
i5 when looking at ocl and i3 when looking at the prices curves...
I already posted that Anand measured thoses chips at 83W or so ,
not exactly what one would call mobile.
the OC numbers are a little troubling, that is a large rise for such a small OC.
I'm sorry your just making a fool out of yourself. What exactly are you pointing out? It seems to me your compare power consumption to thermal dissipation? The Iris 5200 Pro might draw 85 power, but that doesn't mean is dissipating that much heat. You're trying to tell me the 15" rMBP is not a mobile?
2M/4T always competed against dualcore Intels. 1M/2T is born hopeless. 1 FPU etc.
Dualcores with Hyperthreading exactly, means the i3. Dont try again comparing the 4 threaded APUs to Intels low level Celerons and Pentium, it fails.
Excellent :thumbsup:
some power numbers just in http://foro.noticias3d.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=421821&p=5036332&viewfull=1#post5036332
seem impressive
it has me questioning beema/mullins on glofo or tsmc?
Using Newegg prices are a comparison for pre-built desktops:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...el%20Core%20i3 (Core i3 starts @ $399)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...8-Series%20APU (A8-6500 APU starts @ $479)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...0-Series%20APU (A10-6700 APU starts @ $499)
Using the Current Fry's sale for Pre-builts here is what I am coming up with:
http://www.frys-electronics-ads.com...-PC-with-4th-Gen-Intel-Core-i3-4130-Processor (Core i3 for $348)
http://www.frys-electronics-ads.com...80-UR22-Desktop-PC-with-AMD-A8-6500-Processor (A8-6500 for $448)
Now granted the Core i3 systems come with 4GB RAM vs. 8GB for the AMD systems, but that still a pretty big disparity in pricing IMO.
simple so add the cost for 4gb more ram and a dgpu that can outperform [richland]kaveri...
I'm sorry your just making a fool out of yourself. What exactly are you pointing out? It seems to me your compare power consumption to thermal dissipation? The Iris 5200 Pro might draw 85 power, but that doesn't mean is dissipating that much heat. You're trying to tell me the 15" rMBP is not a mobile?
I actually wonder if the $348 Core i3-4130 desktop beats the $448 A8-6500 desktop in some gaming scenarios.....with no added discrete video card....and with 4GB RAM. (re: The A8-6500 quad core is only clocked 3.5 Ghz with 4.1 Ghz turbo and the iGPU has only 256 stream processors).
P.S. I made a mistake on the Newegg pricing for Core i3. It actually starts at $409.99 (The $399.99 desktop had a Core i3-3220T T processor in it)
If AMD had anything worth praise, he'd probably give it to them as well.Anand praises anything intel your point?
The only ones that pop out as bottlenecks are Crysis Warhead and Saints Row IV. We looking at the same graph?
On Hitman that s 53% more TDP for 23% more frequency ,
he had to increase voltage by just 12% to reach this TDP number.
Edit : the gpu is also ocked , by 38% so the numbers
as well as GF process are not bad at all.