- Aug 22, 2001
- 28,827
- 21,619
- 146
One addendum I'd suggest adding to the FAQs is that some boards such as my Shuttle AN50R offer a voltage range that goes below 1v so the CG B2 35W Mobile's default 1.2v should not be an issue for some boards.
Originally posted by: oralpain
My motherboard has been able to do 420x5 with clockgen totaly stable. Just needed to lower HTT to x1, and memory to ddr200. Definatly noth the fastest setting but it proves PCI/AGP lock beyond a doubt.
You can't run the memory 1:1 with an athlon 64 anyway, it's divided down from the cpu speed. I sold my pc3200 bh-5 and made more than enough money to get some decent pc4000. My baord only goes to 2.85vdimm wich was only enough for me to get my bh-5 to around 210-215MHz. Running the memory with slightly worse timings, but with 25% more MHz should give me a small performance increase.
I have decided to get a 1.2v 2800+ mobile. I'm betting it will overclock better on the voltage my motherboard can give it (only 1.55 vcore). It should be here friday I'll see how/if it works then. I'm hoping to run at 300x8 or better, 325x8 or 300x9 would be ideal.
Edit: My motherboard is an AOpen AK89 MAX btw.
Originally posted by: Diogenes2
Originally posted by: djm68
Hey Bar,
Question about the no 1:1 ratio with 2 dimms. Unless I am missing something, I am running the memory on my vnf3-250 1:1 @ddr500 -- 2 sticks of OCZ 3700EB. Any way to verify this for sure?
Cheers,
DJM
Bar might want to respond, but I have tested 2 x 512 @ 250 1:1 also... I have gone up to 260 with one DIMM.. Not sure if a BIOS change would improve this..
This is with the memory set to Auto.. Whenever I try to set the memory to 166 or 133, lower the HT, multi, and up the FSB to 270 or higher, I get a CPU fault and it won't boot..
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
One addendum I'd suggest adding to the FAQs is that some boards such as my Shuttle AN50R offer a voltage range that goes below 1v so the CG B2 35W Mobile's default 1.2v should not be an issue for some boards.
Originally posted by: Bar81
The problem is specifically with the beta BIOS, 2 DIMMs, and the 1:1 setting. The board simply will not work above DDR400 with those settings. Using the 166 setting I have gotten memory up to DDR500 speeds so it's just apparently a quirk at this point in time.
Originally posted by: dimasukr
Again, I tried 2x512MB OCZPC4400 EL GOLD and no matter what timings I choose (even the slowest ones - 3-6-6-15 2T) or whether I do load safe settings or optimized beta BIOS will not work with 1:1.
The problem goes away with 04/30 BIOS (btw it is also BETA - official one is 03/08 version).
1 DIMM will work stable up to 275MHz - I could even boot it up to 290 (need some memory cooling for this to work).
The biggest problem with 05/07 BIOS is that you cannot force you memory to 1:1 ie. 200Mhz option disappeared from the menu (it was there in 04/30 version).
I hope this is not how production BIOS will look like.
Originally posted by: Bar81
Originally posted by: oralpain
My motherboard has been able to do 420x5 with clockgen totaly stable. Just needed to lower HTT to x1, and memory to ddr200. Definatly noth the fastest setting but it proves PCI/AGP lock beyond a doubt.
You can't run the memory 1:1 with an athlon 64 anyway, it's divided down from the cpu speed. I sold my pc3200 bh-5 and made more than enough money to get some decent pc4000. My baord only goes to 2.85vdimm wich was only enough for me to get my bh-5 to around 210-215MHz. Running the memory with slightly worse timings, but with 25% more MHz should give me a small performance increase.
I have decided to get a 1.2v 2800+ mobile. I'm betting it will overclock better on the voltage my motherboard can give it (only 1.55 vcore). It should be here friday I'll see how/if it works then. I'm hoping to run at 300x8 or better, 325x8 or 300x9 would be ideal.
Edit: My motherboard is an AOpen AK89 MAX btw.
That's interesting, I haven't heard of anyone getting that high. How does the 1x HTT affect performance?
Also interesting re the memory divisor. That would explain why there is no difference in the setting the memory at 200 or 166 as the Athlon 64 is not very bandwidth dependant. I'm thinking of doing the same thing actually depending on what I want to do. I know I can get $400 for my Mushkin :Q
Well, let us know how the mobile works out. I've been curious myself.
Originally posted by: Bar81
Well, considering my RAM can do DDR500 speeds I'm hesitant to give it away just because Chaintech is incompetent. I ordered the new MSI board; the more time I spend with the Chaintech, the more it pisses me off.
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: Bar81
Well, considering my RAM can do DDR500 speeds I'm hesitant to give it away just because Chaintech is incompetent. I ordered the new MSI board; the more time I spend with the Chaintech, the more it pisses me off.
this just proves my theory of not wanting to get one of these "lower tier" company's products
I'll stick with what works
never had problems with:
Asus
Soltek
DFI
MSI
Originally posted by: Bar81
With the beta 5/7/04 BIOS???
Originally posted by: Bar81
If it's set to auto in the 5/7 BIOS it's my understanding that it defaults to 166 unless you manually select the 1T option. When you boot up does it say DDR400, then below it DDR 500?