Too bad I don't have the time to dissect your whole post.
Who was defending the spending under Bush? Look at how many idiots are defending the spending (that is much greater) under Obama. BTW they are drawing funds from our and our kids accounts.
My god you are pathetic. I must have hit a nerve, why else would you be claiming to be so out of time to address what I wrote, then go right on to stick around and post four more times in the next hour? Seriously, how old are you? Did you somehow not realize that these posts are time stamped??
Yeah, just a shame you didn't have time to expound a little. I was hoping to see you prove my point in some kind of vapid, dishonest display of petty partisanship, the same kind I lamented in my first post, the popular past time of GOP apologists for the majority of 2000-2008. You know, the good ol stuff of resortingto the faulty labels and baseless assumptions in lieu of supporting or defending an argument. Darn.
Group think.... all you liberal small government libertarians are the same... defend Barry and Bash Bush. Not much diversity in thought.
LMAO, nm, there we go! That's some vintage 2004 Fail right there! Thank you Bud, awfully kind of you to illustrate exactly what I was talking about. You get extra points for trying that right before you attempt to critique others for not having "much diversity in thought." Definitely one of the more amusing ways I'm been proven right, and I appreciate it.
You really should take Z's post of "Those who speak autoritatively (sic) about those with whom they disagree are almost always wrong; their opinions colored by bias and differences in opinion." and contemplate it a bit. Or, you could continue the unoriginal and incorrect sockpuppet routine, whatever works for you...