http://science.slashdot.org/st...or-Gravitational-Waves
The problem I have with gravity waves is the fact that they distort the medium in which they travel. As a result, they should remain undetectable.
If you lived in flatland, and someone was bending your plane, there is no way you would know.
But if you lived in flatland and someone was stretching your plane, you'd see a hubble redshift.
If gravity waves cause pulsatile contraction-expansions, the hubble parameter should vary in sync with the local quasar, black hole or intense gravity source you are observing.
Hasn't that been seen already? or Not? and why will the new method of looking at higher frequency quasars be any better than LISA? I thought longer, low frequency waves traveled better over longer distances with less diffraction.
The problem I have with gravity waves is the fact that they distort the medium in which they travel. As a result, they should remain undetectable.
If you lived in flatland, and someone was bending your plane, there is no way you would know.
But if you lived in flatland and someone was stretching your plane, you'd see a hubble redshift.
If gravity waves cause pulsatile contraction-expansions, the hubble parameter should vary in sync with the local quasar, black hole or intense gravity source you are observing.
Hasn't that been seen already? or Not? and why will the new method of looking at higher frequency quasars be any better than LISA? I thought longer, low frequency waves traveled better over longer distances with less diffraction.