Wait: First you guys complain that there is no 4k monitor with G-Sync and after Asus anounced one i cant read anything here?
Let me change this: http://techreport.com/news/25857/asus-4k-monitor-has-799-price-tag-g-sync-support
Wow.
If it isn't IPS, it's AMVA. Which is just as good with better black levels. You just don't get 10 bit adobe RGB color, which is a non issue if you're a gamer.
lol TN. Not worth $1.
Where are the IPS panels with gsync announced ?
lol TN. Not worth $1.
Where are the IPS panels with gsync announced ?
The response time on it makes me think it is TN.Think this is IPS?
Price makes me think it has to be, or terribly priced.
So ASUS is going to sell a 27 inch TN 4k display for $800 and a 27 inch TN 1440p screen for $800.
My derp logic is saying does not compute.
Correction: This news post originally described the ROG Swift PG278Q as a 4K monitor. That was incorrect. The display actually has a 2560x1440 resolution.
While you may not like TN, TN has advantages that IPS doesn't. Now TN displays no longer have the resolution disadvantage. I'm curious if all the Gsync monitors require really good response times, or maybe we just have to wait for IPS if you want IPS.
Terribly priced? Name another 120hz G-sync 1440p 27in monitor.Think this is IPS?
Price makes me think it has to be, or terribly priced.
At least things are starting to pop with G-Sync, I was starting to get worried... Bring on the selection!
One thing you can also take away from this announcement is that the ASUS exclussivity until Q3 was bunk: http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/CES-2014-Philips-27-144Hz-Monitor-G-Sync
Phillips is supposed to have theirs coming in the spring.
Resolution was never a disadvantage of TN, there just was no one willing to make anything above a 1080p panel using the tech, as most users of higher resolutions wouldn't want a TN. With the 4K hype that looks to be changing.
With all the inherent IQ disadvantage of TN, I think a high resolution TN screen would be about the most disgusting monitor you could buy with those issues amplified by the higher resolution.
Hopefully some IPS panels with gsync get announced. 120hz I am not so interested in with reviews of gsync saying it's best usage case is for sub 60fps with framerates above that not making much of a difference using gsync.
Terribly priced? Name another 120hz G-sync 1440p 27in monitor.
Are you seriously offended by me saying you don't have to purchase one, or any other product that cost extra? It is not an attack, just a statement of fact. No one is forcing anyone to pay extra for new features.
The response time on it makes me think it is TN.
While you may not want a TN display, this is opening up the door for 144hz 1440p and higher displays.
That's not at all what I said. What I was saying is you don't have to pay for any feature upgrade. As in, no one does. You were saying that what if people had to pay an extra $100 for added features. My point is, you already are faced with added cost for features. This is just another one.No. I'm not offended. It's just that it avoids a reasonable discussion and instead turns it into about the individual. If you are just going to dismiss what I say like that, why bother responding. You are basically responding to me but saying what I think is irrelevant.