- Feb 19, 2001
- 20,158
- 20
- 81
Sure i agree with that. However when you pay a premium price, you should get a full upgrade. And im not singling out Apple on this, plenty of Android OEMs are worse. Its like buying a flagship device with an 8 core CPU but then you find out they were too cheap to use Gorilla Glass and went with regular instead to save costs. I know your opinion is that iPad 1 is still good with 5.1 but i disagree, its far from iOS smooth now and Safari crashes constantly, one of the reasons is because Apple cheaped out on the RAM.
Your logic is that its pointless to have better specs today when they are not used anyway. My logic is that even if its pointless today, what about 18 months from now?
The iPad 1 might be a blunder and it was pretty apparent by the time the iPad 2 was out. Now the iPad 3 is out, we're 1.5 years since the introduction of the iPad 2. The iPad 2 does just fine, and in fact very damn well. Meanwhile it's like if you didn't have quad core on Android you're really missing out.
I guess the question is what do you really need a quad or octa core for on a PC to do basic tasks? If you game heavily or do some crazy rendering I can see a purpose, but what more are you going to get out of your iPhone with a quad core CPU? Is the 60fps constant smoothness going to be turned into 120 fps? No. Android had this issue because it lagged in a lot of aspects and going from dual to quad made a huge difference.
People were like "wow that 1ghz is close to iOS smooth" and then said the same thing when dual core came out, and again when quad came out and then finally when JellyBean was released. So we were never really at iOS smoothness for the longest time. I guess that's why upgraded hardware mattered so much.
I do think we need improved hardware, but at the same time I don't think there should be some crazy race to the latest and greatest. While it'd be nice, I don't think it *should* ruin any phone if the OS is properly designed and optimized.