Yeah, I think that's a safe bet, because the headlines in the OP are false as fuck. When the person testifying as to why someone wasn't charged for some crime says "It's because there wasn't enough evidence of said crime" and several members here seem to be unable to grasp what that means, just as you seem unable to grasp what that means. Willfully ignorant again, I guess, right?
Well, yeh, but he wants so badly to believe otherwise that he does.