Sheeeeeeiiiiittttt...
I'd say a N5 is worth $300 more than a Moto X.
So, you're saying the Moto X is only worth $50? Given the cost in parts alone, that's clearly ridiculous - though not as bad as charging $650 for the Dev Edition.
Sheeeeeeiiiiittttt...
I'd say a N5 is worth $300 more than a Moto X.
I think AT&T will unlock any device you have through them that's at least 6 months old, provided you've paid on time, etc, etc.
In addition to the general eligibility requirements, you must meet the following requirements to unlock a phone or tablet you purchased with a Service Commitment (contract) if you're a postpaid customer:
1. Your account must be in good standing (i.e., it has no past due amount or unpaid balance owed AT&T).
2. You've satisfied all contract obligations, including any Service Commitment associated with the device to be unlocked, in one of the following ways:
a. Fulfillment of the Service Commitment by expiration of any contractual term
b. Payment of any applicable Early Termination Fee
c. Upgrading to a new device under AT&T standard or early upgrade policies
No, that's not what I said. In my opinion, a Nexus 5 priced at $650 and a Moto X priced at $349 would actually make more sense than the complete opposite.So, you're saying the Moto X is only worth $50? Given the cost in parts alone, that's clearly ridiculous - though not as bad as charging $650 for the Dev Edition.
Their help page says this about unlocking:
http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB414532&cv=820#fbid=Il5jemliRkH
But perhaps AT&T allows their CSRs more discretion on unlocking?
It's my understanding, at least in the past few years, that if you were traveling overseas AT&T is actually fairly lenient about unlocking your device unless it was an iPhone. I don't know if that's changed since AT&T cracked down on their unlocking in the past couple of months.
A lot of bugs. LOL?
Sheeeeeeiiiiittttt...
I'd say a N5 is worth $300 more than a Moto X.
Just did the unboxing:
Thoughts on the camera:
- Same bad interface
I don't mind the interface. I prefer the simplicity
- But interface is only one part of it. You can still have a great sensor, optics, and great processing for beautiful photos. It's a step up from the N4, but it isn't amazing.
N4 camera flat out sucked, so to say it is only a step up from that is troubling IMHO
- I wish the burst mode was faster. Everyone who always says with HDR you need to stand really still, say that to an iPhone 5 user. That thing shoots 8 fps. Even a GS3 or HTC One X do 6-8 fps and can capture the HDR photo in no time. The frame rates of this thing is similar to an iPhone 4 or 4s doing HDR. It's kinda sad. I take HDR photos on my iPhone 5 by default and rarely do I have to worry about standing still. It's only been an issue on my N4, and it looks to be the same on the N5.
Well, it's a new OS... Developers need time to update their apps.
Now THAT is good. I'm even more curious to see proper battery life tests now.
No, that's not what I said. In my opinion, a Nexus 5 priced at $650 and a Moto X priced at $349 would actually make more sense than the complete opposite.
-I mentioned in my first Bestbuy post that there is a $100 premium.Noted. I inferred it. I didn't really see a point in mentioning something that happened three days ago and had already been fixed well before your post so I took it as the general "OMG BB SUCKS!" consensus that's been going around since Friday. A lot of people seem awfully upset at this misstep by BB.
as a moto X user, the N5 better be a hell of a phone to even be on par with the moto X regardless of price.
I impulse bought the N5, which I will get tomorrow, and I am kind of regretting making the purchase based on the reviews I am seeing. I think the battery life on the N5 is going to be very bad compared to the moto X. I think the only benefit of the N5 is the kit kat OS out of the box. the moto X is getting it, so not sure how much of a benefit that will be in a time.
you can throw all the specs you want at me about screen resolution and processor, but at the end of the day, neither of those things are going to make the overall experience better. The 5" screen is a plus, but the small form factor of the Moto X whilst packing a 4.7" screen is great
I have personally used
Nexus 1
Iphone 4 and 4S (played with a 5s a little)
Galaxy Nexus
Nexus 4
Nokia 900
samsung S4
I carry a moto X for about a month now and it is far and away the best phone I have ever used. every nexus phone I have had has always had issues... from the charging issues on the GN, to the crap battery, camera, and speakers on the N4. The more I think about it, I am not even the least bit excited for ups to drop off the 5 tomorrow
edit:
if you all want to know what makes the moto X so good -
1.)Buttery smooth. snappiest phone I have personally used
2.) big enough screen in a form factor that is extremely nice to hold in the hand
3.) notifications.
4.)Okay Google now functions from locked state
5.)basically stock android
6.) great battery life
7.) custom colors at no extra charge
Prepare to get disappointed. Waiting for your review.
You can throw all the specs you want at me about screen resolution and processor, but at the end of the day, neither of those things are going to make the overall experience better.
I'm also struggling to find out whether I could buy an iphone on contract and ebay it without activating. Some say you can, some say you can't.
I don't disagree with you. But, is that software worth $300? I, and a lot of people, don't think so.
I have no question that the Moto X is a great phone and a great experience. But it's horribly overpriced. For the price, I'd much rather buy a higher-spec device that will probably get most of the software features of the moto X (for example, 'Ok, Google' in KitKat) in a future update.
the moto X is still has 8 cores...
the notifications is a big thing I like on the moto X, this isn't coming to the N5 from what I can see